Court : Chennai Madurai
..... in nutshell, are as under:- the case was registered in crime no.288 of 2016 on 16.09.2016, for the offence under section 379 of ipc., r/w section 21(1) of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957, against the petitioner herein and three others by the respondent police. the fir reveals the fact that on 16.09.2016 at ..... respondent police. the petitioner has stated in his petition before the court below that the original r.c.book of the vehicle in question is in possession of 'shriram transport finance company' for the loan obtained by the revision petitioner and hence, he filed the xerox copy of the r.c. book, which is in the name of the revision ..... an undertaking that he will not use the vehicle for any illegal activities in future (iv) the judicial magistrate shall call for the original r.c.book from the said finance company, who is in possession of the original r.c.book, as stated by the petitioner herein, for perusal, if the magistrate has any doubt in genuineness of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... educational institutions and medical institutions. 34. insofar as the present case is concerned, in the year 2012, three self-finance vacancies arose at scott christian college for the post of assistant professor in the history department. 35. in pursuance of a ..... the second respondent and the revision petitioner seeking the relief of:- (a) declaration that the clause incorporated in chapter xxiv section 60.4 b and c of the amended constitution to alter the seniority list once in three months is illegal and ..... in the decision reported in eka ratchagar sabai higher secondary school, rep. by its correspondent, salaiputhur, asirvathapuram (po), tuticorin district, (2007-4l.w.617), first cited supra, a division bench of this court at paragraph 14 has observed as under :- 14. as ..... the village community from maintaining a suit in his own right in respect of a wrong done to him though the act complained of may also be injurious to some other villagers. ? 18. it is thus made clear in the above cited .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... district judge, dindigul, formulated necessary points for consideration and allowed the first appeals holding that the respondent has rebutted the presumption as contemplated under section 118 of the negotiable instruments act. the learned additional district judge also held that within the short period of nine months, there was no necessity for the respondent to borrow such ..... has no force, as it is proved that m/s.renganathan finance is in the habit of issuing receipt for the amounts received and returning the promissory note after entire loan is discharged. apart from the interested evidence of ..... them. this evidence destroys the case of the respondent, who has stated that he has paid rs.21,500/- towards interest to the m/s.renganathan finance, but did not receive any receipt and after repayment of entire loan amount, the promissory notes executed by him were not returned to him. this contention .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... district judge, dindigul, formulated necessary points for consideration and allowed the first appeals holding that the respondent has rebutted the presumption as contemplated under section 118 of the negotiable instruments act. the learned additional district judge also held that within the short period of nine months, there was no necessity for the respondent to borrow such ..... has no force, as it is proved that m/s.renganathan finance is in the habit of issuing receipt for the amounts received and returning the promissory note after entire loan is discharged. apart from the interested evidence of ..... them. this evidence destroys the case of the respondent, who has stated that he has paid rs.21,500/- towards interest to the m/s.renganathan finance, but did not receive any receipt and after repayment of entire loan amount, the promissory notes executed by him were not returned to him. this contention .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... to the government, home (courts) department, chennai / respondent no.4, to take appropriate action on the proposals in coordination with the principal secretary, finance department, chennai / respondent no.5 and ventilate the grievance of the differently abled persons, at the earliest, preferably, within a period of two months from ..... 10 lakhs. 6. a revised estimate for rs.34.10 lakhs has been prepared by the assistant executive engineer, public works department, building (candm), section no.1, paramakudi, ramanathapuram and accordingly, a letter dated 22.04.2016 has been addressed to the learned principal district judge, ramanathapuram. difficulty expressed by ..... and thus, the differently abled persons, suffer a lot. attention of this court was also invited to section 46 of the persons with disabilities, (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995, which states that the appropriate governments and the local authorities shall, within the limits of their .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... same in karur vysya bank, jeeyarpuram branch, in his name. dw4 has stated that he was running a pawn broker shop at kulumani under the name and style of bhakiyalakshmi finance. he has further stated that one mr.manivel had pledged jewels in his shop on 15.04.2012 and returned the same on 20.06.2012. (o) dw5 has stated ..... second accused, a criminal case was registered on the file of edamalaipatti pudur police station in crime no.88 of 2012 under sections 294-b, 394 and 307 ipc and under section 4 of the prohibition of harassment of women act. then, pws,1 and 2 and the deceased were arrested and lodged in prison for some time and later on, released on ..... all the accused to the court and handed over all the material objects also to the court. on his request, pw11 recorded the statement of pws.1 and 2 under sections 164 cr.p.c. at his request, the material objects were sent for chemical examinations. the report revealed that there were bloodstains on the material objects, including the aruval .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... land to show cause as to why the land should not be acquired. furthermore, even under the land acquisition act, an objection under section 5 is to be received against acquisition and the same to be considered. 4. at this stage, a cursory perusal of the contents of the writ affidavit filed ..... engineer proceedings in na.ka.no.8978/2015/oo3 dated 04.02.2016 and total amount for the work order is fixed as rs.72 lakhs under the panchayat nabard finance scheme 2015-16. in fact, the fifth respondent is the successful bidder in the tender and hence, work order was issued to her on 25.02.2016. later, ..... at c.pudupatty, uthamapalayam taluk, theni district, it would not hamper her agricultural activity. 3. the stand of the petitioner is that section 3(2) of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for industrial purposes act, 1997 provides for issuance of notice by the government calling upon the owner of the land it proposes to acquire or interested in such .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... /writ petitioner carries the business of custom house agents (in short 'cha') and to carry out this agency work, he obtained license in the year 2004 under section 146 of the customs act 1962 and chalr 2004 regulations. the nature of the activities carried on by the said concern is relating to entry or departure of a conveyance or the import ..... or revoke the license and require the said cha to submit within 30 days..... in paragraph no.26 of the order, this court stated the government of india, ministry of finance(department of revenue), central board of excise and customs, new delhi has issued issued circular no.9/2010-cus., dated 08.04.2010 in f.no.502/2008-cus ..... of the show cause notice and therefore, found that the show cause notice was issued beyond the period of 90 days from the date of offence report as stipulated under section 22(1) of chalr and therefore, quashed the show cause notice vide his order, dated 04.01.2013 and challenging the legality of the same, the revenue has filed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... in the scheme of things provided in the code, the trial in the court of session is conducted only by a public prosecutor or special public prosecutor section 15 of the act also provides for conducting cases in special court by a special public prosecutor. no mention, on the other hand is made of special public prosecutor in sub ..... the sc/st (poa) rules, 1995. the said order is under challenge in this writ petition. 3. according to the respondents, in terms of section 15 of the sc/st (poa) act, 1989, an existing public prosecutor can be appointed as a special public prosecutor. however, an advocate with seven years bar experience can be appointed as a ..... 07.12.2012 at the instigation of one o.raja, chairman of periyakulam municipality, theni district, who is the younger brother of former chief minister and the present finance minister of tamil nadu mr.o. paneerselvam. it was also submitted that the deceased son of the petitioner had been performing pooja for several years, which was impeded .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai Madurai
..... if recall petition is not entertained how the accused will establish his defence. accused has a constitutional right to defend himself. (see article 22(1), 21 constitution of india and section 303 cr.p.c.) defence must be 'effective' and 'not cosmetic'. effective defence includes right to cross- examine the witness who gave incriminating evidence. it is also part of ..... , 43 and 57. 15. in the circumstances, ordered as under: (1) this revision is allowed. (2) the impugned order of the learned special judge under the prevention of corruption act at sivagangai dated 13.05.2016 passed in cr.m.p.no.137 of 2016 is set aside. (3) the trial court will fix dates for the recalling of p ..... revision. 2. a1 to a3 are being prosecuted in the said calender case for certain i.p.c. offences and also for certain white colour offence under prevention of corruption act. the trial of the case is going on and number of witnesses were examined. now, the i.o. is slated to enter the witness box. 3. at this juncture .....
Tag this Judgment!