Court : Karnataka
..... the maintenance contemplated under the 2007 act includes a provision for food, clothing, residence and medical attendance, and treatment in section 2(b)7. in fact, even a childless senior citizen (a person aged above 60 years) is entitled to ..... senior citizens act, 2007 under which not only a parent but a grandparent could also claim maintenance from their children under 4 k. kumar v. smt. leena & anr., air2010kar 75. 5 chandi samuval v. saimon samual, mat.appeal no.782 of 2022.-. 21 - nc:2024. khc:38401 mfa no.11440 of 2011 c/w mfa no.206 of 2018 section 46. ..... seek maintenance from his relative (i.e., a person who would inherit the property of the senior citizen).33. it is clear from the provisions of the 2007 act that the law has recognised the obligation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... the maintenance contemplated under the 2007 act includes a provision for food, clothing, residence and medical attendance, and treatment in section 2(b)7. in fact, even a childless senior citizen (a person aged above 60 years) is entitled to ..... senior citizens act, 2007 under which not only a parent but a grandparent could also claim maintenance from their children under 4 k. kumar v. smt. leena & anr., air2010kar 75. 5 chandi samuval v. saimon samual, mat.appeal no.782 of 2022.-. 21 - nc:2024. khc:38401 mfa no.11440 of 2011 c/w mfa no.206 of 2018 section 46. ..... seek maintenance from his relative (i.e., a person who would inherit the property of the senior citizen).33. it is clear from the provisions of the 2007 act that the law has recognised the obligation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... seeking impleadment, setting aside of abatement and condonation of delay in moving the applications. the trial court on inquiry held a sufficient cause within the meaning of section 5 of the limitation act and rule 9 of order 22 cpc to be made out; directed the delay in moving the 10 (2006) 9 scc749- 38 - nc:2024. khc ..... and willingness to perform the agreement and the alleged breach by the defendant. but balraj singh cannot become a substitute for the plaintiff to give evidence about the finances or intentions or the readiness and willingness of the plaintiff which were within the personal knowledge of the plaintiff. balraj singh was a property dealer engaged by the ..... to the petitioner to appear and contest the case. it has to be noticed that the suit seeking possession from the tenant was initially filed in the year 2007. it was transferred to small causes court in the year 2011. despite service of summons, the tenant-respondent herein does not bother to appear. after ten months .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... the appellant no.1 to its office in kolkata where the ed has the zonal office. vii. the department of revenue, ministry of finance has issued administrative instructions consistent with section 51 of pmla that demarcate the specific territorial jurisdiction of various zonal offices of the ed. the said instructions must be strictly complied ..... directions issued by the central government for the purpose of exercise of powers and performance of the functions by the authorities as contemplated in section 51 of the said act. as stated in the said report, the said offices of the directorate of enforcement all over india are set up to ensure that ..... the money laundering offences are investigated in an effective manner and they act as deterrence for the potential offenders of the money launderers. pertinently, the headquarters investigation unit (hiu) has not been restricted to any territorial jurisdiction in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... development authority respondent(s) with civil appeal no.6344 of2024judgment vikram nath, j.1. civil appeals 2809-2810 of 2024, by the appellant filed under section 23 of the consumer protection act, 19861, read with order xxiv of the supreme court rules, assail the correctness of the final judgment and order dated 15.09.2023 passed by the ..... dated 21.10.2011, attached two cheques, one by the appellant of rs.6.94 lakhs and the other of rs.45 lakhs issued by the lic housing finance limited. possession was to be given within six months under the scheme.4. upon completion of six months, the appellant requested for possession vide communication dated 03.04 ..... that the complaint was barred by limitation, claiming that the complaint was filed on 10.07.2020, well beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed under section 24a of the consumer protection act, 1986, which mandates that a complaint must be filed within two years from the date on which the cause of action arises. ada argued that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... up employment abroad or within india. these rules shall not apply in cases of employment in the service of any public sector undertaking, aided schools and private colleges or self financing colleges within the state or anybody incorporated or not, which is wholly or substantially owned, controlled or aided by any state government or the government of india.1. 2. 3 ..... services (classification, control and appeal) rules, 1960 15. procedure for imposing major penalties.- (1) without prejudice to the provisions of the public servants' (inquiry) act, 1850 (central act xxxvii of 1850), and the public servants' (inquires) act, 1122 (act xi of 1122), no order imposing on a government servant any of the penalties specified in items (v) to (ix) of rule 11 (1) shall .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... sufficient indication on whom the liability for compensation would fall.14. in godavari finance company v. degala satyanarayanamma & ors.9 a question arose whether a financier would be an owner of a motor vehicle within the meaning of section 2(30)10 of the m. v. act, 1988. in that case, the accident took place on 29.5.1995 ..... awarded, the claimants (r 1 to r 4) preferred miscellaneous appeal (civil) no.1147/2017 before the high court; whereas vide miscellaneous appeal (civil) no.1306/2007, the dealer (i.e., the appellant herein) questioned the award to the extent it made him jointly and severally liable for payment of the compensation.8. both the ..... .2. this appeal impugns the judgment and order of the high court of chhattisgarh at bilaspur1 dated 15.11.2017, whereby miscellaneous appeal (civil) no.1306 of 2007 filed by the appellant was dismissed and miscellaneous appeal (civil) no.1147/2017 filed by the claimant(s) was allowed thereby enhancing the compensation already awarded to them .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... not alter its substance or legality. it is the further contention of the bmrcl that the arbitral tribunal's 19 decision to award finance charges lacked basis in evidence, thus warranting interference under section 34 of the act. in this regard, he has referred to a reliance in the case of state of rajasthan v. ferro concrete construction co. ..... award which is indicated in the matter of arbitration in respect of adjudication of disputes under contract agreement no.bmrcl/via/e-w/r1/1 dated 15.02.2007 28 wherein three arbitrators had taken up the issues relating to the claimant namely, navayuga engineering company ltd. and the respondent namely, bmrcl, it is seen ..... agency reported in (2009) 16 scc504(paragraph33) 7. ranjit singh vs state of madhya pradesh; (2013) 16 scc797(paragraph27) 17 8. shiv kumar sharma vs santosh kumari; (2007) 8 scc600(paragraphs 21 and22) 9. dayal singh and others vs union of india and others; (2003) 2 scc593(paragraph 31 to33) 10. j.c.bhudharaja v. chairman, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... not alter its substance or legality. it is the further contention of the bmrcl that the arbitral tribunal's 19 decision to award finance charges lacked basis in evidence, thus warranting interference under section 34 of the act. in this regard, he has referred to a reliance in the case of state of rajasthan v. ferro concrete construction co. ..... award which is indicated in the matter of arbitration in respect of adjudication of disputes under contract agreement no.bmrcl/via/e-w/r1/1 dated 15.02.2007 28 wherein three arbitrators had taken up the issues relating to the claimant namely, navayuga engineering company ltd. and the respondent namely, bmrcl, it is seen ..... agency reported in (2009) 16 scc504(paragraph33) 7. ranjit singh vs state of madhya pradesh; (2013) 16 scc797(paragraph27) 17 8. shiv kumar sharma vs santosh kumari; (2007) 8 scc600(paragraphs 21 and22) 9. dayal singh and others vs union of india and others; (2003) 2 scc593(paragraph 31 to33) 10. j.c.bhudharaja v. chairman, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... courts come to a conclusion about the existence or non-existence of disputed facts. though, in the definition of the word evidence given in section 3 of the evidence act one finds only oral and documentary evidence, this word is also used in phrases such as best evidence, circumstantial evidence, corroborative evidence, derivative ..... the memorandum recorded in writing creates rights, liabilities or extinguishes those, the same requires registration. 14.3. in our opinion, the letter of the finance commissioner would apply in cases where the instrument of deposit of title deeds incorporates the terms and conditions in addition to what flows from the 23 mortgage ..... an usufructuary mortgage, an english mortgage or a mortgage by deposit of title-deeds within the meaning of this section is called an anomalous mortgage. (emphasis supplied) 27. in syndicate bank v estate officer & manager, apiic ltd., (2007) 8 scc361 this court held: 28. the requisites of an equitable mortgage are : (i) a debt; .....
Tag this Judgment!