Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2006 section 2 income tax Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Page 5 of about 20,068 results (0.378 seconds)

Jul 25 2024 (HC)

The Bangalore, Bangalore Rural And Vs. The Asst. Commissioner

Court : Karnataka

..... of india (subsidiary banks) act, 1959; (vi) a corresponding new bank constituted under section 3 of the banking companies (acquisition and transfer of undertakings) act, 1970; (vii) the agricultural refinance and development corporation constituted under the agricultural refinance co-operation act, 1963; (viii) the karnataka state agro-industries corporation, a company incorporated under the companies act, 1956; (ix) the agricultural finance corporation limited, a company incorporated ..... under the companies act, 1956; (x) any other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2024 (HC)

Mr. Mohamed Shahid Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... attempt to murder. the issue is that the husband and the mother-in-law were sought to be finished by practice of black magic. therefore, section 3 of the black magic act is invoked. section 3 of the act reads as follows: 3. prevention and eradication of inhuman evil practices and black magic. (1) no person shall himself or through any other person ..... to quash the charge sheet and the entire proceedings in c.c.no.11622/2023 for the alleged offence p/u/s.498-a, 504 r/w sec.34 of ipc and sec.3 and4of dp act registered by the respondent no.1 police (basavanagudi women p.s.,) pending on the file of the learned37h additional cmm court bengaluru vide annexure c and ..... in crime no.251 of 2023. the offences alleged are attempt to murder, cheating, theft, preparation to commit an offence which is punishable beyond three years and section 3 of the black magic act. the registration of the crime in crime no.251 of 2023 has led the wife and her friend before this court in two separate writ petitions.11. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2024 (HC)

Shabaz Masoom Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... attempt to murder. the issue is that the husband and the mother-in-law were sought to be finished by practice of black magic. therefore, section 3 of the black magic act is invoked. section 3 of the act reads as follows: 3. prevention and eradication of inhuman evil practices and black magic. (1) no person shall himself or through any other person ..... to quash the charge sheet and the entire proceedings in c.c.no.11622/2023 for the alleged offence p/u/s.498-a, 504 r/w sec.34 of ipc and sec.3 and4of dp act registered by the respondent no.1 police (basavanagudi women p.s.,) pending on the file of the learned37h additional cmm court bengaluru vide annexure c and ..... in crime no.251 of 2023. the offences alleged are attempt to murder, cheating, theft, preparation to commit an offence which is punishable beyond three years and section 3 of the black magic act. the registration of the crime in crime no.251 of 2023 has led the wife and her friend before this court in two separate writ petitions.11. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2024 (HC)

Smt Afreen Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... attempt to murder. the issue is that the husband and the mother-in-law were sought to be finished by practice of black magic. therefore, section 3 of the black magic act is invoked. section 3 of the act reads as follows: 3. prevention and eradication of inhuman evil practices and black magic. (1) no person shall himself or through any other person ..... to quash the charge sheet and the entire proceedings in c.c.no.11622/2023 for the alleged offence p/u/s.498-a, 504 r/w sec.34 of ipc and sec.3 and4of dp act registered by the respondent no.1 police (basavanagudi women p.s.,) pending on the file of the learned37h additional cmm court bengaluru vide annexure c and ..... in crime no.251 of 2023. the offences alleged are attempt to murder, cheating, theft, preparation to commit an offence which is punishable beyond three years and section 3 of the black magic act. the registration of the crime in crime no.251 of 2023 has led the wife and her friend before this court in two separate writ petitions.11. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2024 (HC)

Abhay Kumar Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... proceedings in c.c.no.24483/2018 registered by sadashivanagar police station, bengaluru (1st respondent) for the offences p/u/s498a), 420 r/w34of ipc and sec. 3 and4of dowry prohibition act, now pending before the xxxix addl.c.m.m., bengaluru. this criminal petition having been heard and reserved for orders on0507.2024, coming on for ..... with the petitioner/husband and therefore, the relationship began to flounder. after floundering of the relationship, the wife institutes several proceedings one invoking section 12 of the protection of women from domestic violence act, 2005, the other is petition for restitution of conjugal rights in m.c.no.2536 of 2015 and the third one is the ..... .c.no.24483 of 2018 arising out of crime in crime no.112 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under sections 498a, 420 read with 34 of the ipc and sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 ( the act for short). 32. the facts, in brief, germane are as follows: the 2nd respondent is the complainant, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 12 2024 (HC)

Smt. Nandini Vs. The D.g. And I.g.p. Of Police

Court : Karnataka

..... activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public order . thrice it has been amended: amending act 22 of 1987, amending act 16 of 2001 and amending act 61 of 2013. section 2 is the dictionary clause of the act. the building block of the act namely acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order is defined very extensively under ..... in charcharkaoui vs canada, 2007 scc9(can) frowned on this. in response, canadian parliament has revised this statute. (iv) in united kingdoms, under section 226a of the criminal justice act, 2003, the secretary of state can continue detention of a person subject to reference & decision of the parole board. in the landmark case of ..... be a punitive order, different - 22 - wphc no.55 of 2024 considerations would have weighed with the court. the immunity clause enacted in section 6a of the act which masks certain arguable irregularities in the orders of detention also supports this stand, in the absence of any challenge to the same. in a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2024 (HC)

D B Jatti Vs. Naraindas Bodaram

Court : Karnataka

..... under:3. 1. respondent launched a criminal prosecution against the revision petitioner for the offence punishable under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act by contending that accused approached the complainant for hand loan in a sum of rs.15,00,000/- during january 2006 with an assurance to repay the same. 3.2. towards repayment, accused passed on cheque bearing no ..... a false case. in his cross-examination, he has answered that he has obtained sum of rs.15,00,000/- as financial assistance through the cheque in the year 2006 from his finance broker namely manoj gera.14. he admits that he has got the accounts in corporation bank, state bank of mysore, state bank of - 7 - nc:2024. khc: ..... the decision of the hon ble high court of andra pradesh in the case of - 12 - nc:2024. khc:26829 crl.rp no.932 of 2021 m/s. krishnam raju finances, hyderabad vs. abida sultana and another reported in 2004 crl. l. j.4019 on the same principal wherein, in paragraph no.17 it has been held as under: 17. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2024 (HC)

Mr. M Subramani Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... additional state public prosecutor would vehemently refute the submissions to contend that filing of additional or supplementary charge sheet is available in law for the prosecution under sub-section (8) of section 173 of the cr.p.c. he would further emphasize on the fact that the prosecution perhaps was not aware of the order of discharge in favour ..... police, and immediately the police came to the spot and questioned the persons present there and it was revealed that the aforesaid subramani had indulged in such illegal act, and he started to make certain claims for which the police asked him to bring all the documents in his custody to the police station the next day. ..... & 16.12.2019 on the basis of the aforesaid documents and also taking advantage of the that i am aged 79 years, they have indulged in the above acts. further, when i visited my property, certain unscrupulous persons again came near my property and threatened me with dire consequences if i did not sell the property and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 05 2024 (HC)

M/s Neria Estates Rural Industries Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... date, the lands in respect of which the petitioner-company claimed occupancy rights, stood transferred to and vested in the state government with the consequences mentioned in sub-section 920 of section 44 of the act. we accordingly record and our finding on point no.1. this finding would be sufficient to dismiss writ appeal no.1867 of 1989. (d) to us, ..... the issue as to whether the appellants still retained interest in the land was not foreclosed. (b) while dismissing appellants w.a.no.124/2006, the co-ordinate bench vide order dated 6.9.2006 at para 6 observed as under: having regard to the contention of the learned aga on behalf of the state-respondent that the land in ..... challenge thereto by the appellants in w.p.no.26764/2000 was negatived vide order dated 6.12.2005; appellants w.a.no.124/2006 against the same also came to be dismissed vide order dated 6.9.2006; - 27 - w.a. no.4312 of 2017 therefore, the question of vesting no longer remains unanswered for being reagitated in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2024 (HC)

H M Mahadevappa Vs. P Lokesha

Court : Karnataka

..... , this court considered the material on record and framed the following substantial question of law: whether the courts below have considered the mandate under section 20 of specific relief act, 1963 in the light of the evidence on record?. 5. the counsel appearing for the appellants during the course of his argument would vehemently ..... of cpc and 11 not exercised the discretion properly. the counsel also would vehemently contend that the first appellate court not properly appreciated the section 20 of specific relief act and only a formal discussion was made in the paragraph no.34 and not discussed the evidence available on record with regard to the exercising ..... would be giving a premium to the dishonest conduct on the part of the defendant/executant of the agreement to sell. even the discretion under section 20 of the act is required to be exercised judiciously, soundly and reasonably. the plaintiff cannot be punished by refusing the relief of specific performance despite the fact that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //