Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... clearly stated that there are inherent limitations in exercise of that power of judicial review. government is the guardian of the finances of the state. it is expected to protect the financial interest of the state. the right to refuse the lowest or ..... it.3. that the second sale was under the authority of the collector available to him under the first proviso to section 89(1) read with condition no.(4) of the permission dated 1.5.2003 granted to indigold to purchase the concerned ..... , jodhpur (for short 'the association') who have applied for allotment of shops pursuant to notification/ advertisement dated 13.12.2006 issued by the second respondent. the facts necessary and germane to the matter are that second respondent published an advertisement in ..... plots by the state government is not desirable if there is no material placed on record to show that government has not acted in furtherance of public interest. the supreme court in rajasthan housing board & anr. v. g.s.investments and anr., .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... clearly stated that there are inherent limitations in exercise of that power of judicial review. government is the guardian of the finances of the state. it is expected to protect the financial interest of the state. the right to refuse the lowest or ..... it.3. that the second sale was under the authority of the collector available to him under the first proviso to section 89(1) read with condition no.(4) of the permission dated 1.5.2003 granted to indigold to purchase the concerned ..... , jodhpur (for short 'the association') who have applied for allotment of shops pursuant to notification/ advertisement dated 13.12.2006 issued by the second respondent. the facts necessary and germane to the matter are that second respondent published an advertisement in ..... plots by the state government is not desirable if there is no material placed on record to show that government has not acted in furtherance of public interest. the supreme court in rajasthan housing board & anr. v. g.s.investments and anr., .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... benefit the state in achieving its social, political and economical goal. for every return there has to be investment. investment needs resources and finances. so even to protect this sacrosanct right finances are an inherent requirement. harnessing such resources needs top priority. [20].27. coming back to test the claim of the respondents, the ..... is an instrumentality of state within the meaning of article 12 of the constitution of india, is obliged to be public oriented and is not expected to act in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions, oppressively vis-a-vis a pensioner, who is passing through evening phase of his life. reminding accountability of the ..... university and the syndicate is authorized to determine the [7]. quantum of amount to be reimbursed, but while considering the request of an individual, syndicate cannot act in an absolutely arbitrary and whimsical manner to reject medical claim of the retired employee. mr. avinash acharya would urge that on the face of it, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... but the elaborate submissions made on behalf of learned counsel for the parties persuaded this court to decide a vital issue of privileged communication . within the meaning of section 126 of the act of 1872. section 126 refers to professional communications, which reads as under: 126. professional communica- tions.-no barrister, attorney, pleader or vakil shall at any time be permitted, unless ..... take premium of its serious lapses. learned counsel for the respondent has argued that the suit was filed in february 2000 and ex-parte decree was passed on 19th january 2006 and for setting aside the same the appellant has submitted application under order 9 rule 13 cpc after a lapse of three years without explaining the inordinate delay and therefore ..... [1].in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur judgment m/s.srei international finance limited versus ashok kumar s.b.civil misc. appeal no.1606/2013 date of judgment: november 28, 2014. present hon'ble mr.justice p.k.lohra, j. mr.s. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... examinations. in the peculiar circumstances of the case before such unending trial could get converted itself into a permanent menace, the answering respondents had to act and had acted to hold the credibility of the entire institution. the petitioner has provided for all the reasons and circumstances leading to the satisfaction of the answering ..... (2), to drop the enquiry and to dismiss the petitioner from service. the petitioner as an employee of the high court has committed serious misconduct. the act of misconduct, prima facie established, had scandalized the administration of justice in the state of rajasthan. the hon'ble judge, after a discreet enquiry conducted by ..... on your part was not proper and thus you transgressed all limits of decency, failed to maintain the dignity and respect towards the judiciary. this conduct and act of yours besides being unbecoming of an officer amounts to gross misconduct. statement of charge no.2 that you shri kalwani while posted & functioning as stated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... observed that same should be passed after taking into consideration the gravity and seriousness of the offence, holding a preliminary enquiry, if possible and such an administrative act should be free from arbitrariness. it should be bonafide and in public interest. para 32 of the said judgment reads thus:- the principles of law enunciated ..... hereinabove show that the every governmental action including purely administrative acts have to be free from arbitrariness. wherever, the order is made by a public authority affecting a member of public (he may be a government employee). ..... the employee, its gravity and seriousness, the record of 5 the government servant and the likely impact on service or the public interest of the alleged act of delinquency of the employee. the power of suspension cannot be exercised as a matter of course. no unfettered discretion is vested with the competent authority .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... hindus a woman at the time of her marriage take certain vows and those are :- my lord, you were kind to give me the responsibility of the home, food and finances. i promise that i shall discharge all my responsibilities for the welfare of the household, family and the children. this is my commitment to you. my lord, at all times ..... is my commitment and pledge to you. you are my joy and my devotion to you is pure. my lord, in all acts of righteousness (dharma), in material prosperity (artha), in every form of enjoyment, and in divine acts such as fire sacrifice, worship and charity, i promise to participate and will always be with you. i will please you in every .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... and the provision aforesaid nowhere mentions for rectification of 'apparent mistakes' only. the statute refers 'rectification of mistake' and the scope of sub-section (1) of section 64 of the act of 1932 is sufficient enough to infer that the registrar is having authority to conduct an inquiry too within the permissible limits for rectification of ..... . the legislature has given these two modes for rectification of the mistakes to the registrar for distinct purposes. the power given under sub-section(2) of section 64 of the act of 1932 can be invoked where all partners of the firm are at consensus about the mistake occurred in the document relating to the ..... questioning the entries dated 07.02.2005 and 13.10.2006 recorded in the register of firms.where there is bona fide dispute about the documents and interpretation of various laws requiring recording of evidence, the matter cannot be adjudicated under section 64 of the act which being a summary proceeding, wherein only rectification of any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... and the provision aforesaid nowhere mentions for rectification of 'apparent mistakes' only. the statute refers 'rectification of mistake' and the scope of sub-section (1) of section 64 of the act of 1932 is sufficient enough to infer that the registrar is having authority to conduct an inquiry too within the permissible limits for rectification of ..... . the legislature has given these two modes for rectification of the mistakes to the registrar for distinct purposes. the power given under sub-section(2) of section 64 of the act of 1932 can be invoked where all partners of the firm are at consensus about the mistake occurred in the document relating to the ..... questioning the entries dated 07.02.2005 and 13.10.2006 recorded in the register of firms.where there is bona fide dispute about the documents and interpretation of various laws requiring recording of evidence, the matter cannot be adjudicated under section 64 of the act which being a summary proceeding, wherein only rectification of any .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... mr. justice arun bhansali mr. j.k. chanda, for the appellant. mr. deelip kawadia, for respondent-claimants. ---- by the court: this appeal under section 30 of the workmen's compensation act, 1923 ('the act') is directed against judgment and award dated 29.06.1999 passed by the workmen's compensation commissioner, udaipur ('the commissioner'), whereby, a sum of rs.83 ..... submitted that the accident occurred on 23.11.1991, however, the commissioner has awarded interest @ 12% per annum, which is contrary to the provisions of section 4a(3)(a) of the act as it then existed. the said provision was amended w.e.f. 15.09.1995 and the amended provision providing for interest @ 12% per annum cannot ..... 1995 to the date of actual payment. it is noticed that the interim order was passed by this court on 29.09.1999, which was vacated on 08.05.2006. in that view of the matter, the appeal is partly allowed. the award impugned passed by the commissioner is modified to the extent that the claimants would be .....
Tag this Judgment!