Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 12a Sorted by: old Page 92 of about 13,331 results (0.322 seconds)

Gompers Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and curious inquiries. in our opinion, the proper interpretation of the statute begins with the substantive, not with the adjective, part. the substantive portion of the section is that no person shall be tried for any offense not capital except within a certain time. those words are of universal scope. what follows is a ..... been assumed that the concluding words, "unless the indictment is found or the information is instituted within three years" limit the offenses given the benefit of the act to those usually prosecuted in that way, and the counsel for the petitioners were at some pains to argue that the charges of the committee amounted to an ..... person shall be prosecuted for an offense not capital unless the indictment is found or information instituted within three years after commission of the offense applies to acts of contempt not committed in the presence of the court. provisions of the constitution of the united states are not mathematical formulas having their essence in their .....

Port Richmond Ferry Vs. Hudson County

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the state in which such owner or keeper resided. sail and rowboats, and flats or scows, were the vessels in use, as is manifest from the act itself. . . . the act meant to authorize, and did authorize, the boards of freeholders in the several counties, to regulate the fares to be taken at the ferry situate within ..... in order to secure reasonable charges in a myriad of such different local instances exhibiting an endless variety of circumstance, it would be necessary for congress to act directly or to establish for that purpose a federal agency. the matter is illuminated by the consideration of this alternative, for the point of the contention is ..... is interstate commerce and subject to regulation by congress, and it is beyond the competency of the states to impose direct burdens thereon; congress not having acted on the subject, however, the states may exercise a measure of regulatory power not inconsistent with the federal authority and not actually burdening or interfering with interstate .....

United States Vs. Buffalo Pitts Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... right of possession and the right to convert the property in the mortgagee. kitchen v. schuster, 14 n.m. 164. furthermore, the government was authorized by 7 of the act of june 17, 1902, 32 stat. 388, c. 1093, under which this improvement was being made, to acquire any property necessary for the purpose, and, if need be ..... the interior referred the matter, and by the chief engineer and assistant chief engineer of the reclamation service, under the direction of the department, ratified and adopted the acts of reed in respect to the possession of the engine and appurtenances. the mortgagor has never made any claim to the property since the suspension and assignment of ..... for the particular work and to pay therefor, there is an implied contract on the part of the government to pay for the property, and jurisdiction exists under he tucker act. united states v. lynah, 188 u. s. 445 , followed, and harley v. united states, 198 u. s. 229 , distinguished. when, in the exercise of its governmental .....

Akhoy Kumar Banerjee Vs. Corporation

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1914)ILR42Cal625

..... of redemption, neither of them would have been bound to give him any information, such as a vendor is under an obligation to furnish under section 55 of the transfer of property act, to an intending purchaser of his property. the mortgagee, therefore, was in reality a person who acquired title under an involuntary alienation by his mortgagor ..... arises, where, as here,' only a charge has been created by express words of the statute, and not a mortgage as in cases under section 13 of the patni regulation or section 171 of the bengal tenancy act. what, then, is the position? the consolidated rate, as it accrued, due, became a first charge upon the property, but no ..... hands of the appellants, must depend upon the nature and incidents of the charge. a charge is defined in section 100 of the transfer of property act in the following termswhere immoveable property of one person is, by act of parties or operation of law, made security, for the payment of money to another, and the transaction does .....

Burke Vs. Southern Pacific R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the resolution than the one suggested. omitting page 234 u. s. 708 its saving clause, the provision is not materially different from 4 of the original act, being the section providing for patents. as already said, the chief purpose of the resolution was to sanction a route -- the one indicated on the map mentioned. the ..... hundred and sixty-six, expressly saving and reserving all the rights of actual settlers, together with the other conditions and restrictions provided for in the third section of said act." it will be observed that there is no direct mention of mineral lands, nor any indirect reference to them save such as is involved in the ..... the approval entered upon the plat by the surveyor general under the direction of the land department was in terms 'subject to the conditions and provisions of section 6 of the act of congress, approved june 21, 1860,' such limitation was beyond the power of executive officers to impose." according to the statute relating to placer mining claims .....

Talari Kavoli Nagadu Vs. Viswanatham Pedda Govindappa and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1915Mad502; 25Ind.Cas.133

..... time when the suit was instituted and could not thus be made to affect the title of the defendant, because the doctrine of lis pendens (section 52 of the transfer of property act) was inapplicable to cases in which the property involved is inoveable. the authorities cited for the inapplicability of the doctrine of lis pendens were wigram ..... clear from the judgment in the first suit that there the right to immoveable property was directly and specifically in question within the terms of section 52 of the transfer of property act so that here the doctrine of us pendens applies and the plaintiff cannot say: ' i purchased from him whose title was under adjudication and ..... directly and substantially in issue .in the former suit was title to proparty other than that which was the subject of the latter suit, and that, therefore, section 11 (then section 13) of the civil procedure code was no bar to the second suit. the decision in niaz-uttah khan v. nazir begam (2) is also, therefore, inapplicable to .....

Panambatta Kalathil Kunchu Menon Vs. Kalathinpadikil Narayanan Ezhutes ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1915Mad100; 25Ind.Cas.641

..... he is bound as such ' to pay the amount by which the assessment on the land mortgaged was enhanced after the date of the mortgage. under section 76 (c) of the transfer of property act the mortgagee in possession is bound to pay the revenue in the absence of a contract to the contrary. the following words in the mortgage, exhibit ii ..... the latter provision which would have frustrated the purpose of the former. i, therefore, hold that the mortgage contains a contract to the contrary such as is referred to in section 76(c)4. of the cases relied on by the plaintiff, in kolli valappil v. natuwath pappu 14 ind. cas. 590 the terms of the mortgage are not given, but .....

P.K. Kalliani Amma and ors. Vs. M.T. Narayanan Nambiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1915Mad962; (1915)28MLJ266

..... proof of its terms would consist either of the document itself or secondary evidence of its contents in casses in which secondary evidence is admissible (indian evidence act, section 91). when therefore, the plaintiffs came to court alleging that they would rely on a mortgage identified in the manner above referred to, the defendants had ..... which superseded the prior mortgage, exhibit a.10. now when a contract has been embodied in a document, the parties to it are precluded by section 91, evidence act from enforcing by way of suit obligations arising out of such contract except by proving the original document itself or by letting in secondary evidence of its ..... from embrandiri and that cherunni amma got patta transferred in her name and was holding the property under that title.8. for the purpose of section 19 of the limitation act, it is not necessary that all the legal consequences that may flow from the obligation acknowledged should be specified to constitute an acknowledgment (vide .....

Emperor Vs. Gana Krishna Walunj

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1914Bom258; (1914)16BOMLR939

..... be compounded. it cannot apply to cases where the person injured is entitled of himself to compound the case. the law on the point is clearly enough laid down in section 345 of the code of criminal procedure. but the magistrate thinking that he must take some action of his own called on the parties to prove that the case was ..... .shah, j.5. i agree. it is clear in this case that the offences with which the accused were charged by the complainant were compoundable and that they were in (act compounded by the person concerned. there being no doubt whatever about the fact of the offences having been compounded, it is clear that under clause 6 of ..... heaton, j.1. in this case, as disposed of by the magistrate, three persons were convicted of the offence of hurt under section 323 of the indian penal code. one was sentenced to a fine of rs. 100, the other two to a fine of rs. 50 each. the one on whom the .....

Ambalavana Pandnra Sannadhi Avergal Vs. Sreeminakshy Sundareswaral Dev ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1915)28MLJ217

..... of limitation, the plaintiff's suit fails. mr. rangachariar contended that the proper article applicable was 142. mr, srinivasa aiyangar on the other hand, argued that section 10 of the limitation act would apply, and that there was no bar of limitation. it has to be remembered that there is no complaint in this case (the contention relating to mismanagement ..... s case practically rests (exhibit b. 1). mr. rangachariar objected to the admissibility of this document on various grounds. i do not think the document comes under section 35 of the evidence act. it is not an entry made by any public officer and as pointed out in saraswati dan v. dhanpat singh i.l.r. (1882) c. 431 ..... unless the facts mentioned are within the personal knowledge of the public officer recording it, section 35 will have no application. the decision of the privy council in raja .....