Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1978 section 19 amendment of section 155 Court: allahabad Page 96 of about 2,540 results (0.166 seconds)

Sep 27 2010 (HC)

Ganesh Polytex Ltd., Raipur. Vs. Union of India and Others.

Court : Allahabad

..... were non-excisable goods in view of note 1 of chapter 54 of the schedule of central excise tariff act (the tariff act). 6. the government of india, ministry of finance issued instructions dated 29.06.2010 under section 37-b of the act. under the instructions, certain goods were explained to be excisable goods. in pursuance of these instructions, the ..... was passed on the next date. the petitioner's goods were earlier held to be non-excisable by the tribunal. the instructions may be issued under section 37-b of the act but it is doubtful if they can nullify a judgement though principles of res-judicata do not apply in taxing statutes. in our opinion, it is ..... any excise duty is leviable on the same. the petitioner has also been filing returns showing them as non-excisable goods. 3. a notice under section 11-a of the central excise act (the act) was issued to the petitioner for charging excise duty on the same. the petitioner filed its reply, which was decided against the petitioner. an appeal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 04 2011 (HC)

Kishnu and Others Vs. Sheesh Pal and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... land before allotment. it was also found that some of the allottees were not residents of the village. it was also found that preference as provided under section 198 of the act was not followed. it has also been found that several persons whose names were there in aakar patra 57 ka (list of deserving candidates) were not ..... 3 to 10 in both the writ petitions mangu and others. the cancellation application was registered as case no.3 of 2006-07 under section 198(4) of u.p.z.a. and l.r. act mangu ram(deceased) vs. land management committee on the file of additional collector (city) ghaziabad. the allotments were cancelled by the additional ..... (4) are not required. in case of stark usurpation of gaon sabha property collector is entitled to take corrective measures. proceedings may be justified under section 33/39 of u.p. land revenue act also. under somewhat similar circumstances (expiry of period of assami lease) it was so held in hari ram v. collector, dist. saharanpur/additional collector, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 22 2011 (HC)

Asok Pande Vs. Union of India

Court : Allahabad

..... and hence no eligibility criteria can be traced for the committee of such a kind. evidently, the impugned resolution was published under part i - section 1 of the gazette wherein non-statutory resolutions are published also supplements the fact that committee does not have any statutory or constitutional force and is ..... 3 scc 81, the municipal council entered into an agreement with a private builder for the construction of a commercial complex. the project envisaged a self-financing scheme through which the builder was to construct the complex at his own cost but after completion of construction was to hand over the complex to the ..... the legislature concentrates in itself the virtual control of both legislative and executive functions; and as the ministers constituting the cabinet are presumably agreed on fundamentals and act on the principle of collective responsibility, the most important questions of policy are all formulated by them. (emphasis supplied) (6) thus, five points which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1990 (HC)

Vinod Kumar Mittal Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1991All1

..... the oil company is in the nature of a contract of personal service andsuch a contract cannot be enforced in view of the provision contained in section 14 of the specific relief act, 1963. his specific plea is that since the contract cannot be specifically enforced, the mandamus prayed for cannot be issued and if mandamus cannot ..... estoppel. the only difference between the case on hand and the case dealt with by their lordships appears to be that there was a statutory duty of the finance coropration to advance loan. in the present case our attention has into been drawn to any statutory provision dealing with the grant of distributorship. however, that in ..... union of india v. godfrey philips india ltd., and 4. 1987 (supp) scc 710 state of bihar v. usha martin industries ltd. 13. section 14(1)(d) of the specific relief act relied upon by the learned counsel for the opposite parties reads as follows:--'14. contracts not specifically enforceable- (1) the following contracts cannot be specifically .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 1949 (PC)

In Re: Raghubir Saran

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1949CriLJ852

..... to review the order about costs will also be rare. tha court will, therefore, be mainly called upon to review the order of punishment under sub-section (1) of section 10 of the act; and as the bar council has nothing to do with the question of punishment there will be no question of making a reference to the bar council. ..... advocates, in view of an order, made by this court, on 20th december 1916, removing him from practice, aa he was found guilty of misconduct, under sub-section (l) of section 10, bar council act (xxxviii [38] of 1926). his prayer ia that he may be granted pardon and permitted to resume practice as an advocates .19. shri raghubir saran: the ..... principle and procedure laid down for review of case3 under the code of civil procedure. the relevant subsection which gives this court power of review is sub-section. (6) of section 12, bar councils act. it ia reproduced below:the high court may, of its own motion cr on application made to it in this behalf, review any order pas- sed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2003 (HC)

Diploma Engineers Association and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC541

..... 197 group d posts. as stated in paragraphs 13 and 16 of thepetition, some of the posts are single posts, e.g., general manager (project/finance), general manager (development), etc. the reservation policy under the 1994 act in applicable to the u. p. s.i.d.c. 21% reservation are for scheduled caste, 2% for scheduled tribes and 27% for other backward ..... after correctly applying the reservation percentage prescribed under the u. p. public services (reservation in favour of the scheduled caste, scheduled tribe and other backward classes) act, 1994, (hereinafter referred to as the 1994 act) in accordance with hundred point roster after taking into account the reservation qua the cadre strength with regard to individual posts and only thereafter to make any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1928 (PC)

Dau Dayal Vs. Pearey Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1928All236; 108Ind.Cas.694

..... however, agree to make advances' though the evidence does not disclose whether they put any limit on the amount of such advances, or left the extent of their financing of the defendants dependent on their own decision. they were at perfect liberty to make, or to refrain from making advances, but they did in fact continue to ..... interest, commission and minor incidental charges, and on the other side the receipts on the defendants' behalf. to the extent that the plaintiffs made advances, they were acting as bankers and the position was that of lender and borrower. to the extent of the receipts, the position was that of principal and agent, with a liability, ..... possession of such funds, will not make any difference in principle. it was agreed in the case before us, that it and when occasion arose, the plaintiffs would act as the defendant's banker by providing money. we have already made it clear that, when the defendants advanced the money, they really borrowed money, on defendants' behalf .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1947 (PC)

Kaluram Kankaria Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1948All28

..... was adjudged an insolvent on 28-3-1932. the receiver appointed by-the court to take charge of the property of the insolvent filed a suit under sections 53 and 54, provincial insolvency act, for annulment of the four mortgages on various grounds. on 12-9-1942, the court ultimately held that the four mortgages were void. the court came ..... -holders of the agra united mills limited for damages on the false allegation that the money lent to the company was in part performance of a larger contract to finance the company, that the maharaja's father was guilty of the breach of contract and there were additional allegations of fraud, collusion and conspiracy. the suit failed but ..... that the mortgages were not foreign to the money-lending business of the assessee. in any case, the expenditure incurred to be an admissible deduction under section 10(2)(xii) of the act must be an expenditure wholly and exclusively for the purpose of such business. it could not be said that the sum of rs. 9070 was spent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 1973 (HC)

Babu Singh Vs. Smt. Champa Devi and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1974All90

..... travelling in the same truck. the truck was going from saharanpur to delhi. after notice to sri babu singh the claimants opposite parties claimed compensation under section 110-a of the motor vehicles act amounting to rs. 27,000/-.3. the claim was contested by the jupiter general insurance co. and sri babu singh. the learned motor accident claims ..... allegation of negligence was made in the claim. (3) the award is bad without any issue on proof of negligence. (4) the driver and the financier i.e. nice finance co. were necessary parlies and th' claim, therefore, is bad on that account. (5) the compensation award is exces-iiv' and has not been accorded in accordance with ..... term but is relative one and is rather a comparative term. what may be negligence in one case may not be so in another.10. section 110-a of the motor vehicles act lays down the procedure for an application for compensation. while there is nothing in the form which requires that the allegation of negligence should be stated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2002 (HC)

Shahjahan Khan Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC598; [2002(93)FLR147]; (2002)1UPLBEC902

..... proved, we fail to understand how the petitioner could have been held guilty of bigamy.8. the tribunal has relied on the decision of the supreme court in ministry of finance v. s.b. ramesh, 1998 (3) scc 227. we have carefully perused the aforesaid decision and, in our opinion, the same is distinguishable.9. in paragraph 8 of the ..... it cannot be inferred that merely because the petitioner lived with champa devi for seven months, he was married to her. in fact, champa devi had filed a case under section 376/366, i.p.c., against the petitioner but the petitioner was acquitted in that criminal case vide judgment dated 11.9.1986 (annexure-11 to the petition).7. in ..... paragraph 13 of its judgment, the tribunal has stated that though the second marriage is not strictly proved by the evidence, yet it is an act unbecoming of a government servant. in our opinion. rule 29 of the government servant conduct rules will only apply if there was a second marriage, i.e., bigamy. since .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //