Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1994 chapter 8 miscellaneous Court: karnataka Year: 2012 Page 5 of about 51 results (0.079 seconds)

Gouli Mahadevappa Vs. Income-tax Officer and Another

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... correct to hold that the operation of legal fiction under section 50c of the act has to be restricted only for the purpose of section 48 of the act as wrongly interpreted by the income tax tribunal and not to be applied for the entire chapter vi e relating to taxation of capital gains, especially to section 45 of ..... the income tax act? (d) whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case, the income tax tribunal is correct in law in rejecting the contention that the ..... and the revenue, the following substantial questions of law would arise for consideration in this appeal: 1. whether the registration value fixed by the state authorities under stamp act would constitute full consideration value for the purpose of levy of long-term capital gains? 2. whether the assessee is entitled to contend that the sale consideration shown .....

A. N. Ramalingegowda and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka by Its Secr ...

Court : Karnataka

..... on the representation of the third respondent, in our considered opinion, cannot be supported by the kind of powers the state government can exercise under chapter ix sections 94 to 102 of the act. 44. in fact, the government is given a type of supervisory or over-riding power and the power can be exercised to put the ..... requirement of public auction sale and extending of concession and therefore the matter was not only referred to the opinion of the law department but also of the finance department and after obtaining such opinions, the matter had also been placed before the cabinet for its approval and the approval of the cabinet was without concession of ..... by the civic body after the note is processed by the two standing committees viz., standing committee for town planning and development and standing committee for taxation and finance etc. 15. this note was placed before the standing committee for town planning and development and elicited its approval on 21-10-2005 [annexure-g to wp .....

The Jamia Masjid Vs. K.V. Rudrappa and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... compromise having been found to be vitiated by fraud, misrepresentation, misunderstanding or mistake, the decree passed thereon has the binding force of 'res judicata'. 2. (1994) 2 scc 14, sulochana amma versus narayanannair. the law commission in its report recommended to remove the anomaly and bring within its fold the conclusiveness of an issue ..... the claim and as such the present suit is barred by resjudicata. mr. prasanna kumar has contended that waiver, relinquishment, abandonment or withdrawal or all acts of the parties which can be explained only after full fledged trial and in support of this proposition, he has relied upon the judgment of the honourable ..... has to be framed, adjudicated and answered independently and there cannot be overlapping of these two provisions. he would contend abandonment, relinquishment or withdrawal are all acts of the parties which can be explained during trial and only after a full fledged trial a decision can be arrived at and not otherwise. he .....

Maheboobsab Buransab Maniyar and Others Vs. Mohadinsab Maheboobsab Man ...

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

..... the parties, it is necessary to have a glimpse of right of pre-emption of a muslim under mahomedan law. 17. in the principles of mahomedan law by mulla, 19thedition, chapter 13 deals with pre-emption. section 226 which deals with pre-emption reads as under: pre-emption: the right of shufaa or pre-emption is a right which the owner ..... supreme court of india had an occasion to deal with the right of pre-emption among muslims in the case of smt. mattoo devi vs. damodarlal (d) (appeal (civil) 5816/1994, decided on 18th july, 2001), it is held under: the principle of talab in mohammadan law has three specific facets: the first being talab-e-muwthaba; talab in common parlance .....

Vokkaligara Sangha, by Its General Secretary, Dr. K. Mahadev Vs. the B ...

Court : Karnataka

..... of the act relate to property and finance of the bda. s.38 is with regard to the power of the bda to lease, sell or transfer the ..... property. s.38-a relates to grant of area reserved for civic amenities etc. s.69 of the act is with regard to the power of government ..... the act was enacted to provide for the establishment of a development authority for the development of the city of bangalore and areas adjacent thereto and for matters connected therewith. indisputedly, bda has a number of public duties and functions to perform. ss.15 to 34 in chapter iii of the act relate to the development schemes. ss.37 to 48 in chapter v .....

Coastal Mines and Minerals, a Partnership Firms and Others Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... this court quashed the criminal proceedings on the sole ground of delay. in a case fir filed in 1954 for violation of the provisions of the customs act and foreign exchange regulation act was challenged in the allahabad high court. it was deliberately kept pending in the high court and in this court till 1990. the accusation was violation ..... or in association with others by petitioner no.2, requires the same to be salvaged. for the otherwise, the illegal gains obtained by petitioner no.2 by his acts of fraud, would be irretrievably secreted. incidentally, petitioner no.2 is said to have approached the apex court seeking transfer of the case to a court in the state ..... coal limited vs. jharia talkies and cold storage (p) limited, 1997 cwn 122; s.s.jain and company vs. union of india, (1994)1 chn 445, and new horizons limited vs. union of india, air 1994 del.126.), it is more appropriate for the petitioners to invoke the jurisdiction of such other high court, which would be competent to address .....

Maheboobsab Buransab Maniyar and Others Vs. Mohadinsab Maheboobsab Man ...

Court : Karnataka Gulbarga

..... the parties, it is necessary to have a glimpse of right of pre-emption of a muslim under mahomedan law. 17. in the principles of mahomedan law by mulla, 19thedition, chapter 13 deals with pre-emption. section 226 which deals with pre-emption reads as under: pre-emption: the right of shufaa or pre-emption is a right which the owner ..... supreme court of india had an occasion to deal with the right of pre-emption among muslims in the case of smt. mattoo devi vs. damodarlal (d) (appeal (civil) 5816/1994, decided on 18th july, 2001), it is held under: the principle of talab in mohammadan law has three specific facets: the first being talab-e-muwthaba; talab in common parlance .....

H.S.Shamanna and ors. Vs. Smt. Lakshmi and ors.

Court : Karnataka

..... , against the defendant?6. whether the valuation of the suit is made properly and court fee paid thereon is sufficient?7. whether the suit of the plaintiff being tampered case financed by the first plaintiff is not maintainable?8. whether the suit is bad for misjoinder of parties?9. whether plaintiffs are entitled to the relief of declaration, possession and mandatory ..... and since these sites could not stand reduced in size, unless there was encroachment by the first defendant and the third defendant, the court below was clearly overlooking the blatant acts of encroachment by the first defendant who has constructed over the land of the plaintiffs, making up for the reduction of her property by the widening of the road, towards .....

M/S. Hegde Motor Transport Vs. the Assistant Provident

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2012(5)KLJ11

..... is whether subsequent unit viz., m/s. mody sales and service could survive on closure of m/s. devesh sandeep associates and whether in matters of finance and employment, the employer has actually kept the two units distinct or integrated. mere fact of common ownership of the two units and mere location of ..... between different units, it cannot be held there is interdependency particularly in the back drop of these three individual persons being assessed under the income tax act, 1961 separately and independently. he would also submit that the test that ought to have been applied by the authority was to ascertain as to whether ..... . 3. petitioner is carrying on transport business by employing workers and said establishment was not covered under the employees provident fund and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to act for the sake of brevity). on 9.3.2006 squad of enforcement officer headed by regional provident fund commissioner, regional office, mangalore, inspected the .....

Syndicate Bank, Manipal Vs. S.R. Padiyar and Another

Court : Karnataka

..... the account holders namely m/s.acrobond exports, m/s.hitesh exports, m/s.nahalchand laloochand, m/s.nucleus securities ltd., and m/s. wall street finance limited, committed offences under the customs act, 1962, and the officials of the bank abetted the same. the bank appointed one sri.n.r.kamath, an officer working in vigilance unit of the bank ..... .02.1995 to 21.02.1995 on the introduction of some customers of malabar hills and nariman point branches; and 30 current accounts opened during the period between 09.05.1994 and 03.02.1995 on the introduction of customers of local branches of the 1st respondent - bank. petitioner gave a reply on 08.09.1995 stating that he was ..... not in dispute between the parties that the enquiry was not based on the said inspection report or the concurrent audit report or the regular inspection report for the year 1994-95. no persons were examined by the authors of the report before preparing the said report. in fact, the said report was prepared by one sri n.r. .....