Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on : Dec-21-2023
..... 9395 wp no.202928 of 2023 c/w wp no.203032 of 2023 9.1 as per rule 3 of the rules, 1977, 'law officer' means- "in this chapter, chapter iii and chapter viii "law officer" means an advocate on record, "associate advocate" a government advocate, the state prosecutor, a high court government pleader, a district government pleader a public ..... counsels for the high court, this court, however, in state of u.p. and ors. etc. v. u.p. state law officers association and ors. etc. (1994)1 scr348while distinguishing shrilekha vidyarthi (supra), observed that legal profession is essentially a service oriented profession. noticing the changing scenario as also growth of litigation, this court emphasized the obligation ..... c/w wp no.203032 of 2023 (5) a law officer shall be liable to be removed from office at any time if he is guilty of any act or conduct which, in the opinion of the government is contrary to these rules or is incompatible with his duties as such law officer. decision of the government .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on : Dec-21-2023
..... 9395 wp no.202928 of 2023 c/w wp no.203032 of 2023 9.1 as per rule 3 of the rules, 1977, 'law officer' means- "in this chapter, chapter iii and chapter viii "law officer" means an advocate on record, "associate advocate" a government advocate, the state prosecutor, a high court government pleader, a district government pleader a public ..... counsels for the high court, this court, however, in state of u.p. and ors. etc. v. u.p. state law officers association and ors. etc. (1994)1 scr348while distinguishing shrilekha vidyarthi (supra), observed that legal profession is essentially a service oriented profession. noticing the changing scenario as also growth of litigation, this court emphasized the obligation ..... c/w wp no.203032 of 2023 (5) a law officer shall be liable to be removed from office at any time if he is guilty of any act or conduct which, in the opinion of the government is contrary to these rules or is incompatible with his duties as such law officer. decision of the government .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on : Apr-06-2023
..... ) 2. sachin kumar singhraha vs. state of madhya pradesh (crl.appeal 473-474 of 2019) reported in 2019 cr.r470 (sc)) 1 (1994) scc (crl.) 176 - 56 - nc:2023. khc-k:3808 crl.a no.200069 of 2020 c/w crl.rc.no.200001 of 2020 ..... or legal error in the judgment of conviction passed by the trial court.74. in the judgment of the apex court reported in 1994 scc (crl.) 176 in the case of deonandan mishra vs. state of bihar, the hon ble apex court observed with regard ..... accused for the offences punishable under sec.366(a), 376(2)(i) 302, 201 of ipc and u/sec. 6 if pocso act,2012. this criminal appeal having been heard and reserved for judgment on1603.2023, pronounced judgment on64.2023 confirming the judgment dated1303.2020 of ..... body. in that chapter, there is a separate heading for `sexual offence', which encompasses sections 375, 376, 376a, 376b, 376c and 376d. `rape' is defined under section 375 of ipc. sections 375 and 376 have been substantially changed by criminal law amendment act, 1983 and several .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on : Dec-05-2023
..... the respondent-buda, the option for acquisition that was available for the respondent-buda was by having recourse to the provision of chapter iv of the kuda act. in that section 35 provides for authority - 20 - nc:2023. khc-k:9018 mfa no.201826 of 2017 to acquire ..... at this juncture to refer to the relevant provisions of the said rules, 1991. aforesaid rules 1991 have been implemented on and from 29.01.1994. rule 3 of the said rules 1991 reads as under: 3. u aap. - p lp u g p g u ( u a ..... contentions urged by the learned counsel for the parties, it is necessary at this juncture to refer to certain provisions of la act, 1894, kuda act, 1987 and cpc to the extent applicable to the facts of the case. since admittedly subject lands are sought to be ..... it entered into in a manner known to law. he refers to section 35 and 36 of the karnataka urban development authorities act, 1984('kuda act' for short) and submits that if the respondent-buda wanted to acquire the land, it could have acquired the land .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on : May-25-2023
..... of 2010 9.1. the karnataka educational institutions (collegiate education) rules 2003 came into force on 7.8.2003 on being published in the karnataka gazette. chapter vii of these rules relates to terms and conditions of service of employees in private aided educational institutions, discipline etc., thus these rules of the year 2003 ..... case.2. the petitioner was working as a principal of smt.giraja mahila pre-university college, sindhanur, run by the respondent-society from the year 1994. disciplinary enquiry was initiated against the petitioner on the basis of ten charges relating to misappropriation of monies, highhandedness etc. under rule 17 of the ..... determination are: - 8 - wp no.84740 of 2010 1. whether the rules of 1978 would stand repealed on coming into force of the karnataka education act, 1983?.2. whether the rules of 1978 would stand superseded by the karnataka educational institutions (collegiate education) rules 2003?.3. whether the disciplinary proceedings initiated .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi
Decided on : Jul-14-2023
..... concerning section 12(b), it is observed as below: reference to manusmrithi would also be apposite here. even if verse 142 of chapter 9 of manusmrithi (which is mentioned in 491 in part i of this book) is examined, the translated version reads as follows ..... 03.2023 in the case of ashutosh bala dasi by lr's & others v/s smt ranjan bala dasi & others; .4. air 1994 bombay 235 in the case of nemichand shantilal patni v/s basantabai; 5. air2009(noc) 2727 (p & h) in the case of ..... years, the adoption was without his consent and was prohibited under the provisions of sec.10 of hindu adoptions and maintenance act, 1956 ( 'the act' for brevity).4. the defendant nos.1, 5 to 7 resisted the said suit contending that the plaintiff was given ..... by the plaintiff?.2. whether the learned trial court committed error in interpreting section 12 of the hindu adoptions and maintenance, act, 1956?.3. what order?.10. being aggrieved by the concurrent findings of both the courts, the plaintiff has approached this court .....
Tag this Judgment!