Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2007 section 113 amendment of section 156 Sorted by: old Court: chennai madurai Page 1 of about 14 results (0.305 seconds)

Sep 03 2012 (HC)

Dindigul Steel Rolling Mills (P) Ltd., Rep. by Its Manager Vs. the Chi ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... to the judgment of this court reported in 2001- 1 lw (crl) 379 (tneb, etc vs. a.mani and another) to contend that in case of action under section 39 of the electricity act, burden is on the prosecution to show that there was theft of energy. 18. addmittedly, both the said judgments arose under the criminal law and in the present ..... 4347 of 2006 against the electricity board claiming that the proceedings would have to be carried out under the electricity act, 2003. the said writ petition was also allowed. thereafter, the board preferred writ appeal in w.a.no.107 of 2007. the division bench of this court by order dated 05.08.2008 permitted the electricity board to proceed with ..... by the petitioner in w.p.(md).no.2347 of 2009 was that in w.a.no.107 of 2007, this court directed the respondents to proceed with the case as per the old act, notwithstanding the coming into force of the electricity act, 2003. consequent upon the said order, the show cause notice issued in the year 2001 was pursued by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2015 (HC)

C. Chellamuthu Vs. The Deputy Director, Prevention of Money Laundering ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... two division benches of bombay high court and andra pradesh high court referred to above. both the courts after elaborately considering this issue referring to relevant sections of act referred to above held that proceeds of crime in the hands of persons not involved in money laundering or accused of criminal offence can also be ..... m/s. bhagavathi textiles mills. he produced bogus and fabricated documents in connivance of one s. arivarasu, the then business development manager of m/s. global trade finance limited, coimbatore, availed loan facilities to the tune of rupees fifteen crores. on coming to know of this fraud, one b. surendran, vice president and branch ..... ] 108 scl 491 (ap) b.rama raju vs. union of india (uoi) ministry of finance, department of revenue, represented by its secretary, (revenue) and others, wherein in paragraphs 37, 38 and 40, it has been held as follows: 37. section 8(1) clearly postulates affording of an opportunity to a person in possession of proceeds of crime .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2015 (HC)

R. Flower Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Tuticorin and Another

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... taken away by misinterpretation nor it can be misconstrued by the respondents. the proceedings of the lok adalat is under chapter iv of the legal service act and as per section 21 of the act, an award passed by the lok adalt is deemed to be a decree of civil court and every award made by the lok adalat shall be ..... of the country. further, the subsidy admissible to the promoter under the scheme will be kept in the subsidy reserve fund account (borrower-wise) in the books of the financing accounting process. no interest would be charged on this by the bank. it is the central government sponsored scheme by which subsidy is provided to the small farmers provided that ..... first generation educated women entrepreneur. she availed a term loan facility of rs.40.00 lakhs for construction of a rural go-down under nabard subsidy scheme in the year 2007 from the respondent bank. as per the terms and conditions, the loan has to be repaid in 120 monthly installments of rs.33,333/- per month with a holiday .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2015 (HC)

National Textile Corporation Ltd. Vs. Ettappan and Sons, Regd. Partner ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... the revision petitioner. thus, the requirement of the respondents is bona fide. 34. the ingredients prescribed for eviction on the ground mentioned in section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the act have been satisfied in this case. in the circumstances, the appellate authority has rightly varied the order of dismissal passed by the rent controller ..... the refusal of eviction of the respondent-tenant, in spite of the fact that the petitioner-landlord had already obtained licence from the tahsildar for running a finance company for which he requires the petition premises. 22. in the case before us, although the respondents owns other non-residential shops in tirunelveli municipal limits ..... the landlords are requiring the building for their own business. as the landlords are owning other shops, they cannot maintain the eviction petition under section 10(3)(a)(iii) of the act. the landlords are really not in need of the petition mentioned shop. eviction has been sought for an ulterior motive to evict the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2015 (HC)

M/s. First Garment MFG Co.(India) Pvt.Ltd. Vs. The Assistant Commissio ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... long delay, the government will be put to a lot of peril and it will affect the finance position of the government. the section 18 of the act is mandatory in nature that cannot be diluted by mixing it with section 19 of the act, which has no relevance at all. when the petitioners claim input tax credit in the form of ..... thing to be done in a particular manner prescribing the time limit, the petitioners having gone into deep slumber, suddenly cannot claim without complying the provisions of the act. section 19(18) relied on by the petitioner deals with only the trading which is happening within the state / inter-state trade and it cannot be taken into account ..... claim therein directing the respondents to refund the zero rate sales. 6. per contra, mr.r.karthikeyan, the learned additional govt.pleader submitted that as per section 18 of the act, the respective petitioners ought to have claimed the refund of input tax credit on zero rate sales within a period of 180 days from the date of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2015 (HC)

The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation Tamil Nadu ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... judge consequently held that the respondent's husband should be deemed to have been dead from may 1999 onwards on the basis of the presumption available under section 108 of the indian evidence act, 1872. taking such a view, the learned judge held the order of dismissal to be invalid and directed the respondents to settle all terminal benefits ..... seven years from may 1999, it was impossible for him to participate in the enquiry. therefore, the punishment by itself, cannot stand unless the presumption under section 108 of the indian evidence act, 1872 is rebutted by the employer. 24. as a matter of fact, the government itself had taken note of the contingencies of this nature and ..... amended the tamil nadu pension rules, 1978, by g.o.ms.no.540, finance (pension), dated 05.07.1995. rule 49-a inserted by way of amendment, reads as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2015 (HC)

The Correspondent-cum-Secretary, Scott Christian College, Kanyakumari ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... educational institutions and medical institutions. 34. insofar as the present case is concerned, in the year 2012, three self-finance vacancies arose at scott christian college for the post of assistant professor in the history department. 35. in pursuance of a ..... the second respondent and the revision petitioner seeking the relief of:- (a) declaration that the clause incorporated in chapter xxiv section 60.4 b and c of the amended constitution to alter the seniority list once in three months is illegal and ..... in the decision reported in eka ratchagar sabai higher secondary school, rep. by its correspondent, salaiputhur, asirvathapuram (po), tuticorin district, (2007-4l.w.617), first cited supra, a division bench of this court at paragraph 14 has observed as under :- 14. as ..... the village community from maintaining a suit in his own right in respect of a wrong done to him though the act complained of may also be injurious to some other villagers. ? 18. it is thus made clear in the above cited .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2015 (HC)

M. Padmapriya and Others Vs. The Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... relevant to refer to a notification dated 12.11.2009 issued by the ministry of finance (department of financial services), government of india, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clause (cc) of sub-section (2) of section 48 of the life insurance corporation act, 1956 making the rules regulating certain terms and conditions of service relating to business performance ..... government. as already mentioned, when the notification issued by the ministry of finance (department of financial services), government of india dated 12.11.2009 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) read with clause (cc) of subsection (2) of section 48 of the life insurance corporation of india act, 1956 making the life insurance corporation of india development officers (revision of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 14 2015 (HC)

C. Andiappan and Others Vs. The Joint Commissioner, Tamil Nadu Hindu R ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... we are of the considered view that the observance of the principles of natural justice before slapping an order of suspension on a hereditary trustee under section 53(4) of the act pending enquiry into grave charges, is neither feasible nor required. therefore, the third contention of the learned senior counsel for the appellants is also rejected ..... protected by statutes or statutory rules, which occupy the field. the office of trusteeship is not protected by any statutory rule. therefore, before reading into section 53(4) of the act, the principles of natural justice, one has to see whether the office of trusteeship is protected statutorily and if so to what extent. 36. ..... under challenge, in the writ petitions. the first order was one where the hereditary trustees were placed under suspension and charges were framed in terms of section 53 of the act. by the next order, the joint commissioner/executive officer of the temple was himself appointed as the fit person for the endowment. 11. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 2015 (HC)

The Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Madurai Vs. M/s. Strategi ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... by a commissioning and installation agency in relation to erection, commissioning or installation fo plant, machinery or equipment." 12. by section 88 of the finance act, 2005, section 65(39a) was amended. the amended section 65(39a) reads as follows: "(39a) 'erection, commissioning or installation' means any service provided by a commissioning and ..... insulation, (v) lift and escalator, and (vi) such other similar services. 15. therefore, it is clear that before the amendment to section 65(39a) under finance act, 2005, installation of plumbing, drain laying or other installations for transport of fluids was not included within the definition of "erection, commissioning or ..... taxes on untapped service sector. 10. therefore, the services of "commissioning or installation" were brought under the service tax net in the finance act, 2003. section 65(28) defined "commissioning or installation" to mean" any service provided by a commissioning and installation agency in relation to commissioning or .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //