Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2006 section 29 amendment of section 115wc Court: customs excise and service tax appellate tribunal cestat kolkata Page 1 of about 14 results (0.585 seconds)

Oct 03 2007 (TRI)

initiating Explosives Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in : (2008)9STR509

..... bharti v. union of india reported at . during the pendency of the refund claim, the provisions of the law were revalidated retrospectively by section 117 of finance act, 2000. in view of the revalidation act, the levy of service tax, during the relevant period, is a valid levy. the commissioner (appeals) followed the decision of the tribunal ..... as to whether the nature of activity carried out by the ici (india) ltd. was clearing and forwarding agent in terms of section 65(25) read with section 65(105)(j) of finance act, 1994. such a controversy was elaborately dealt by tribunal in its different decisions which were not at all before the learned commissioner ( ..... appeals) while passing the impugned order. in paras 7 to 10 of the reported decision in the case of mahavir cenerics v. cce, bangalore 2006 (3) s .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Kar Enterprise Vs. Commissioner of S. Tax, Kolkata

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... construction of roads, but relates to repair and maintenance of roads. we find that in view of the retrospective amendment to the finance act, 1994 by virtue of sections 97 and 98 of the finance act, 2012, no service tax be leviable in respect of management, maintenance and repairing of roads during the period from 16th june, ..... taxable services under the category of commercial or industrial construction servicesunder sub-clause (zzq) of clause (105) of section 65 of the finance act, 1994. the services primarily rendered by them relates to widening of roads and construction of bituminous roads, filling the potholes, depressions etc, with bituminous macadam, ..... the department. 2. this is an application for waiver of predeposit of service tax of rs.3.15 crores and equal amount of penalty imposed under section 78 of the finance act, 1994. 3. it is seen from the record that during the relevant period i.e. from 2005-06 to 2009-10, the applicant provided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2014 (TRI)

M/S. B.S.N.L. Vs. Appearance

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... the appellant before the ld. commissioner (appeal) beyond the statutory period of three months and the condonable period of three months, prescribed under section 85 of finance act, 1994. in view of the judgment of the honble supreme court in the case of singh enterprises (supra), the ld. commr. has no power to condone the ..... months.-in the present case, the appeal was filed by the appellant beyond the statutory period of three months and the condonable period of three months prescribed under section 85 of finance act, 1994. in view of the judgment of the honble supreme court in the case of singh enterprises vs. commr. of c.ex., jamshedpur reported in 2008 ..... cases also, the ld. commr. cannot condone the delay beyond the period of three months in addition to the statutory limit of three months as prescribed under section 85 of the finance act, 1994. it is his submission that the appeals thus liable to be dismissed. 5. we find in the present case, the appeal was filed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Balaji Constructions Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and S. Ta ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... category of construction of roads, but relates to repair and maintenance of roads. he submits that the retrospective amendment to the finance act, 1994, namely, sections 97 and 98, inserted in the finance act, 2012, no service tax be leviable in respect of management, maintenance and repairing of roads for the period from 16th june ..... 03.2010, the applicant provided taxable services under the category of commercial or industrial construction services under sub-clause (zzq) of clause (105) of section 65 of the finance act, 1994. the services primarily rendered by them relates to widening of roads and construction of bituminous roads, filling the potholes, depressions etc, with bituminous ..... predeposit of service tax of rs.1,00,82,008/- and penalty of rs.1,15,00,000/-imposed under section 78, penalty under section 77 and penalty under section 76 (not quantified) of the finance act, 1994. 2. at the outset, the ld. advocate appearing for the applicant, has submitted that during the relevant .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2014 (TRI)

Abhoy Chandra Bakshi Vs. Commr. of Service Tax, Kolkata

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... of the retrospective amendment, vide section 97 and 98 of the finance act, 2012, no service tax is leviable on the repair and maintenance service of roads. 3. per contra, the ld. a.r ..... of the finance act and rs.5,000/- under section 77 of the finance act, 1994. 2. the ld. chartered accountant for the applicant submits that the entire service charges on which demand has been confirmed relates to repair and maintenance of roads/high ways. he submits that the period involved in the present case is from 2005-2006 to 2006-2007. he submits that in view .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Adyant Education Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Central Excise, and S. T ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... to the appellant for pre-deposit of the service tax amount. the appeal filed before the ld. commissioner (appeals) under section 85 of the finance act, 1994 is yet to be decided. in the result, we do not find merit in the appeal filed by the appellant before this tribunal against the order ..... of pre-deposit passed by the ld. commissioner (appeal) under section 35f of cea, 1944 as applicable to service tax cases by virtue of section 83 of the finance act, 1994. in the result, we dismiss the appeal filed by the appellant. however, the appellants are at liberty to ..... before the ld. commr. (appeals) and the appellant have come against the interim order passed under section 35f of cea, 1944 which should not to be entertained by this tribunal, as it is not an order unser section 85 of the finance act, 1994. 4. we find from the impugned order that the ld. commissioner has issued a direction .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Indian Oil Corporation Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... that the demand notice had been confirmed on the ground of failure to discharge the service tax received from the overseas service provider during the period, april, 2006 to march, 2007, under section 66a of the finance act, 1994. the appellant, though claimed before the adjudicating authority and also before the ld. commissioner (appeals) that the service tax demanded against them under the head ..... is an application seeking waiver of predeposit of service tax of rs.15.05 lakh and equal amount of penalty imposed under section 78, penalty imposed under section 76(not quantified) and penalty of rs.5,000/- under section 77, of the finance act, 1994. 2. ld. authorized representative for the applicant submits that the applicants head office had discharged the demand of service tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Technique Unemployed Engineers Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Comm ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... we find that undisputedly, the major portion of the demand i.e. rs.2.07 crores, is covered by the retrospective amendment inserted by virtue of section 97 and 98 of the finance act, 2012 relating to repair and maintenance of road service. both sides agree that the said issue is no more in dispute, hence the demand to ..... relates to services of widening of road, repairing and maintenance of roads etc., rendered during the said period. it is his submission that by virtue of section 97 and 98 of the finance act, 2012, such services are held not be liable to tax retrospectively covering the disputed period. in relation to balance amount, the ld. chartered accountant submits ..... seeking waiver of pre-deposit of service tax of rs.2,57,95,635/- and equal amount of penalty imposed under section 78 and penalty under section 76 (not quantified) and rs.5,000/- penalty under section 77 (2) of finance act, 1994. 2. at the outset, the ld. chartered accountant shri a.k. agarwal for the applicant submits that .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Naihati Jute Mills Company Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excis ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... expenditure, then, they were barred from availing the benefits of modvat credit on the capital goods. i also find that this position has been changed retrospectively by virtue of section 149 of the finance act, 2003. in view of the above retrospective amendment, i do not find any merit in the impugned order and accordingly, the same is set aside. the appeal is ..... shown as revenue expenditure, later, a separate sub-rule was inserted as sub-rule (8) on 01.03.1997. he submits that subsequently by retrospective amendment vide section 149 read with schedule 6 of finance act, 2003, the relevant sub-rule has been amended, thereby giving effect to the extent of incorporating a bar for availing modvat credit on capital goods, if the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2014 (TRI)

M/S. B.S.N.L. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Ranc ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... , j. 1. heard both sides. 2. this is an application for waiver of predeposit of service tax of rs.12.75 crores and equal amount of penalty imposed under section 78 of the finance act, 1994. 3. at the outset, the ld.c.a. appearing for the applicant, has submitted that the issue involved in the present case is similar to the appeals ..... . initially the payment of dot has not been accepted by the department as discharge of their service tax liability since the amount has not been paid to the ministry of finance, deptt. of revenue, after the appellant separated from dot. however, from the orders submitted by the ld.chartered accountant, we find that the commissionerates at jamshedpur and ranchi have accepted .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //