Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2005 section 2 income tax Court: allahabad Page 97 of about 19,855 results (0.137 seconds)

Hamdard (Wakf) Laboratories Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(188)ELT476(All)

..... till the date of refund of such duty:provided where any duty ordered to be refunded under sub-section (2) of section 11b in respect of an application under sub-section (1) of that section made before the date on which the finance bill, 1995 receives the assent of the president, is not refunded within three months from such date, ..... claim for refund was made on 25th august, 1999 whereas the order for refund has been passed on 16th november, 2000. under the provision of section 11bb of the act, interest start running after three months from the date of the application irrespective of the fact as to whether the order for refund has been made ..... the assistant commissioner of central excise, division-i, ghaziabad to also pay interest from 26th november, 1999 to 16th november, 2000 at the rate specified under section 11bb of the act.7. in view of the foregoing discussions, the writ petition succeeds and is allowed. the assistant commissioner of central excise, division-i, ghaziabad is directed to .....

Muir Mills Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court-i and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR640]

..... from the mill, and thereafter, the respondent-workmen had no concern with the establishment in question. however, thereafter application was moved under section 33-c(2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, claiming amount towards ex-gratia on the ground that wrong calculation had been done. said claim was registered and the said application ..... of large amount of money being pumped by the central government, production of the mill deteriorated by every passing year, and consequently, the central government stopped providing finance and production activity completely came to a halt with effect from 1.4.1991. national textile corporation, u.p. ltd. has 11 units including the petitioner ..... woolen mills ltd. v. mahendra partapria buch 1980 (41) flr 153 (sc), and judgment in the case of nizam sugars ltd. v. chelikan; sri ranganyakallu : 2005 (104) flr 221. both the judgments cited on behalf of petitioners, will not come to the rescue of petitioners. in the case of sri digvijai woolen mills ltd. .....

The U.P. Stock Exchange Association Ltd. Vs. Vegepro Foods and Feeds L ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2006]131CompCas385(All)

..... 3. it is contended by sri r.p. agarwal, learned counsel for the respondents, that in view of the registration of reference under section 15(1) of the act of 1985, the provisions of section 22(1) of the act will come into play, and that the proceedings of winding up did not lie and are liable to be dismissed, until the proceedings ..... act. it is also the legislative intention to see that no proceedings against the assets are taken before any such decision is given by the bifr, or in case the company's assets are sold, or the company is wound up, it may indeed become difficult later to restore the status qua ante. the view of this court in industrial finance ..... hp) were thus approved. he further submits that the winding up commences on the date when the winding up petition is filed, and as such, under section 22(1), the bar created by the act of 1985 will operate even to the proceedings which have not been filed. in such cases, where the proceedings are pending before the bifr, the company .....

Ganesh Bartan Bhandar and anr. Vs. Income-tax Settlement Commission an ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2006)203CTR(All)594; [2005]276ITR544(All)

..... in the case of cit v. express newspapers ltd. : [1994]206itr443(sc) which is misplaced as it related to sub-section (1a) of section 245d of the act, which has since been omitted by the finance (no. 2) act of 1991 with effect from september 27, 1991. he, thus, submitted that the order passed by the settlement commission, which has ..... tribunal, which is still pending. it has been further stated by the petitioners that the application dated april 9, 1992, filed by the petitioners under section 245c of the act has been decided ex parte vide order dated september 27, 1994, which was the subject-matter of challenge before this court in civil miscellaneous writ petition no ..... therewith, the petitioners filed a return on february 19, 1991, declaring net taxable income at rs. 18,250. after filing the aforesaid return, a notice under section 142(1) of the act was issued on january 11, 1993. another notice was issued on january 25, 1993, and march 17, 1993, calling upon the petitioner firm to furnish .....

HafizuddIn Adult Son of Sri MajeeduddIn Vs. Additional District Judge ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2006(109)FLR877]; (2006)IIILLJ276All

..... placed upon para 9 of the said judgment. the same is being reproduced below:9. an important departure is made in section 29 sub-section (2) of the, limitation act of 1963. under the indian limitation act, 1908 section 29(2)(b) provided that for the purpose of determining any period of limitation prescribed for any suit, appeal or application ..... that in a case where an application for special leave to appeal from an order of acquittal is filed after the coming into force of the limitation act, 1963, section 5 would be available to the applicant and if he can show that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the application within the time limit of ..... in jokkim fernandez v. amna kunhi umma : air1974ker162 (supra), the majority did not agree on account of its wrong supposition that appellate authority functioning under section 18 of the rent act is a personadesignata. once the presumption is found to be erroneous as discussed by us earlier, it becomes at once clear that minority view in the .....

In Re: DanIn Leathers (P.) Ltd. (In Liquidation)

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2008]83SCL123(All)

..... the year ended on 31-3-1994, retirement benefits of gratuity, etc., is accounted for on 'cash basis' which is against the provisions of section 20g of the companies act, 1956, and also of the guidance note issued by the institute of chartered accountants of india on this subject. however, the auditor of the company ..... company.(f)(i) lead managers to the issue were: prudential capital markets ltd., 'ameen complex' 9, rani laxmi bai marg, lucknow-226 001.(ii) the industrial finance corporation of india ltd., merchant banking and allied business department, first floor, core v, scope complex, 7, lodhi road, new delhi-110 003.(g) advisors to ..... ultimately after several summons, warrants and then non-bailable warrants issued for securing their presence they appeared and sought adjournments in the proceedings up to 14-11-2005. initially, they made several unusual requests like providing requisite forms for filing statement of affairs. their counsel shri l.k. pandey pleaded ignorance of company law .....

Smt. Shakti Kumari Gupta Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1525

..... 1975]2scr674 , the supreme court observed that where a government activity involves public element, the 'citizen has a right to claim equal treatment', and when 'the state acts to the prejudice of a person, it has to be supported by legality.' functioning of a 'democratic form of government demands equality and absence of arbitrariness and discrimination.25 ..... was brought from the jail as he had been detained there being an accused in a case under section 302, i.p.c. his counsel mr. srivastava sought time to file reply, which was granted till 24.11.2005. however, no reply was filed by him. the last opportunity was given to mr. sanjay srivastava ..... state of u. p. and ors. : air1991sc537 and ghaziabad development authority v. delhi auto and general finance pvt. ltd. and ors. : [1994]3scr248 ).27. the rule of law prohibits arbitrary action and command the authority concerned to act in accordance with law. every action of the state or its instrumentalities should not only be fair, legitimate and .....

Vijay Kumar JaIn Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2006)205CTR(All)546

..... petitioner filed the return on 29th april, 2004. the petitioner has further alleged that opposite party no. 3 again issued notice on 5th jan., 2005 under section 142 of the act requiring the petitioner to appear on 17th jan., 2005. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that reasons for reopening the assessment proceedings were not intimated to the petitioner in spite of the ..... end of the asst. yr. 1997-98. he further submits that as no reason has been assigned in the notice under section 148 of the it act, the notice deserves to be quashed. he has relied upon the decisions in peerless general finance & investment co. ltd. v. dy. cit , man mohan singh v. asstt. cit : [1993]203itr74(all) and sohan lal singhania v. ito .....

Nayak Industries Ltd. Vs. Chairman Bank of Baroda and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... to take appropriate decision in the matter preferably within three weeks. the respondent bank, without complying with the said order, issued notice on 31.3.2010 under section 13 of the sarfesi act and therefore, frustrating the very purpose of the writ petition no. 10347 of 2010. the respondent bank vide letter dated 6.4.2010 replied to the ..... the question of deciding the matter on merit by the respondent bank did not arise as the petitioner had not filed formal objections to the notice under section 13 (2) of the act. the allegation is that the respondent bank instead of complying with the direction of this court given on 26.2.2010 delegated the task to its ..... 26.10.2009 (annexure no. 32) issued by head office/respondent no.2; iv.to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the finance ministry of union of india/respondent no.6 to constitute a high power committee to look into the various anomalies committed (and still being committed) by the respondent bank of .....

The British India Corp. Ltd.Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... show that any of the statutory authorities are running the industry. 17. let us now consider the alternative argument. 18. the notification under section 39 of the industrial disputes act issued by the central government empowering the state authorities to refer the dispute even in the case of central government company, would not be ..... july, 1996 when the said notification was not in existence. secondly, under the notification, the state authorities could refer an industrial dispute under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, 1947 to the labour court or tribunal constituted by the central government, which is not the case in the present facts. a learned single ..... it was catering to the vital needs of the general public, it was thought prudent by the central government to pump in more finances and therefore the parliament enacted the act. by the said act, it acquired all the shares in private hands and vested it in the central government. accordingly, even the directors etc. were .....