Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2007 section 8 amendment of section 12a Court: karnataka Page 12 of about 1,313 results (0.108 seconds)

Jun 20 1962 (HC)

Gowli Buddanna Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1962KAR500; [1963]50ITR467(KAR); [1963]50ITR467(Karn)

..... family and not of any individual thereof.12. it was next contended by sri srinivasan that in view of certain provisions found in the finance act of 1949 and in the subsequent finance acts, we must hold that the legislature had clearly expressed its intention as regards the meaning of the expression 'hindu undivided family'. according to ..... also rejected his contention but accepted his prayer to refer the afore-mentioned questions of law to this court for its opinion. 5. under section 3 of the indian income-tax act, the liability to pay tax is charged not only on the income of hindu undivided families. the expression 'hindu undivided family' is not ..... committee disagreed with the view of the calcutta high court as regards the meaning to be given to the expression 'hindu undivided family' found in section 3 of the indian income-tax act, 1922. sir goerge rankin, speaking for the judicial committee, observed 'the phrase 'hindu undivided family' is used in the statute with reference, not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 1999 (HC)

Micro Labs Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Assessment) an ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2001)166CTR(Kar)148; [2001]247ITR333(KAR); [2001]247ITR333(Karn); [2001]115TAXMAN27(Kar)

..... , issued by the central board of direct taxes, to the extent to which they precluded them from availing of the benefit of filing a declaration under section 64(1) of the finance act, 1997, in the year of search or any earlier year/s, as discriminatory, arbitrary and illegal and opposed to article 14 of the constitution and ..... in relation to both these persons independent of the search. in denying the persons, who have been searched under section 132 of the act, the application of the vdis provisions, clause (ii) of sub-section (2) of section 64 of the finance act, 1997, renders itself unreasonable and arbitrary.(ii) alternatively, the words 'or in respect of earlier previous year' ..... and the same was concluded on april 5, 1992. can he take advantage of vdis for the assessment year 1993-94 and subsequent years ?answer : section 64(2)(ii) of the finance act, 1997, lays down that no disclosure of income can be made in respect of the previous year in which a search is initiated or in respect .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2005 (HC)

Binani Industries Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Tax ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2006]145STC24(Kar)

..... . the court in the said decision, has noticed :the understanding of the law at the earliest point of time of its enactment cannot be ignored. the finance act, 1964, amended section 52(2) of the income-tax act, 1961 : this was understood in a particular manner by the central board of direct taxes, in a circular issued on july 7, 1964. in varghese v ..... tax accrues on the last date of the year of account on the taxable income of the previous year of a person at the rate or rates prescribed by the finance act of the year of assessment but the liability to pay sales tax arises the moment the transaction of sale or purchase is completed and at the rate specified under the ..... and the liability to tax arises not by reason of the provisions of the income-tax act but by reason of the fact that the finance act fixes the rate at which the assessee is liable to pay tax and it is by the reason of the finance act that the income of the previous year of the assessee becomes liable to tax. these principles .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2008 (HC)

B.K. Suresh Babu S/O Late B.L. Kamalaraj Chetty, Vs. Smt. Ananthalaksh ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(3)KarLJ386; 2009(1)KCCR551; 2009(2)AIRKarR214; AIR2009NOC1286

..... territory in the year 1949-50, the respondent was chargeable in respect of his income whether derived within or without rajasthan. it was, however, argued on his behalf that section 3 of the finance act, 1950, having substituted the amended clause (14-a) 'with effect from the first day of april 1950,' rajasthan was not a taxable territory during the accounting year 1949 ..... held, while placing reliance on the principle in queen v. st. mary whitechapel as follows:15. nor can it be said, in strictness, that the finance act, 1950 is retroactive legislation. that act, as already noticed, purports by section 2 to charge income tax and super tax at specified rates 'for the year beginning on the 1st day of april, 1950'. the case is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 2015 (HC)

M/s. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Karnataka

..... writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to quash section 35f of the central excise act of 1944 as amended by section 105 of the finance act of 2014 and the said section 105 of the finance act of 2014 as being unconstitutional. this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the ..... constitution of india praying to 1) declare section 35r of the central excise act, 1944 as amended by sec. 105 of the finance act (no.2), 2014 w.e.f. 6.8.2014 which provides for mandatory pre-deposit of 7.5% for first appeals ..... commercial usage for the period from july 2007 to march 2011. petitioner undertook construction of a project in the name and style of exora business park'. petitioner availed credit of service tax paid on various input services and has also undertaken to comply with the procedures as stipulated in the finance act, 1994 read with the service tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1966 (HC)

Visalakshi Vs. Income-tax Officer, City Circle Ii, Bangalore and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1968]67ITR150(KAR); [1968]67ITR150(Karn)

..... there individual income of the dpeositor. the expression 'residual 'income' has, as stated in the explanation to section 4(3) of the act, the same meaning as that given to it by section 2(8) of the finance act, 1963. that sub-section defines the expression 'residual income' as the amount of the total income from which the amount of the ..... for its payment should be preceded by an assessment. so understood, he becomes a person by whom it is payable when the finance act charges it, and we fell disposed to read the section in that way without feeling hampered by a technical or other meaning which any expression occurring in it may have received in another ..... deposited or a certain proportion of his residual in come. the expression 'residual income' was defined by section 2 of the finance act, 1963 (act no. xiii of 1963). 3. we are not concerned with the other parts of section 4, such as, sub-sections (4) and (5) which were applicable to employees and persons liable to pay advance tax, since .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2005 (HC)

Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Office ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2005)195CTR(Kar)360; [2005]275ITR227(KAR); [2005]275ITR227(Karn)

..... before the tribunal.5. in the context of the submission, learned counsel has drawn my attention to the provisions of section 194a of the it act (for short 'act') and draws particular attention to clause (ix) of section 194a of the act inserted by finance act, 2003, w.e.f. 1st june, 2003, and submits that it is only thereafter the petitioner is required ..... aggregate of the amounts of such income credited or paid during the financial year does not exceed fifty thousand rupees.'*inserted by finance act, 2003, w.e.f. 1st june, 2003.reading of section 194a(1) of the act clearly indicates that any person, not being an individual or an huf who is responsible for distribution of interest which is ..... shall be deemed to be credit of such income to the account of the payee and the provisions of this section shall apply accordingly.(2) (omitted by the finance act, 1992, w.e.f. 1st june, 1992)(3) the provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply-(i) to (viii) xxxxxx*(ix) to such income credited or paid by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2008 (HC)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Konkan Marine Agencies

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2009)221CTR(Kar)467; 2009[13]STR7; [2009]18STT115; (2009)22VST52(Karn)

..... for export. if that be so, even this circular does not help the appellant in any manner whatsoever.cargo handling service has been defined in section 65(23) in the finance act, 1994. the said definition reads as under:'cargo handling service' means loading, unloading, packing or unpacking of cargo and includes cargo handling services provided ..... the appellant, on admission. records perused.2. this appeal has been preferred by the revenue under section 35-g(2) of the central excise act, 1944 (hereinafter shall be referred to in short as the 'act') against the order dated 6-8-2007 passed by the customs, excise and service tax appellate tribunal, bangalore, (for short 'cestat') ..... in assessee's appeal no. s.t/75/2007.assessee had filed appeal against the order in revision dated 20-12-2006 passed by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 2010 (HC)

Shriram Chits (Bangalore) Limited. Vs. the Joint Commissioner of Incom ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2010(2)KCCR1006

..... ble apex court in ranchi club ltd. case and that the order of rectification was required to be passed by him in view of the subsequent retrospective amendment of section 234b of the finance act, 2001. accordingly an order was passed calling upon the assessee to pay a sum of rs. 1,06,48,211/-. being aggrieved by the order of rectification ..... taxes, has no application to the fact of this case. according to him, the hon'ble supreme court in commissioner of income-tax v. max india limited reported in : (2007) 295 itr 282 (sc) has taken a view at the relevant point of time when two views were possible, if the assessing officer has taken one view, but on ..... the judgment of the hon'ble supreme court in ranchi club limited he had not levied interest under section 234. but he has reopened the case based on the amendment of section 234b by finance act, 2001. from reading of the order passed under section 154, it is clear to us that while passing an order of assessment, the assessing officer had not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 1991 (HC)

Widia (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (1991)98CTR(Kar)114; [1992]194ITR77(KAR); [1992]194ITR77(Karn)

..... the tax, which is one aspect. another facet of interpretation is to understand the word 'payable' in rule 2 in the context of the second proviso to section 2(6) of the finance act. the said proviso states that, in lieu of payment of surcharge... deposit may be made under the scheme. in other words, instead of the tax being paid ..... bank of india is repayable to the assessee after five years and the said deposit carries interest at the rate of 6% per annum. the proviso to section 2(6) of the finance act, 1976, referred to above, gives an option to the assessee either to pay the surcharge or make the deposit. it was contended by learned counsel for ..... (sb)). hence, this reference at the instance of the assessee. 3. the question arises because of certain provisions of the finance act, 1976, read with a scheme framed thereunder. as per the second proviso to section 2(6) of the finance act, 1976, an assessee, being a company, may in lieu of payment of surcharge on income-tax at the rate specified .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //