Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2007 section 127 amendment of section 32n Sorted by: recent Court: jharkhand Page 2 of about 46 results (0.179 seconds)

Sep 13 2017 (HC)

Smt Sarojni Kisku Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Others

Court : Jharkhand

..... therefore, under such circumstances, a legal opinion was sought for from the government pleader, district-sahibganj and in the legal opinion, he has clearly written that the finance department's letter dated 06.09.1996 envisages that second wife is not entitled to get pension, if the first wife is alive but the minor children of the ..... amount mentioned therein. so far as the amount of gratuity is concerned, as per the jharkhand pension rules, adoption of bihar pension rules appendix v, part ii, section iii, the amount of gratuity will be paid to the nominee concerned but the deceased employee vide declaration (annexure-b to the counter affidavit filed by the state) ..... & ors as reported in (2000) 2 scc431has held that during the lifetime of the first wife, second marriage is void under the provisions of the hindu marriage act but the illegitimate children born out of the second marriage are entitled to death-cum-retiral dues alongwith the wife and the family pension would be admissible to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2017 (HC)

Omkar Ram and Anr Vs. Education

Court : Jharkhand

..... recognised special minority aided school and all the expenses towards salary and retiral benefits of the teaching and non-teaching staffs appointed against sanctioned posts are being financed and funded by the state government from public exchequer. pursuant to the advertisement dated 25.12.2010, petitioners being b.a. and having special professional ..... was not taken, in my opinion may not be sufficient justification to terminate services of the petitioner. (vi) the condition of service imposed by any act or rule, cannot have retrospective effect and as such, condition of passing tet examination which was adopted by the state and became effective from 05.09. ..... government officials, duly competent and duly authorised in that behalf, have arrived honestly at one decision, their successor-in-office, after the decision has been acted upon and is in effective operation, cannot purport to enter upon a reconsideration of the matter and to arrive at another and totally different decision. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 01 2017 (HC)

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... of jharkhand through its chief secretary, govt. of jharkhand (ii) the principal secretary, health, medical education and family welfare, govt. of jharkhand (iii) the principal secretary, department of finance, govt. of jharkhand (iv) the director-in-chief, health services, jharkhand (v) the director, national rural health mission, jharkhand (vi) the director, rims, ranchi (vii) ..... reports also point out to a much deeper issue relating to under nutrition of the pregnant mothers, more particularly belonging to the lower, downtrodden and poor section of the societies, which cause birth of under nutritioned infants, many times premature birth also.10. we have also been informed that the issues relating to ..... -4- 14. post the matter on 18th september, 2017. let the matter be placed before the appropriate bench with permission of hon'ble the acting chief justice. copy of the entire records be supplied to the office of learned advocate general today itself. (aparesh kumar singh, j.) (b.b.mangalmurti, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 19 2017 (HC)

Surendra Rai and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

..... same was confirmed by the revenue officer, deoghar. the said fact indicates that the concerned authority has already complied with the provisions of section 11 of the act. it is also submitted that the father of the respondent nos. 6 and 7 namely, kaleshwar rai filed an appeal being bhoodan appeal ..... one had filed any objection in that regard. the said fact goes to show that there was proper publication of the danpatra under section 11 of the act. it is also submitted that the learned commissioner erred in holding that the donor had given names of four persons in the ..... rai, churaman rai and munsi rai were the sons of one of the recorded tenant most. dewani ghatwalin. as per the provisions of section 10 of the act, the donors raj keshar rai, churaman rai and munsi rai donated 5.73 acres of land of j.b. no. 53 to ..... 1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (c) no. 1866 of 2007 1. surendra rai 2. anant lal rai 3. bhartu rai all sons of late ramkeshar rai, resident of village morney, p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2017 (HC)

Amr Dev Prabha Through Its Power of Attorney Holder Mithilesh Kumar Si ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... notification dated 28-7-1992 mr b.r. nair became the director general of telecommunication. as such, he could exercise all the powers under section 3(6) of the indian telegraphs act of 1885. such a telecom authority has the right to grant cellular operating licences to the successful party and also reject any bids without assigning ..... or favouritism. however, it must be clearly stated that there are inherent limitations in exercise of that power of judicial review. government is the guardian of the finances of the state. it is expected to -26- protect the financial interest of the state. the right to refuse the lowest or any other tender is always ..... the said judgment referred to by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner. in the case of jagdish mandal vs. state of orissa & ors. reported in (2007) 14 scc517(supra), the question of judicial review was under consideration and reference has been made to the following paragraphs:22. judicial review of administrative action is intended .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 2017 (HC)

Subodh Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

..... managing director in a company, 3 his continuation as managing director was challenged by the respondents after his conviction in view of provision of section 267 of the companies act,1956. section 267 of the companies act, provides disqualification in the sense that it says that no person, who has suffered a conviction by a court of an offence involving ..... whole-time director in the company. apex court in this case dealt with the question whether appellant was liable to be visited with the consequences of section 267 of the companies act, notwithstanding the interim order passed by the high court while admitting the appellant's appeal against his conviction and sentence. in addressing this question apex ..... 5 s.c.c600 rama narang vs. ramesh narang and ors, reported in (1995) 2 s.c.c513 ravikant s. patil vs. sarvabhouma s. bagali, reported in (2007)1 s.c.c673to boost up his case as to why his conviction should be suspended. 6 i have heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as state and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2017 (HC)

Riaz Khan Faridi Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Central Bureau of ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... actual requirement and without observing the formalities necessary to be followed. the fund was allotted in the national rural -2- health mission ( nrhm) and was financed by the government of india. it is alleged that more amount was spent than the allocated budget. further allegation has been made that medicines and equipments have ..... submitted that the petitioner had adopted delaying tactics in prolonging the trial. learned counsel submits that discretion lies with the magistrate for consideration of an application under section 205 cr.p.c. and the discretion has been exercised by the learned court below in a judicious manner refusing to accede to the prayer of ..... 2009-ahd(r). after investigation, chargesheet was submitted and cognizance was taken under sections 120b, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the indian penal code and section 13(i)(c)13(i) (d) read with section 13 (2) of the prevention of corruption act. the petitioner being one of the accused had challenged the entire criminal proceeding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2017 (HC)

Bhagirath Keshri Vs. Jharkhand Gramin Bank Through Its Chairman and Or ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... in sanctioning/disbursement of the loans and advances to the extent that the petitioner extended loans to non-existent businesses, sanctioned the loans without assessing credit needs, financed the loan to more than one members of the 6 family for the same business, obtained defective documents and assets purchased from bank's loan kept uninsured ..... for different purpose and they are living separately and they do not belong to same family to negate charge no. 5, wherein it is alleged that undue financing was extended to more than one number of families for the same trade/business/shop. but, brushing aside these clinching piece of evidence, impugned order of ..... or witness, the answer was given in negative. learned senior counsel for the petitioner further submitted that in banking sector, trust is of paramount consideration, and act of the petitioner amounts to breach of trust and confidence. so far quantum of punishment is concerned, it is in commensurate with the proved charges, which never .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2017 (HC)

Samir Rastogi Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through C B I

Court : Jharkhand

..... common order as all these cases arising out of same case being r.c.no.12(a)/2014-r, registered under section 120b, 420, 468, 471 read with section 13(2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of the p.c. act. the brief facts of the case is that one s.k.khare, superintendent of police/hob, cbi, acb ranchi ..... terms and conditions were given to the participating architects. certain clarifications were also issued and mode of award of marks was clarified as below:- design :80. experience :15. finance :05. thus, it is further disclosed that maximum weightage was given on design. further clarifications for the architects was also issued wherein it was mentioned that as per the ..... and central university having succeeded in inviting 27 architects and decided as a policy to short list those architects who have secured 50% or above marks in first section process. this short listing of the reputed firms from amongst numbering 27 by giving an intelligible criteria of securing more than 50% marks was a conscious decision to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2017 (HC)

Anil Dikshit Vs. State of Jharkhand Through the Central Bureau of Inve ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... common order as all these cases arising out of same case being r.c.no.12(a)/2014-r, registered under section 120b, 420, 468, 471 read with section 13(2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of the p.c. act. the brief facts of the case is that one s.k.khare, superintendent of police/hob, cbi, acb ranchi ..... terms and conditions were given to the participating architects. certain clarifications were also issued and mode of award of marks was clarified as below:- design :80. experience :15. finance :05. thus, it is further disclosed that maximum weightage was given on design. further clarifications for the architects was also issued wherein it was mentioned that as per the ..... and central university having succeeded in inviting 27 architects and decided as a policy to short list those architects who have secured 50% or above marks in first section process. this short listing of the reputed firms from amongst numbering 27 by giving an intelligible criteria of securing more than 50% marks was a conscious decision to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //