Court : Chennai
..... and 40% for reserved category. it is stated that the state government is bound by the norms that have been fixed by the central authority established under the central act in respect of professional courses and higher education, and power has been carved out for the state government only to increase the eligibility criteria ..... to consider various aspects such as shortage of rural literacy, financial constraints of the students, etc. moreover, the aicte has approved about 400 self-financing engineering colleges throughout the state including the rural areas, and therefore, the state government considering the above aspects framed a policy to admit the students belonging ..... the learned single judge dismissed the writ petition. feeling aggrieved, the state of tamil nadu has preferred this appeal.10. w.p.no.28832 of 2012 the government of tamil nadu, department of technical education sc/st employees welfare association represented by its general secretary has approached this court by means of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... found in articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of india. 45.in fact, section 18(3) of the right to information act, 2005, confers power of the central information commission or the state information commission with all the powers of civil court while trying a suit under the code of civil procedure ..... by state legislature; (d) by notification issued or order made by the appropriate government, and includes any- (i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed; (ii) non-government organisation substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate government. 29.likewise, section 2(i) defines "record" which includes (a) any document, manuscript ..... a party/respondent by the writ petitioner/registrar general, high court of madras, when the orders passed by the tamil nadu information commission dated 02.07.2012, are challenged before this court. in fact, even when the orders of the tamil nadu information commission, chennai, are challenged by the aggrieved party, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... tax returns are personal information which stand exempted from disclosure under clause (j) of section 8(1) of the rti act, unless involves a larger public interest and the central public information officer or the state public information officer or the appellate authority is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies ..... by state legislature; (d) by notification issued or order made by the appropriate government, and includes any- (i) body owned, controlled or substantially financed; (ii)non-government organisation substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate government; (i) record includes- (a) any document, manuscript and file; (b) any ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner cites the order of the hon'ble supreme court in special leave petition (civil) no.27734 of 2012 (@ cc 14781/2012) dated 03.10.2012 between girish ramchandra deshpande v. cen. information commissioner & others, wherein in paragraphs 12 to 16, it is observed and laid down .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... government of india ministry of commerce directorate general of foreign trade udyog bhavan, new delhi 11 011 dated :31. 7.2008 to: commissioner of customs (exports) ministry of finance department of revenue 33, rajaji salai, customs-house chenna 001. kind attention: shri c.rangaraju, joint commissioner of customs, group 7 deec/ subject: clarification on import of ..... date and it will not effect the validity of the license in question issued on 15.4.2010, which has got validity up to 14.4.2012.12. on a plea made by the learned additional central government standing counsel appearing for respondents 1 to 3 that the in-bond sale invoice is dated 4.8 ..... ex-bond bill of entry no.7590365, dated 6.8.2012 before the customs department, chennai for clearance of the goods under dfia license no.0710070929 stating that it has been duly endorsed for transferability by the competent authority in terms of the foreign trade (development & regulation) act, 1992. it is under this transferred dfia license that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... further adjournments holding that the assesee had sufficient opportunity and made assessments to the best of his judgment under rule 15 of the central sales tax (orissa) rules, 1957, and section 12(4) of the orissa sales tax act, 1947, treating the gross turnovers returned to be their taxable turnovers. in the case of inter-state sales, he disallowed the ..... of the appeal uninfluenced by any of the observations made in this order on merits and in accordance with law. no costs. consequently, the connected m.p.no.1 of 2012 is also dismissed. abe/dixit to the assistant commissioner of income tax, company circl ii(4), room no.514, new block - 5th floor, 121, mahatma gandhi road, nungambakkam ..... in the high court of judicature at madras dated:10. 04.2013 coram : the honourable mr. justice v.dhanapalan w.p.no.1638 of 2012 m/s.kone elevator india pvt. ltd., rep. by its managing director, sri neeraj sharma, no.50-55, vanagaram road, ayanambakkam, chennai-600 095. .. petitioner vs. the assistant .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... vehicles could be done only through legal means. the banks cannot employ goondas to take possession by force." 22 the hon'ble supreme court in citicorp maruti finance ltd. vs. s.vijayalaxmi [(2012)1 scc 1.was pleased to lay down as under: "27. till such time as the ownership is not transferred to the purchaser, the hirer normally ..... premises. 2 the question to be determined in this case is "whether the provision of section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, can be invoked to use the high court as a recovery agent by finance companies/banks to seize the vehicle ex-parte, without giving an opportunity of hearing to the respondent/ borrower, by seeking appointment of ..... were informed that all the high courts have not so far made rules. whereas the section 84 gives the central government power to make rules to carry out the provisions of the act, the high court should also, wherever necessary, make rules. it would be helpful if such rules deal with the procedure to be followed by the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... of vehicles could be done only through legal means. the banks cannot employ goondas to take possession by force." 22 the hon'ble supreme court in citicorp maruti finance ltd. vs. s.vijayalaxmi [(2012)1 scc 1.was pleased to lay down as under: "27. till such time as the ownership is not transferred to the purchaser, the hirer normally ..... 005 order this application under order xiv rule 8 of o.s. rules read with sec.9(ii)(b) & (e) of arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 have been filed by m/s.hinduja leyland finance ltd., seeking an order to appoint an advocate commissioner to seize and deliver the vehicle, which is available at the respondent's premises at putibandh, ..... were informed that all the high courts have not so far made rules. whereas the section 84 gives the central government power to make rules to carry out the provisions of the act, the high court should also, wherever necessary, make rules. it would be helpful if such rules deal with the procedure to be followed by the courts .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... of vehicles could be done only through legal means. the banks cannot employ goondas to take possession by force." 22 the hon'ble supreme court in citicorp maruti finance ltd. vs. s.vijayalaxmi [(2012)1 scc 1.was pleased to lay down as under: "27. till such time as the ownership is not transferred to the purchaser, the hirer normally ..... padmanabhan nair order this application under order xiv rule 8 of o.s. rules read with sec.9(ii) (e) of arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 has been filed by m/s.citicorp finance india ltd. to appoint an advocate commissioner to seize and deliver the subject property from the premises of the respondent with police aid and break open ..... were informed that all the high courts have not so far made rules. whereas the section 84 gives the central government power to make rules to carry out the provisions of the act, the high court should also, wherever necessary, make rules. it would be helpful if such rules deal with the procedure to be followed by the courts .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... of tamil nadu commercial taxes and registration department, fort. st. george chenna 009. 2. the arbitrator district court of chit cases central chennai, no.26 rajaji salai, chenna 3. m/s.sree gokulam chits and finance company (p) ltd., no.49, arcot road chenna 024. ...respondents writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india ..... comes to the conclusion that there is no merit in the writ petition and the same deserves dismissal. accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. no costs. 09.04.2012 index: yes/no internet: yes/no gpa to 1. the government of tamil nadu commercial taxes and registration department, fort. st. george chenna 009. 2. the arbitrator ..... raising the following contentions:1) the chit was unregistered and hence, the initiation of the arbitration under the act was not sustainable;2) no legal notice was issued under sections 32 and 33 of the chit funds act; and3) no copy of the chit agreement was given to the appellant.9. as the said contentions were .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
..... 2013 (m-st) (pd) dated 07.02.2013 issued under section 35f central excise act, 1944 read with section 85 of the finance act, 1994 in a.no. 432 of 2011(m-st) and 627/2012 (m-st) and quash the same.3. the case of the petitioner ..... 164/2013 (m-st) (pd) dated 07.02.2013 issued under section 35f central excise act, 1944 read with section 85 of the finance act, 1994 in a.no. 432 of 2011(m-st) and 627/2012 (m-st) and quash the same. for petitioner : mr. v.s. ..... of the original authority, on appeal, it is mandatory to pre-deposit the amount as per the provisions of the finance act or the central excise act as the case may be, and in case there is any hardship, it is for the authority concerned to ..... manoj for m/s. k.vaitheeswaran for respondent : mr.m.santhanaraman, scgsc .. .. .. o r d e r heard mr.v.s. manoj, learned counsel for the petitioner and mr.m.santhanaraman, learned senior central .....
Tag this Judgment!