Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 12a Sorted by: old Page 84 of about 13,331 results (0.340 seconds)

Mankolam Vasudevad Nambudri Vs. Mankolam Sankaran Nambudri

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1912)22MLJ60

..... when the order was passed, and he did not refuse to give evidence or to produce any documents. this rule also has no application. lastly mr. rozario falls back on section 151 of the 'code which says that the provisions of the code shall not affect any inherent jurisdiction which the court may possess. but he is not able to satisfy ..... section 15 of the charter act. this has been held in pusan mal v. fenki pershad singh i.l.r. (1901) c. 680, somasundaram chettiar v. manika vasaka desika gnana sambandha pandara sannadhi i.l.r. ( ..... here as to the value, all that i need say is that even if at be doubtful that the court has power to revise the order in this case under section 115 of the civil procedure code, the order being in the nature of an interlocutory order, there can be very little doubt that i have ample powers under .....

Malkajeppa Madivalappa Bulla Vs. the Secretary of State

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1912)14BOMLR332

..... . the question we have to decide is : is this view correct? it is admitted that the deputy collector in passing the said order purported to act under section 37 of the land revenue code, which runs thus :-all public roads, lanes and paths, the bridges, ditches, dikes and fences, on, or beside, the same, the bed of the ..... been in peaceful occupation thereof and not of the government, and passes an order with reference thereto, he is not dealing with that land in his official capacity, but is acting ultra vires. if this is so, then the judgment of jenkins, c. j., in surannanna v. secretary of state for india (1900) i. l. r. 24 bom. 435, 441 is ..... ilr (1900) 24 bom. 435. the plaint was filed on the nth of august 1908, and the defendant has raised a plea of limitation, under article 14 of the limitation act of 1877. the plaintiff in his plaint says that he unsuccessfully filed before the revenue authorities appeals against the district deputy collector. but we agree with the learned judge's .....

CurtIn Vs. Benson

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to, and established by evidence supplementing the agreement, are as follows: appellant is the owner of certain lands within the yosemite national park (the park was regularly and legally established, act october 1, 1890, 26 stat. 650, c. 1263; joint res. june 11, 1906, 34 stat. 831) and lessee of other lands therein. leading to the lands there are certain toll .....

United States Vs. Morgan

Court : US Supreme Court

..... against that particular statute in the absence of clear and unambiguous expressions. citizens are furnished the surest safeguards against malicious prosecutions by the fourth amendment. section 4 of the pure food and drug act of june 30, 1906, c. 3915, 34 stat. 678, does not repeal rev.stat., 771 or 1022, making it the ..... attorney, who ( 5), without delay, must "institute appropriate proceedings," by indictment, or libel for condemnation, or both, as the facts may warrant. but the act also contemplates ( 5) that complaints may be made to the district attorney by state health officials. in that class of cases, no doubt because the state agents investigate ..... order of discharge by a committing magistrate after an ordinary preliminary trial. for the statute contains no expression indicating an intention to withdraw offenses under this act from the general powers of the grand jury, who are diligently to inquire and true presentment make of all matters called to their attention by the .....

In Re: Subbian Servai and Five ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1913)ILR36Mad472

..... i fully realise the desirability of a more positive exposition of the law, if it were possible, and the drawbacks inevitably attendant on a state of affairs in which an act which is lawful today may become a criminal offence to-morrow and vice versa.4. in the present case the judgment gives no indication of the state of the tank .....

Basrur Venkata Row Vs. the Crown

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1912)22MLJ270

..... one nagappa hande. nagappa was also charged with forgery before the committing magistrate but died after his commitment to the sessions court. these two persons, nagappa hande and vishnumurti, financed one tammava urala in 1897 in a partition suit instituted by tammaya urala against his undivided co-parceners. nagappa obtained a mortgage bond from tammaya urala and executed a mortgage ..... assessment to income tax of one vishnumurti upadhya for the year 1905-1906. the prosecution alleges thai the b. schedule of income put in by vishnumurti under the income-tax act, the takid issued to the village officers of gundmi to send a report, the takid issued to the patel of gundmi to communicate to the assessee the order of ..... amount of suspicion that he may have had a hand in the forgeries.6. i consider the present case to be one in which it would be dangerous to act on the uncorroborated evidence of the handwriting expert. the conviction of the 1st accused must be set aside and his release ordered. .....

In Re: Basrur Venkata Row

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 14Ind.Cas.418

..... of the appellant could be taken as evidence of that fact. the testimony of a witness given before the committing magistrate may, by the special provisions of section 288 of the criminal procedure code, be accepted as substantive evidence if he is examined at the trial before the sessions court, and may be preferred to the statement ..... hande. nagappa was also charged with forgery before the committing magistrate but died after his commitment to the sessions court. these two persons nagappa hande and vishnumurti financed one tammaya urala in 1897 in a partition suit instituted by tammaya urala against his undivided co-parceners. nagappa obtained a mortgage-bond from tammaya urala and executed ..... -tax of one vishnumurti upidhya for the year 1905--1906. the prosecution alleges that the b. schedule of income put in by vishnumurti under the income tax act, the takid issued to the village officers of gundmi to send a report, the takid issued to the patel of gundmi to communicate to the assessee the .....

Muruga Chetty and ors. Vs. Rajasami and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1912)22MLJ284

..... has been held to be a ground for restoring an action dismissed for default, though the practice is not uniform in all the states. in black on judgments, section 340(a) refers to cases of negligent performance of duties, where much stronger grounds would be necessary to entitle the client to relief. at page 256 the learned ..... case owing to the solicitor's negligence), in india also, suits have been restored where the failure to appear was due to the pleader's mistake or negligence-see oriental finance corporation v. mercantile credit & etc. corporation (1866) 2 bom. h.c.r. 267 where couch c.j. states the english rule to be in support of his ..... the court would enable it to deal with any proper objections that the respondent may urge against restoration. the principle regulating dealings between parties, where one ot them acts through an agent, is not necessarily applicable to proceedings in court conducted through a pleader. the court has the control over such proceedings, and it is a question .....

Huse Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the right to make deductions, by way of fines, from compensation earned, for defects in equipment or negligence in the performance of the service. for repeated failures in performance, or acts of neglect or disobedience to orders, he was given power to annul the contract without impairing the right of the government to recover damages for nonperformance. the findings of the ..... his contract, the inadequacy of his equipment, and his disobedience to the requirements that he should enlarge and improve his facilities make it clear that the postmaster general did not act arbitrarily, nor exceed the power reserved, by the inflicting of fines or the final cancellation of the agreement on may 20, 1903. when the contract was cancelled, it was directed .....

United States Vs. Mcmullen

Court : US Supreme Court

..... proviso did not affect their case. see also guaranty co. v. golden pressed brick co., 191 u. s. 416 , 191 u. s. 424 . it is urged that the last-mentioned section, dealing with changes deemed desirable by the government, requires that they, as well as the increased or diminished compensation, must be agreed to in writing by the parties to the ..... the date of the contract, october 25, 1897, and to be completed in sixteen calendar months from the same date. in case of unavoidable delays, through accident, storm, or other act of providence, the contractor was to notify the officer in charge of the occurrence, etc., to provide for an investigation. in case of avoidable delays, no extension of time would .....