Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1983 section 33 omission of section 89a Page 1 of about 2 results (0.042 seconds)

Ags Entertainment Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

..... 28040 of 2011 is filed under article 226 of constitution of india praying to issue a writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under article 226 of the constitution of india, declaring that the provisions of section 65(105)(zzzzt) of the finance act, 1994 is beyond the legislative competence of the union of india under article 248 of the constitution of india, and void being repugnant to article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india and accordingly unenforceable. ..... of 2013 is filed under article 226 of constitution of india praying to issue a writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under article 226 of the constitution of india, declaring that the provisions of section 65(105)(zzzzt) of the finance act, 1994 is beyond the legislative competence of the union of india under article 248 of the constitution of india, and void being repugnant to articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india and accordingly unenforceable. ..... of 2013 is filed under article 226 of constitution of india praying to issue a writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under article 226 of the constitution of india, declaring that the provisions of section 65(105)(zzzzt) of the finance act, 1994 is beyond the legislative competence of the union of india under article 248 of the constitution of india, and void being repugnant to article 14 and 19(1)(g) of the constitution of india and accordingly unenforceable. .....

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

..... 33 w.p.nos.14887, 19322, 20982 and 24804 of 2010 are filed seeking a writ of prohibition prohibiting the respondents from (a) giving effect to the provisions of section 65(90a) read with section 65(105)(zzzz) of the finance act, 1994 as amended by the finance act, 2007 and finance act, 2010 (b) levying or attempting to levy, collect or recover from the petitioner, any service tax under the said provisions and (c) levying or attempting to levy, collect or recover from the land owners of the petitioner, any service ..... 32 w.p.nos.24586 and 24588 of 2010 are filed seeking to declare that (i) the impugned provisions, i.e.section 65(105)(zzzz) read with section 65(90-a) of the finance act, 1994, as amended by the finance act, 2010, as null and void and ultra vires and violative of entry 49, list-ii, seventh schedule, articles 14, 19 and 246(3) of the constitution of india, (ii) section 76(a)(6)(h) and section 77 of the finance act, 2010 as null and void and ultra vires the constitution of india insofar as the petitioners are concerned; and (iii) the ..... (t.n.kalyana mandapam case, for brevity) and air2007sc2990 all india federation of tax practitioners versus union of india (all india federation of tax practitioners case, for brevity).14 in t.n.kalyana mandapam case, challenge was made to sub-section (i) of section 67 of the finance act, 1994, in and by which, service tax was levied in relation to service provided by a mandap-keeper to his client and also other consequential proceedings. .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kerala Vs. K. Srinivasan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1972SC491; [1972]83ITR346(SC); (1972)4SCC526; [1972]2SCR309

..... on a reference being sought the following question of law was referred to the high court :-whether the words 'income tax' in the finance act of 1964 in sub-section (2)(a) and sub-section (2)(b) of section 2 would include surcharge and additional surchargethe high court answered the question in the negative and m favour of the assessee.3. ..... although under the act section 4 is the charging section income tax can be charged only where the central act which, in the present case, will be the finance act enacts that income shall be charged for any assessment year at the rate or rates specified therein. ..... section 2 of the finance act 1971 is to the effect that the provisions of section 2 and of the first schedule to the finance act 1970 shall apply in relation to income tax for the assessment year or as the case may be the financial year commencing on the first day of april 1971 as they apply in relation to income tax for the assessment year commencing on first day of april 1970 with certain modifications set out in the section. ..... section 3(1) of that act read :subject to the provisions of this section the rates of income tax and rates of super tax...imposed by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the indian finance act 1940 shall, in respect of the year beginning on the first day of april 1940 be increased by a surcharge for the purpose of the central government....similar phraseology was employed in respect of surcharge on super tax. .....

Kanoria Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(190)ELT295(Kar)

..... been deprived of modvat credit to which the petitioners are otherwise entitled to in terms of the rules governing allowing of modvat credit, only because of the provisions of section 112 of the finance act, 2000, the petitioners are entitled to question the legality of this provision and further submits that even the supreme court while disposing of the review petition in the case ..... provisions of law or rule and therefore there was no occasion at all for the parliament to have enacted a validating levy and if there was no occasion, the very provisions of section 112 of the finance act, 2000 cannot be sustained inasmuch as it is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that there was no cause of action for the parliament to make such a law, ..... on the part of any person shall be punishable as an offence which would not have been so punishable if this section had not come into force.14. ..... finance act, 2000 receives the assent of the president and in the event of non-payment of such credit of duty within this period, in addition to the amount of credit of such duty recoverable, interest at the rate of twenty-four percent per annum shall be payable from the date immediately after the expiry of the said period of thirty days till the date of payment.explanation : for the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that no act or omission .....

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

..... the exclusion of stock in trade from the ambit of levy of wealth-tax on assets of closely held companies in section 40(3) of the finance act, 1983 could not per se be regarded as an "obvious omission" nor is giving it immunity from the levy of wealth-tax necessary for reasonably interpreting the unamended provision. ..... examining the retrospective or otherwise nature of amendment of section 40 of finance act, 1983 by finance act, 1988, for purposes of wealth tax act, the hon'ble madras high court held- the test to be applied for deciding as to whether a later amendment should be given retrospective effect, despite a legislative declaration specifying a prospective date as the date from which the ..... the amendment effected to section 40 of the finance act, 1983, by the finance act, 1988, exempting stock-in-trade is only prospective and not retrospective.gujarat ambuja cements ltd. ..... principle of law is that the law to be applied is that which is in force in the assessment year, unless otherwise provided expressly or by necessary intendment.12.34 a reading of the note to clauses or the amendment to section 113 in the finance act, 2002, extracted above, does not give any indication that the legislation was introduced to explain an earlier finance act or clarify the real intention of the legislature or that the proviso was inserted to supply an obvious omission or to clear up doubts as to the levy of surcharge in question. .....

Karvy Consultants Limited Vs. Government of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006[]STR75

..... after strictly construing section 65(19) of the finance act, 2003, that the functions of the registrar and share transfer agent is a service rendered which is in the nature of incidental or auxiliary support service rendered in the contract of sale of goods (securities ..... , during the relevant period, as share transfer agent, is in the nature of incidental or auxiliary support service in the sale of goods (securities) belonging to the client and falls within the purview of section 65(19)(iv) of the finance act, 2003, that the impugned show cause notice merely demanded service tax on service charges collected by the petitioner towards such services rendered from 1-7-2003 to 31-1-2004, that the show cause notice was issued ..... purposes of this clause, 'information technology service' means any service in relation to designing, developing or maintaining of computer software, or computerized data processing or system networking, or any other service primarily in relation to operation of computer systems.section 65(19), as amended by finance act, 2004 with effect from 10-9-2004, reads thus :-business auxiliary service' means any service in relation to :-(i) promotion or marketing or sale of goods produced or provided by or belonging to the client; or(ii) promotion or marketing of service .....

State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in the result, these petitions are allowed and it is hereby declared that section 65(25a), section 65(105) (zzze) and section 66 of the finance (no.2) act, 1994 as incorporated/ amended by the finance 60 act, 2005 to the extent that the said provisions purport to levy service tax in respect of services purportedly provided by the petitioner club to its members, to be ultra vires. ..... . the explanation to section 65, which was inserted by the finance act of 2006, reads as follows: explanation: for the purposes of this section, taxable service includes any taxable service provided or to be provided by any unincorporated association or body of persons to a member thereof, for cash, deferred payment or any other valuable consideration: 79 ..... been liable immediately before the appointed day to pay tax under section 4 or section 8 of the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941 (bengal act vi of 1941), and who 17 (ii) would have continued to be so liable on such appointed day under that act had this act not come into force, or whose gross turnover during a year first exceeds the taxable quantum as applicable to him under the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941, on the day immediately preceding the appointed day, (b)every ..... under section 64(3), chapter v of the finance act applied to taxable services as defined, with effect from 16th june, 2005. .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. L.G. Balakrishnan

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2002]255ITR339(Mad)

..... in the respective assessments in the absence of particulars furnished by the assessee 2. whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and having regard to the provisions of rule 9(5) of part iv of the first schedule to the finance act, 1979, the appellate tribunal was right in holding that there was neither an obligation on the assessee to return the net agricultural loss for the earlier years in the assessment of those years nor a duty ..... assessee is not to be denied the benefit of set off provided for in rule 9 of part iv of the first schedule to the finance act, 1979, as long as the assessee is able to show that he had incurred loss from his agricultural activities in the earlier assessment years after a computation made in accordance with the requirements of the rules provided in the relevant finance acts and that such loss had not been set off against the agricultural income of earlier years ..... . if the assessee is able to show that the result of the computation by applying the rules set out in the finance acts of 1974 and subsequent years prior to 1979, is a loss, the assessee is not to be denied the benefit of having that loss set off against the agricultural income of the previous year relevant to the assessment ..... despite the absence of provisions similar to sections 80 and 139(3) with regard to the need for having the loss determined in the relevant assessment year before claiming the right of carry forward of the loss to subsequent assessment years, the revenue .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shri Rangnath Bangur and Shri Purshotta ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1984)41CTR(Raj)21; [1984]149ITR487(Raj)

..... even without the proviso, the rate prescribed by the finance act of the previous year would have been applicable to the dividend income by virtue of the provisions of section 2(3)(a) of the relevant finance act; but the very same provisions have been added to para, 6a, in the form of a proviso and the same would make no difference to the interpretation of the main enacting part ..... the proviso, as mentioned above, merely makes the provisions of section 2(3)(a) of the finance act applicable in the calculation of rebate or concession relating to dividend income or ..... give the reasons for the answers as contained in our orders dated december 19, 1983, and which are reproduced below :'our answer to the first question referred to this court is that the assesses is entitled to the benefit of concision or rebate under para, 6a of the part b states (taxation concessions) order, 1950, in the course of reassessments under section 34 of the indian income-tax act, 1922, in respect of the whole of the dividend income, including the actual ..... reddi's case [1983] 144 itr 62 the earlier decision in standard motor products of india's case : [1983]142itr877(mad) was ..... reddi [1983] 144 ..... 's case : [1983]142itr877(mad) their lordships of the madras high court observed ..... : [1983]142itr877(mad) and ..... court by the income-tax appellate tribunal, delhi bench 'b', we heard the consolidated reference cases together and set out our answers to the questions referred to this court, in our orders dated december 19, 1983. .....

Yfc Projects P.Ltd. Vs. Uoi

Court : Delhi

..... circular no.98/1/2008-st, dated 04.01.2008 (at annexure p-4) issued by the respondent as illegal and unconstitutional by declaring that works contract of the petitioner were not subject to tax prior to the enactment of the finance act, 2007 as levied on works contract services under section 65(105)(zzzza) of chapter v of the finance act, 1994; b) issue a writ of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction against the respondent declaring that the production and supply of ready-mix concrete (rmc), which ..... or any other appropriate writ/order/direction against the respondent declaring that the works contract started prior to 01.06.2007 are also eligible to pay the tax under the works contract services under section 65 (105) (zzzza) of the finance act, 1994 read with rules made thereunder by notification no.32/2007-st, dated 22.05.2007; d) issue such other writ/order/direction against the respondent for refund of the service tax illegally collected from the ..... ) read with section 65(29) and section 65(39a), section 65(105)(zzq) read with section 65 (25b), section 65(105)(zzzh) read with section 65(30a) and section 65(91a) of chapter v of the finance act, 1994 as much as levying the service tax on the works contract and ready-mix concrete (rmc) as unconstitutional and also quashing of clarification given through instruction no.c.no.iv/16/56/07/stc dated 7-11-2007 (at annexure p-3) and under reference code no. .....