Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2007 chapter i preliminary Sorted by: recent Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 122 results (0.175 seconds)

O.T.G. Global Finance Ltd. and Others Vs. Mohan Mandelia and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2012CrLJ2008

..... help any convict in any other law where other applicable independent provisions are existing as the offence punishable under section 138 of the ni act is distinctly different from the normal offences made punishable under chapter xvii of ipc (i.e. the offences qua property). in the circumstances, it is hereby declared that the compromise arrived ..... . while holding so, it is directed that now, the petitioners/accused no. 2 and 3, namely, janak gandhi managing director and s.s.yadav, director of finance of otg global finance ltd. shall equally be responsible to pay rs. 10,00,000/- (rs. ten lacs) instead of rs. 8,00,000/- (rs. eight lacs). the ..... been aggrieved by an order dated 26th september, 2011. by the aforesaid order, the petitioner/accused no1. otg global finance ltd. company was acquitted of the charges under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act while setting aside the sentence for the alleged offence. however, the conviction recorded by the trial magistrate and affirmed by .....

Jeevan Singh and Another Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... did not fulfill the conditions mentioned in the auction notice and also did not fulfill the statutory requirements of rules of 2009, hence their offer was rejected. the finance department of state of m.p. raised objections in regard to allotment of land in favour of the petitioners. it is further pleaded that in the auction ..... krishi upaj mandi adhiniyam 1972, hereinafter referred as adhiniyam of 1972, was issued for the purpose of establishment of market an auction was held in the year of 2007 for allotment of plots in the newly establishment. aforesaid auction was cancelled. again on 18.12.2009, vide advertisement dated 18.12.2009 the mandi committee invited ..... the case, the respondent-company ioc is an organ of the state or an instrumentality of the state as contemplated under article 12 of the constitution. the state acts in its executive power under article 298 of the constitution in entering or not entering in contracts with individual par- ties. article 14 of the constitution would .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s Mechmen 11-C, Bhopal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... section 158bd. to wit, amity hotels (p) ltd. and others vs. commissioner of income tax and others ((2005) 272 itr 75 (delhi))dated 5.10.2004, new delhi auto finance (p) ltd. vs. joint commissioner of income tax ((2008) 300 itr 83 (delhi))dated 22.2.2008, commissioner of income tax vs. dawn view farms (p) ltd. ((2009 ..... the two decisions of the supreme court are in respect of scope of section 158bd. in the case of manish maheshwari vs. assistant commissioner of income tax and another ((2007) 289 itr 341 (sc))and in the case of commissioner of income tax-iii vs. calcutta knitwears ((2014) 362 itr 673 (sc)). even the tribunal has referred to ..... section 153c is identical or pari materia with the procedure prescribed in section 158bd of the i.t. act. for, section 153c has been placed in chapter xiv which deals with the procedure for assessment, unlike section 158bd is placed in chapter xiv-b which deals with the special procedure for assessment of search cases for block period and undisclosed .....

Chief Municipal Officer Vs. Mahila Munni Devi and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... . it is clear from the terms and conditions that right of ownership was granted in favour of the respondent. in accordance with the provision of section 312 chapter xi of the m.p. municipalities act, 1961 the compromise can only be entered with the permission by the municipal council. no such permission was taken by the president and cmo of nagar panchayat ..... is liable to be set aside. 14. hon'ble supreme court in the case of a. v. papayya sastry and others v. govt, of a.p. and others - (2007) 4 scc 221 : (air 2007 sc 1546) has held as under in regard to 'fraud': 21. now, it is well-settled principle of law that if any judgment or order is obtained by ..... fraud, it cannot be said to be a judgment or order in law. before three centuries, chief justice edward coke proclaimed: "fraud avoids all judicial acts, ecclesiastical or temporal." 22 .....

Major (Retd.) Amar Singh Kwatra and Another Vs. Union Of India Through ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... is being constructed is a(1) defence land. it has also been stated that the boundary wall is being constructed with due approval of the competent authority, financed by the ministry of defence in respect of which the respondents have enclosed administrative approval of the work and the budget allotted. respondents have further stated that sec ..... temporarily used by the golf course at the relevant point of time. it has also been stated that the petitioners have purchased the land only in the year 2007 - 2008 and, therefore, it is incorrect on the part of the petitioners to state that they had an age old access to the army area. the ..... divided in various categories and the relevant statutory provisions governing the field relating to classification of the land under the cantonment act read with cantonment land administration rules, 1937, reads as under : chapter iii classification and management of lands : land use norms and planning for klp purposes 3.0 general management of defence land is a .....

S.D. Tiwariu Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... take a decision. any decision was required to be taken only and only by the aai. the functions of the aai are enumerated in chapter-iii section 12 of the 1994 act, which nowhere describe that only the chairperson of the aai would be required to discharge these functions. meaning thereby since the aai is a body ..... or what were the difficulties felt by the authorities in implementing those recommendations of justice jain committee. however, the krishnamurthy committee gave its report on 30.11.2007 precisely fixing a date of fixation of seniority on merger, on coming into force of the regulations which were framed in the year 2005, by the authority ..... were to be implemented in the manner indicated or as claimed, it would be necessary to look into those provisions and, therefore, provisions of section 18 of the 1994 act is reproduced :- 18. provisions in respect of officers and other employees of the international airports authority and the national airports authority.- (1) (a) every officer or .....

Ramakant Panday Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... proceedings to meet the ends of justice would prevent women from settling earlier. this is not the object of chapter xx-a of ipc. i am satisfied that compromise between both the parties is real and genuine. in view of the fact that offence under sections 498-a ..... smt. chhaya panday was performed on 16.5.2005 at bhopal according to hindu customs.after marriage, due to difference of opinion and living style, since 14.8.2007 applicant no.1 and complainant started living separately. multiple disputes gave rise to different litigations under section 125 of cr.p.c., matrimonial disputes and lodging of report ..... his relatives who harass or torture the wife to coerce her or her relatives to satisfy unlawful demands of dowry. a hypertechnical view would be counterproductive and would act against the interests of women and against the object for which this provision was added. there is every likelihood that non-exercise of inherent power to quash the .....

Sterlite Technologies Ltd Vs. Dhar Industries Ltd

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... petitioner was directed against the order dated 31.7.2010 passed by the council on an application under section 17 of the micro small and medium enterprises development act, 2006 act (referred to as act of 2006) preferred by the respondent for claim of rs.36,32,508/ along with rs.26,15,605/ towards interest.2. the claim by respondent was for .....

Dr. Ashok Kumar Mukherjee Vs. Housing Development Finance Corp.Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... sarat kumar mukherjee 2 dr. smt. sumita mukherjee w/o shri ashok kumar mukherjee both r/o 98.durgawati ward garha jabalpur -versus- respondents:1. housing development finance corp.ltd. through branch manager regional office, capital court munirika outer ring road old palam marg, new delhi 110067 2. dr. smt. krishna banerjee w/o dr ..... interfere while exercising review jurisdiction.4. this revision application is accordingly dismissed. however, a liberty is granted to the applicants to assail the order dated 1.12.2007 by filing necessary proceedings before the appropriate forum. the applicants shall be free to file c.r. no.56/2008 -3- necessary application under section 5 ..... (in short the act of 1925 .). the said application was rejected on some preliminary objection raised by the respondents. thereafter, a review application has been filed by the present applicants praying to review the order dated 1.12.2007 and this application of review has been rejected by the impugned order.3. i have gone .....

Dr.Deochand Bhura Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... with regard to the property or things referred to in the will. the principle governing wordings of the will and its interpretation are laid down in chapter 6 of the indian succession act. it is settled law that in determining the real intention of the testator entire document has to be construed as a whole. no word, phrase ..... originally, in the memorandum of appeal he filed 10 documents. thereafter he filed an application for amendment under order vi rule 17 cpc and subsequently on 14.6.2007 filed his affidavit along with a return of the respondents in the appeal, that is.. of professor c.r. hajarnavis. thereafter he filed an application application under ..... such a submission whereas the original record produced by the learned government advocate goes to show that after the superintendent, land record refused mutation, the petitioner on 03.04.2007 filed a first appeal before the sdo, jabalpur being revenue f.a. no.595/a-06/06-07 (dr. deochand bhura vs. professor charudutt hajarnavis). the .....