Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2005 section 92 amendment of section 13 Court: rajasthan Page 100 of about 1,275 results (0.130 seconds)

Smt. Kaushliya Devi and ors. Vs. Assistant Director, Urban Lands and B ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)69

..... the first question for consideration in this case is whether the notice (anx. 7) has validly been issued to the petitioners by the respondent no. 1. section 15b of the act runs as under:15b. land and building tax escaping assessment--if the assessing authority has reason to believe, that for any reason any land or building has ..... (respondent no. 1) and appeals before the deputy director (respondent no. 2).2. it has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that section 15b of the act permits an assessing authority to re-assess building or land if he has reason to believe that for any reason the land or building has escaped assessment or ..... the assistant director, dated march 20, 1985 (anx. 5) refusing to refund the amount of tax deposited sarlier and his notice (anx. 7) issued under section 15-b of the act. the facts of the case giving rise to this petition may be summarised thus.: the petitioners own suresh bhawan, 803 chopasani road. jodhpur. the assistant director assessed .....

Bhagwat Singh, Himmat, Prahlad and Govind Ram and ors. Vs. State of Ra ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1991(1)WLN429

..... by the trial court. only, appellant, chhitariya has been sentenced to one year's r.i. under section 325, ipc, while releasing to her appellants, yadram & ram khileri, after admonition under section 3 of the probation of offenders act. therefore, i do not think that after a lapse of about thirteen years from the date of incident, ..... of sections case no. 52/81) convicted under section 323, ipc, but ordered to be released after admonition under section 3 of the probation of offenders act.4. remaining accused persons were convicted & sentenced as under:chhitaria under section 325, ipc, - one year's ri with afine of rs. 500/- ..... the incident of a free fight, convicted the accused persons who are appellants in these appeals for their individual act.3. each of the accused persons-himmat singh, prahlad & govind ram (appellants in cr. app. no. 245/83 out of sections case no. 51/81) and yadram & ram khilari (appellants in cr. app. no 240/83 out .....

Soma-bscpl, Jv Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1736

..... department of mines under the rajasthan minor mineral concession rules, 1956.according to the petitioner, the main controversy is that under the rajasthan vat act, 2003, vide section 77, it has been provided for establishment of check-posts on contract basis. the provision empowers the state government to award contract for collection ..... agreement is 30 months. the date of commencement of the work contract was 06.11.2005 ..... , rajasthan sales tax act, 1994 and rajasthan entry tax act, 1999, respectively.the petitioner was awarded contract by the nhai for construction of 4-way lane in the name of 'rehabilitation and upgradation of bakeria to gogunda section' of the national highway no. 76 and the period fixed under the said work contract .....

Mohan Ram Vs. Board of Revenue for Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1996(2)WLN247

..... of justice, the court may grant a temporary injunction and, if necessary, appoint a receiver.5. according to shri beniwal the ingredients enumerated under section 212 of the rajasthan tenancy act are not attracted in the present case. in support of his aforesaid argument he invited my attention towards a decision rendered by a division bench of ..... receiver in respect of the land in question.2. the aforesaid orders have been passed by the abovementioned courts in exercise of its power under section 212 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955. thus petitioner's claim opposing appointment of receiver has been negatived by all the courts below.3. learned counsel for the petitioner shri ..... and others (supra) is not applicable to the facts and circumstances of the present case.9. mandatory provisions contained under section 212 of the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 make it crystal clear that any act and omission of a party in suit which tends to defeat the ends of justice has to be arrested by the courts .....

Chandrabhan and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(1)Raj98

..... participatory role in a trial. they are not expected to the tape recorders to record whatever is being stated by the witnesses. section 311 of the code and section 615 of the evidence act confer vast and wide powers on presiding officers of court to elicit all necessary materials by playing an active role in the evidence ..... noticing that independent eyewitnesses at the temple of dayal das maharaj and the power house were deliberately left by the investigating officer, should have exercised power under section 311 cr.p.c.7. per contra learned counsel for the accused who were acquitted, supported the impugned finding of acquittal and urged that the deceased gopi ..... in the matter.14. considering the case zahira habibulla sheikh v. state of gujarat (supra), their lordships of the supreme court in satyajit banerjee v. state of bengal 2005 (1) rcr (criminal) 723, recorded note of caution thus:24. since strong reliance has been placed on the best bakery case (gujarat riots case-supra) it .....

SharafuddIn Vs. State of Rajasthan and Mst. Kaneej Fatima Alias Bala

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1987WLN(UC)654

..... followed. kanija fatima was arrested with two children, namely, sahina aged 7 years and ehatramuddin aged 3 years, in first information report no. 302/82 registered for the offence under section 380, ipc. when kanija fatima and mohammed tahir were released on bail, these two children were given in the custody of sharafuddin (petitioner) vide order dated 27-6-1983 which ..... is functus officio as the final report has been given then mother of the children should approach the competent civil court for their custody either under the guardianship and wards act or, the personal law, as advised.7. i am handicapped in considering this application because no one has appeared on behalf of the mother inspite of my best efforts to ..... guman mal lodha, j.1. sharafudin has filed this criminal misc. petition under section 482, cr. p.c. with the prayer that the orders dated 11-4-1983 and 16-6-1983 by which the bailable warrants were issued against him and he was .....

Dharmendra Parth Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2002(93)FLR403]; 2002(1)WLC609

..... . the case of vivek goswami (supra) was on the point that even a person who has already accepted the post of lower division clerk can still ask the government to act under rule 5 to give him appointment on the suitable post befitting his qualification.5. the case of sanjay choudhary v. state of rajasthan and ors. (2), was a case .....

Smt. Nidhi Dalela Vs. Deepak Dalela

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR2002Raj128; II(2002)DMC182; 2002(1)WLC737

..... only to cut short her marital life but also to force hereto lead a gloomy life with permanent social stigma of her character assassination. alternative plea under section 23 of the hindu marriage act 1955 was also averred by nidhi in the written statement.6. deepak filed his rejoinder on march 27, 1996. thereafter learned family court framed following two issues ..... . if per chance he did talk, he was beaten and manhandled by her. (iii) although nidhi in 1989-90 sought admission in m.a. (economic) p.g. diploma (finance) and evening classes of i.c.w.a. and used go from house daily for attending classes yet she did not take examinations nor did she offer a satisfactory reply ..... 20, 1987.4. on april 6, 1995 deepak filed a petition in the family court jaipur for the dissolution of his marriage with nidhi under section 13 of the hindu marriage act, 1955 (for short the act) on the ground of cruelty. it was averred in the petition thus, --(i) nidhi used to spend most of her time lonely in her .....

Rohitash Kumar and ors. Vs. Hindustan Copper Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(2)Raj1210

..... the payment is made by the respondents no. 1 and 2 to the trust in routine manner. the respondents no. 1 and 2 have no control over the budget and finance of respondent no. 3. there are no equivalent posts of accountants. sales men and delivery boys under respondents no. 1 and 2 with that of the trust. no posts ..... v. dipti paul : (2000)10scc413 .7. refuting the contentions, learned senior counsel for the appellants contended that the respondent no. 1 is a company registered under the companies act and solely owned by the government of india and the respondent no. 2 is a unit of respondent no. 1 and hence being a government company enterprise the respondents no ..... the income and expenditure of trust is controlled by the trustees and not by respondents no. 1 & 2. the trust is not registered under the public trust act or societies registration act and it is running fair price shop for the benefits of residents of khetri at large and the employees of khetri copper complex. it is not a part of .....

Shri Prahlad Gurjar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

..... to make available the information under section 8(h) of right to information act, 2005. when no action for prosecution was taken by the respondents against both the persons under section 12(1) and 12(2) of the passport act and no sanction was provided to him under section 15 of the passport act, then the petitioner filed this writ ..... reveals that they being public officials, have failed to proceed in accordance to law. further, the petitioner ought to have been given sanction under section 15 of the passport act to prosecute such persons but even the same has been refused. in other words, the respondents are neither launching prosecution against the guilty nor ..... taken against both the persons, the petitioner moved an application on 25.07.2008 (annexure-4) for grant of permission to launch prosecution under section 15 of the passport act. subsequently, in the month of september, 2008, the petitioner received a communication from the ministry of external affairs dated 11.09.2008 stating that .....