Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... . the provisions of main enactment as also the rules framed thereunder have been complete violated while framing assessment orders. definition of 'land' as given in section 38 (c) of the rajasthan finance act, 2006 has also not been taken into consideration. the provisional assessment lists were finalised without considering the objections submitted by the petitioners and without s.b. ..... including the rules framed thereunder has already been upheld by this court.4. the coordinate bench of this court (jaipur bench) in s.b.c.w.p. no.9972/2007- mohd. jamil vs. state of rajasthan & ors., decided on 04.03.2011 and other connected writ petitions, has held has under: so far as the objection of ..... requirement of rule 5, supra. moreover, the government could not retrospectively by notice u/s. 42 (4) dated 23.2.2007 make the assessment orders effective from 25.9.2006, the date on which the act was enforced because an assessment order can be passed only after s.b.c.w.p. no.2231/2009 m/s shiva mines .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... . the provisions of main enactment as also the rules framed thereunder have been complete violated while framing assessment orders. definition of 'land' as given in section 38 (c) of the rajasthan finance act, 2006 has also not been taken into consideration. the provisional assessment lists were finalised without considering the objections submitted by the petitioners and without s.b. ..... including the rules framed thereunder has already been upheld by this court.4. the coordinate bench of this court (jaipur bench) in s.b.c.w.p. no.9972/2007- mohd. jamil vs. state of rajasthan & ors., decided on 04.03.2011 and other connected writ petitions, has held has under: so far as the objection of ..... requirement of rule 5, supra. moreover, the government could not retrospectively by notice u/s. 42 (4) dated 23.2.2007 make the assessment orders effective from 25.9.2006, the date on which the act was enforced because an assessment order can be passed only after s.b.c.w.p. no.11750/2009 vijay kumar sharma .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... any restriction has been put on the rights to carry on trade or business; amendments have been made in exercise of the powers conferred by sections 41 & 42 read with section 76 of the forest act; revision of fee cannot in any manner be said to be illegal or arbitrary. shri a.k.khatri, learned counsel appearing on behalf ..... to allow free play to the government to evolve fiscal policy in the public interest and to act upon the same. equally, the government is left free to determine priorities in the matters of allocations or allotments or utilization of its finances in the public interest. it is equally entitled, 11 therefore to issue or withdraw or modify ..... to allow free play to the government to evolve fiscal policy in the public interest and to act upon the same. equally, the government is left free to determine priorities in the matters of allocations or allotments or utilization of its finances in the public interest. it is equally entitled, therefore, to issue or withdraw or modify the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... notices issued against it for assessment year 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 in which demand of approximately rs.64.30 lacs has been raised against the said company manufacturing cement, as a consequence of amendment brought in section 8 of the cst act, 1956 including section 8(5) of the said act by finance act no.20/2002 with effect from 11.5.2002 prohibiting the ..... state government to dispense with requirement of furnishing declaration in form c/d for the dealers to avail concessional rate of cst under section 8(4) of the act. s.b. civil writ ..... by notfn no.f.4(72)fd/gr.iv/81-18 dated 6.5.1986 as amended from time to time (s.no.625).5.section 8 of the cst act as amended by finance actno.20/2002 with effect from 11.5.2002 is also reproduced herein below for ready reference:prior to amendment after amendment8.rates of tax on .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... arises for consideration of this court and, therefore, the appeal deserves to be dismissed on this count alone. we have considered the rival submissions made at the bar. provisions of section 153(1) before the amendment made by the finance act, 1989 w.e.f. 01.04.1989 reads as under:- 6 no order of assessment shall be made u/s 143 or ..... sec. 144 at any time after- (a) expiry of (i) four years from the end of the a.y. in which the income was first assessable, where such a.y. is ..... hon'ble mr. justice arun bhansali reportable mr. k.k. bissa, for the appellant. mr. anjay kothari, for the respondent. ---- by the court: this appeal under section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 ('the act') has been filed by the department aggrieved against the order dated 10.05.2004 passed by the income tax appellate tribunal, jodhpur bench, jodhpur ('the tribunal'), whereby .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... rule 10 of the multi-state cooperative societies rules, 2002 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the rules ) and thus, is beyond the purview of section 65(105)(zm) read with section 65(12) of the finance act, 1994, had preferred belated appeals against the order dated 21.3.2011 passed by the learned commissioner (appeals), central excise, jaipur-ii before the learned tribunal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... society engaged in the business of banking and providing credit facilities. it was by virtue of insertion of sub- section (4) by finance act, 2006 with effect from 01.04.2007 that the provisions of section 80p were made inapplicable in relation to any co-operative bank other than the primary agriculture credit society or primary co ..... -operative agriculture and rural development bank. apparently, the claim for this deduction in the assessment year 2007-08 had been ..... members and public in general. the assessee had earlier been claiming, and was being allowed, deduction under section 80p(2) of the act for being eligible therefor. the assessee also claimed the similar deduction for the assessment year 2007-08, which has not been allowed by the assessing officer [ the ao ].due to change in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... within two weeks of the receipt of the order, failing which the appeal would be liable for rejection for non-compliance of the provisions of section 35f of the central excise act, 1944 read with section 83 of the finance act, 1994.3. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is strong prima facie case in favour of the petitioner, therefore, the direction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... within two weeks of the receipt of the order, failing which the appeal would be liable for rejection for non-compliance of the provisions of section 35f of the central excise act, 1944 read with section 83 of the finance act, 1994.3. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is strong prima facie case in favour of the petitioner, therefore, the direction .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... from the post of junior personal assistant to personal assistant accompanied by increments under rule 26a of the 1951 rules recommended by the finance department of the state and acted upon by the respondent-high court, so as to purportedly remedy the pay anomaly precipitated by the merger of these two posts by ..... rajasthan high court (other than specifically mentioned in sections 'b' & 'd').the following entries, as relevant, were enumerated :- 15 ....s.no.name of the existing pay running grade grade remarks post pay scale ..... grade pay scale band stenographer 5500-9000 pb-2 9300-34800 3600 personal 5500-9000 pb-2 9300-34800 assistant 3600 in sub-clause (ii) of section c . of schedule i of the 2008 rules dealing in common posts in government secretariat, rajasthan public service commission, governor's secretariat, lokayukta sachivalaya, .....
Tag this Judgment!