Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1978 section 39 amendment of act 6 of 1898 Court: madhya pradesh Page 36 of about 373 results (0.137 seconds)

Smt. Mamta Singh Vs. the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)MPLJ41

..... of the agreement, though no limitation is provided for the appointment of an arbitrator, but a period of 30 days has been prescribed, under sub-section (5) of section 11 of the act. the respondents were under obligation to appoint an arbitrator within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of request of the applicant. now ..... this court on notice, respondents caused appearance. the respondents raised a preliminary objection in the reply that on 20-10-2005, respondents appointed shri s.v. narasimhan, director (finance) of ioc, as sole arbitrator and this application may be dismissed. in support of the aforesaid contention, the respondents have filed document, i.e., copy of letter dated ..... placed reliance on the law laid down by this court in the case of data switchgears ltd. v. tata finance ltd. (2000) 8 scc p. 158, para 19, wherein this court has held as under:so far as section 11(6) is concerned, if one party demands the opposite party to appoint an arbitrator and the opposite party .....

Progressive Career Academy Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Fiitjee Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT432; 2006(1)MPLJ347

..... of this agreement. no other court shall have jurisdiction in such matters.it would also be appropriate to extract definition of court as provided in section 2, the act and the relevant provisions of section 11 of the act.2. definition.- (1) in this part, unless the context otherwise requires,-*** *** *** ****** *** *** ***(e) 'court' means the principal civil court ..... other courts or any other district of the country. the application was filed praying the chief justice of allahabad high court to appoint arbitrator under section 11(6) of the act. the said application was allowed by the allahabad high court. when the order of appointment was assailed in the writ petition, the writ ..... application by the applicants, this objection has no merit in view of the judgment passed by the supreme court in case of datar switchgears ltd. v. tata finance ltd. and anr. : (2000)8scc151 .6. the contention of the applicants that the agreement entered into between the parties was not signed by the applicants .....

Yusufkhan Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2003(1)MPHT42

..... /2000, 12/2001, 12/2000, 23/2000, 24/2000, 21/2000 and 22/2000 respectively framing charges against the petitioner under section 13(1)(c)(d) and section 13(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (for brevity 'the act') read with section 120, ipc.3. the prosecution case lie in a narrow compass that the applicants are teachers and were posted in the .....

Sheela Yadav Vs. Muthoot Finance and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... that out of her own funds, she had invested 3,00,000/- to purchase of debenture certificate in the name of her mother, as required under section 102 of the indian evidence act and consequently held that the debenture certificate no. 0532/427 does not belong to plaintiff. applying the principles of concept of preponderance of probabilities, the trial ..... burden of proof as regards availability of funds in her account, source thereof and its investment by her in the name of her mother-defendant no. 2 with muthoot finance-defendant no. 1 lied upon her. in para 15 of the impugned judgment it has been found that in para 11 of her cross-examination in the application filed ..... 1 and permanent injunction restraining defendants not to interfere in release of the amount in her favour. 4. there is no dispute amongst the parties that defendant no. 1-finance company had issued a debenture certificate no. 0532/427 dated 10/12/2010 in the name of defendant no. 2-smt. basso bai. 5. it is averred in the .....

Kamleshkumar Chhabra Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1985MP130; 1985MPLJ72

..... secretary to the government. under the rules, which have the force of the law, the respondent no. 2 is authorised to register a person as a manufacturer under section 11 of the act. by an administrative order the respondent no. 2 cannot be divested of the said statutory power. in the circumstances the respondent no. 2 being the authority empowered ..... to register a person as a manufacturer under section 11 of the act was duty bound to consider the application of the petitioner for that purpose and the respondent no. 2 in refusing to consider the application on the ground that ..... to remain with any person. i am afraid, whether such a wide proposition can be laid down while interpreting rule 8. he has referred to a.p.s.t. cooperative finance dev. corpn. v. b. pundiah, air 1983 sc 1290 and orissa minor oil (p) ltd. v. state air 1983 orissa 265. the supreme court case goes to .....

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Lalloobhai B. Patel and Co. Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : [1979]43STC146(MP)

..... of the supreme court in kedamath jute . v. commercial tax officer [1965] 16 s.t.c. 607 (s.c.), while construing section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941, which in effect exempts a specified turnover of a dealer from sales tax observed that a 'dealer cannot get the exemption unless he ..... their registration certificates. accordingly, an argument was advanced that the assistant commissioner was in error in denying to the appellant concessional rate of tax under section 8(1) of the act. the deputy commissioner rejected this objection as also the other one raised before him and dismissed the appeal.4. against that order of the ..... furnishes the declaration in the prescribed form'. on a consideration of the relevant provisions of the act and the rules, their lordships observed as follows:we realise that the section .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hassomal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : (1996)133CTR(MP)1; [1996]217ITR636(MP)

..... central board of direct taxes in an effort to clarify the press note and certain circulars issued by the ministry of finance regarding declaration of higher income or wealth. the applicant, therefore, filed an application under section 256(1) of the act before the income-tax appellate tribunal for referring the case to this court. the question of law framed by the ..... of 1978-79, 1979-80 and 1981-81, as rs. 9,000 for the assessment year 1981-82, as rs. 10,000 for each of the assessment years 1982-83 and ..... , prahladrai hassomal. he expired on november 14, 1989. his widow, smt. ishwaribai, was admitted as a partner in this firm. the returns of income for the assessment years 1978-79 to 1983-84 werefiled by the assessee, hassomal, on march 31, 1987, under the amnesty scheme declaring his income as rs. 5,000 for each of the assessment years .....

Nazirkhan S/O Sadekhan Pathan Vs. M.P. Rajya Bhandar Grah Nigam Madhya ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1990MPLJ828

..... principles of natural justice.2. according to the petitioner, respondent no. 1 'nigam' is a statutory body constituted under the provisions of m. p. agricultural warehouse act, 1947 and is financed and totally controlled by the state of m. p. and is 'state' or 'instrumentality of state' under article 12 of the constitution of india. undisputedly the ..... allegations and particulars it was stated, that on 5-4-1986, shri pathan informed the regional manager, indore that the police has registered a case under section 3/7 of e. c. act and had sealed the godowns nos. 9a and 9b, and 1.(iii) that, shri pandit, sr. supdt. went to khachrod for enquiries but found ..... upon by the disciplinary authority would cause prejudice and a denial of resonable opportunity to the delinquent of defending himself. nandkishore prasad v. state of bihar, air 1978 sc 1277 was also referred, wherein, it was observed, that even if a statute dealing with a quashi judicial order does not expressely provide that the party .....

Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Company Law Board and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1969MPLJ295

..... company and to report thereon. now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) of section 237 of the companies act, 1956 (1 of 1956), read with notification of the government of india in the ministry of finance (department of company affairs and insurance) no. g.s.r. 72 dated the 1st january, 1966, ..... -sheets of the subsidiary, the investments ltd., were attached to the balance-sheets of the holding company, namely, the petitioner-company, as required by section 212 of the act. what we have said earlier in connection with the first circumstance about the composition of shareholders of the petitioner-company during the years 1948 to 1959 ..... shri d.p. mandelia, who has been designated as general secretary of the petitioner-company, exercises substantial powers of management within the meaning of section 2(26) of the companies act; that he has received by way of remuneration an amount exceeding rs. 30,000 per month from different companies including the petitioner-company and .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Peoples General Hospital Ltd,

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... circumstances of the case, the income tax appellate tribunal was justified in affirming the decision of the cit(a) deleting the addition made under section 68 of the income tax act despite the fact that the assessee has failed to discharge its onus of proving capacity of creditor who is a non- resident indian- director ..... (p) ltd., we have to see only in respect of the establishment of the identity of the investor. the delhi high court also in divine leasing & finance ltd. (supra), considering the similar question held that the assessee company having received subscriptions to the public/rights issue through banking channels and furnished complete details of the ..... the matter in its proper perspective. he has placed reliance on the following judgments of the different high courts:- (i) commissioner of income tax vs. divine leasing & finance ltd. decided by delhi high court reported as (2008) 299 itr 26.(del); (ii) bhav shakti steel mines (p) ltd. vs. commissioner of income tax decided .....