Court : Supreme Court of India
..... remind ourselves at this stage that according to the defendant-union of india, the plaintiff state is apparently a highly debt stressed state that has mismanaged its finances. this statement, however, is strongly refuted by the state. according to the union, the plaintiff has the highest ratio of pension to total revenue ..... the evidence that is sufficient in law to raise a presumption of fact unless rebutted.17. the plaintiff state has argued that based on the states finance accounts audited by the comptroller and auditor general of india and the achievements of the fiscal deficit targets, the plaintiff state has under-utilized permissible borrowing ..... india, challenging, inter alia, the following (collectively, the impugned actions ): (a) amendment act no.13 of 2018 (dated 28.03.2018): by this amendment act, the parliament has amended section 4 of the fiscal responsibility and budget management act, page 1 of 24 2003, whereby the central government is obligated to ensure that the aggregate .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... court in respect of claims for compensation now payable by the railway administration under section 124a of the said act or the rules made thereunder. (1b) the claims tribunal shall also exercise, on and from the commencement of part xiv of chapter vi of the finance act, 2017 (7 of 2017), the jurisdiction, powers and authority conferred on the ..... not 365 kms. as charged by the appellant railways. therefore, the respondent company made correspondence with the railways through letters dated 3.10.2006, 5.5.2007 and 20.07.2007 requesting to take corrective action. [...]. xxx xxx xxx 14. it is and admitted fact that the respondent company had transported the irone ore fines / minerals ..... through the railways for the period from 25.05.2006 to 04.01.2007 at the rates fixed by the railway. the main controversy was in respect of refund of excess freight charges said to have been collected by the railways than .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... the state and even that should not be levied when that last sale or purchase is in the course of inter-state trade or commerce as defined. act 31 of 1958 amended section 15 to impose certain modified restrictions and conditions with the details of which we are not here concerned. these restrictions clearly entailed loss of revenue to ..... exception to the judgment dated 19th october 2006 passed by a division bench of delhi high court. in the exercise of powers under section 4(1) of the delhi sales tax act, 1975 (the dst act), the government of delhi issued a notification on 31st march 1999 stating that the rate of the state sales tax on silk fabrics ..... force, the central government decided to pass an act to provide for the levy and collection of additional duties of excise on certain goods and for the distribution of a part of the net proceeds thereof among the states in pursuance of the principles of distribution recommended by the second finance commission in its report dated 30-9-1957. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... to combat it, there is no single or umbrella legislation in india which relates to climate change and the attendant concerns. 15 energy conservation act 2001, section 14(w). 17 | p age however, this does not mean that the people of india do not have a right against the adverse effects ..... neutral future. isa's mission is to unlock usd1trillion of investments in solar energy by 2030 while reducing the cost of the technology and its financing. it is partnering with multilateral development banks, development financial institutions, private and public sector organisations, civil society, and other international institutions to deploy cost ..... cent cumulative electric power installed capacity from non-fossil fuel-based energy resources by 2030, with support from the transfer of technology and low-cost international finance, including from the green climate fund; b. to enhance investments in development programs in sectors vulnerable to climate change, particularly agriculture, water resources, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... or public domain or even with family members at home. most certainly, this court notes that this is not the language that nation s youth or otherwise citizens 74 section 67, it act; ranjit udeshi (supra). 34 of this country use, and this language cannot be called the frequently spoken language used in our country.36. when the entire content ..... high court s finding is that once it found the language to be profane and vulgar, it has in fact moved away from the requirements of obscenity under section 67 of the it act. the high court failed to notice the inherent contradiction in its conclusions.36. no objective consideration: third, the high court has erred in the legal approach ..... judgment are as follows:44. ibid, para 32. 45 (1988) 1 scc668 1988 insc44 46 directorate general of doordarshan (supra), para 37. 47 ibid, para 38. 48 (2007) 1 scc143 2006 insc995 26 i. obscenity must be judged with regard to contemporary mores and national standards.49 ii. the work must be judged as a whole and the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... said orders passed by the authorities and by the high court cannot be brushed aside merely because the said declarations were deemed to be void under section 193 of the finance act, 2016. the said proceedings clearly substantiates the case of the respondent ed as alleged in the prosecution complaint under the pmla.30. having regard to ..... note that the appellants- vaibhav jain and ankush jain had sought to avail of the income declaration scheme, 2016 (ids) by filing separate declarations under section 183 of the finance act, 2016 in form-i on 27.09.2016, in which both of the said appellants had individually declared an income of rs.8,26,91,750/- ..... by the appellants under the ids declarations belonged to the appellant- satyendar jain, and the said ids declarations were rejected by the income tax authorities under section 193 of the finance act, 2016 on the ground of misrepresentation and suppression of facts. the said order was upheld by the high court and the supreme court. (vi) the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... was remanded to police custody till 18.06.2015. 3 closed-circuit television. 46. on 17.06.2015, the investigating agency prepared a memorandum under section 27 of the indian evidence act, 1872 showing recovery of rs.30,000/- (rupees thirty thousand) from the house of the appellant.7. on 18.06.2015, the investigating agency ..... submitted that one of the grounds for not directing criminal prosecution of respondent no.2 by the high court was that section 1615, maharashtra police act, 1951 (hereinafter 5 161. suits or prosecutions in respect of acts done under colour of duty as aforesaid not to be entertained or to be dismissed if not instituted within the prescribed ..... paraded him half-naked with a garland of shoes.20. learned counsel submitted that in terms of section 161 of the police act, prosecution against a police officer acting under colour of official duty after six months of the alleged act cannot be 14 entertained and rightly the high court has declined to direct any action on such .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... of the right to information of citizens under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution. the amendments which were introduced by the finance act 2017 to the provisions of the companies act 2013, permitting unlimited funding of political parties by corporate entities were held to be arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the ..... a judgment dated 15 february 20241, this court declared the electoral bond scheme and the provisions of the finance act 2017 which amended the provisions of the representation of people act 1951 and the income tax act 1961, unconstitutional on the ground that the non-disclosure of information regarding the funding of political parties is ..... khanna]. .. .... ........ . ........j.[b r gavai]. .. .... ........ . ........j.[j b pardiwala]. .. .... ........ . ........j.[manoj misra]. new delhi; march 11, 2024 ckb11ma4862024 item no.301+302+305 court no.1 section pil-w s u p r e m e c o u r t o f i n d i a record of proceedings miscellaneous application no.486/2024 in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... of the right to information of citizens under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution. the amendments which were introduced by the finance act 2017 to the provisions of the companies act 2013, permitting unlimited funding of political parties by corporate entities were held to be arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the ..... a judgment dated 15 february 20241, this court declared the electoral bond scheme and the provisions of the finance act 2017 which amended the provisions of the representation of people act 1951 and the income tax act 1961, unconstitutional on the ground that the non-disclosure of information regarding the funding of political parties is ..... khanna]. .. .... ........ . ........j.[b r gavai]. .. .... ........ . ........j.[j b pardiwala]. .. .... ........ . ........j.[manoj misra]. new delhi; march 11, 2024 ckb11ma4862024 item no.301+302+305 court no.1 section pil-w s u p r e m e c o u r t o f i n d i a record of proceedings miscellaneous application no.486/2024 in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... of the right to information of citizens under article 19(1)(a) of the constitution. the amendments which were introduced by the finance act 2017 to the provisions of the companies act 2013, permitting unlimited funding of political parties by corporate entities were held to be arbitrary and violative of article 14 of the ..... a judgment dated 15 february 20241, this court declared the electoral bond scheme and the provisions of the finance act 2017 which amended the provisions of the representation of people act 1951 and the income tax act 1961, unconstitutional on the ground that the non-disclosure of information regarding the funding of political parties is ..... khanna]. .. .... ........ . ........j.[b r gavai]. .. .... ........ . ........j.[j b pardiwala]. .. .... ........ . ........j.[manoj misra]. new delhi; march 11, 2024 ckb11ma4862024 item no.301+302+305 court no.1 section pil-w s u p r e m e c o u r t o f i n d i a record of proceedings miscellaneous application no.486/2024 in .....
Tag this Judgment!