Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1970 section 26 amendment of act 27 of 1957 Court: jammu and kashmir Page 7 of about 86 results (0.267 seconds)

Paramjeet Kour Vs. J and K State Financial Corporation

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(2)JKJ97

..... 15 days expired so as to give the complainant/respondent a cause of action against the accused.4. indisputably to constitute the offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act it is necessary for the complainant to prove that the accused has issued the cheque which has been dis-honoured and after the dis- ..... any steps to liquidate the amount of rs. 80,000/- within the stipulated period of 15 days. so he has committed the offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act. after the complaint being filed, the learned trial court vide its order dated 7-2-2003 took the cognizance against the accused/petitioner and issued ..... of the negotiable instruments act against the petitioner/accused before the court of learned city judge, judicial magistrate 1st class, jammu on the allegations that the petitioner/accused had set up an industrial unit at kaluchak, jammu after having been financed by the complainant/corporation. the accused / petitioner was to re-pay the installments due .....

Mohd. Shafi Pandit Vs. Mohd. Yousuf Magray and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2003(3)JKJ313

..... this case, order impugned is a judgment amenable to appeal within the meaning of clause 12 of j&k; lp.14. against the order(s) appeal under section 19 of the contempt act of 1997, is not maintainable inasmuch as, by the order(s) in question, the state or any of its officer/official is not punished for contempt of ..... not so. this communication from agriculture co-operative department is for sanction of rs. 65 lacs as loan to the confed which has not been acceded to by the finance department and state government. the communication nowhere refers to the amount for disbursement of the wages/salary of the unpaid employees of the confed. we feel that the ld ..... the appellants submits that the state govt. has so far lent a total of rs. 270.21 lacks to confed and further request of agriculture/co-operative department to finance department for release of 65 lacks as loan to confed, has not been acceded to pursuant to the aforementioned cabinet decision. registrar co-operative was appointed as official .....

Gurbax Rai Aggarwal Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... heading 'through traffic up and down crossing the domel toll stations per trip each way'. their lordships in hans raj's case (supra) after noticing section 3 and schedule to the act observed:from the contents of the schedule it is clear that the statute contemplates levy of toll for crossing upon different roads and bridges in the state ..... of roads and bridges lying within the state. for the purpose of the levy the agency which has constructed the roads or bridges in question or the source of finance for implementation of project are not relevant.thus toll could be levied upon the petitioner if he had used public roads and bridges in the state.5. the dispute ..... exacted by the state or the local authority by virtue of sovereignty or lordship, or in return for protection, more specially, for permission to pass somewhere, do some act, or perform some function. another meaning attributed to the term is a charge for the landing or shipping of goods at a port, a charge made for transport of .....

Dev Raj BhasIn Vs. Parveen Kumar Kandhari

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(3)JKJ395

..... of the court to interpret it consistent with the legislative intent and purpose so as to suppress the mischief and advance the remedy. as stated above, section 138 of the act has created a contractual breach as an offence and the legislative purpose is to promote efficacy of banking and of ensuring that in commercial or contractual ..... account. withdrawal of the entire amount would therefore mean that there were no funds in the account to honour the cheque which squarely brings the case within section 138 of the act. on the question of strict interpretation of penal provisions raised on behalf of the accused it was observed: 'if the interpretation, which is sought for, ..... criminal) 2005 (4) 511.9. refuting the submissions advanced by mr. puri, mr. oswal relies upon a judgment of the hon'ble karnataka high court rendered in 'deepa finance corporation v. a.k. mohammed' 2001 cr.l.j. 3582, in which the hon'ble bench observed that once the cheque is issued from a non-existent account, .....

Northern Sanitation Vs. Hotel Corporation of India

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... made by it; e)-- that the arbitrator conducted misconduct in entertaining fresh claims from the opposite party which had not been raised in the petition under section 20, arbitration act; f)-- that the arbitrator committed legal misconduct in having given a lump sum award keeping in view the fact that most of the claims submitted by ..... the facts of the present case. in that case a specific objection was taken by the state while opposing the application of the contractor filed under section 20, arbitration act that the contractor was not entitled to extra costs for material and labour in terms of the contract and the court had directed that the matter had ..... desai, chartered engineer, e.e.m.e., fiv-62 sunder nagar, new delhi and shri t.k. saran retired adviser (construction) bureau of public enterprises, ministry of finance, government of india, as arbhrators, out of the names of arbitrators furnished by both the parties, who were directed to enter upon the reference and submit their award. .....

Chenab Forest Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : [1974]96ITR568(J& K)

..... the light of several decisions of the courts on which he has relied, it would be clear that the assessee was entitled to a deduction under section 28 read with section 37 of the act. it was also contended that the nature of business was such that the assessee had to keep his business going on, had to advance money to ..... section 10(1) are what are understood to be such under ordinary commercial principles.6. in another decision of the supreme court in the case of commissioner of income-tax v. basumal jagat narain, [1960] 38 i.t.r. 447 (punj.), which was a case where the assessee was a distributer and as an exhibitor of films he financed ..... relevant here to quote a passage from iyengar's income tax commentary, 6th edition, volume 1, page 911, which runs as follows:'specific section v. residuary section.--section 36(1)(vii) vis-a-vis section 37(1). both section 36(1)(vii) andsection 37(1) cover losses incurred in business. the claim under either head would only be maintainable if the loss is .....

Rattan Singh Vs. Indian Overseas Bank and Others

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... the nationalized banks are not statutory in character except in respect of matter concerning grant of pension which is covered by regulations framed in terms of section 19 of the banking companies act,1970. it may be true that the nationalized banks like state bank of india may be covered by the expression state or its agencies within the meaning ..... was primarily beneficial to the banks. the ultimate aim and object of floating such a scheme as has been stated in the circular letter issued by the ministry of finance was for the purpose of effective functioning of the banks so as to enable them to compete with the private banks. 48. the employees of the nationalized bank ..... 1955. by virtue of provisions under section 43(1) of 1955 act the central board of the state bank of india then made state bank of india officers service rules. referring to para 47, mr. gupta has argued that vrs framed by state bank of india and patiala is traceable to ministry of finances circular dated 22.05.2000 which .....

Karmat Ullah Vs. State and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2008(3)JKJ319

..... this habeas corpus petition, the petitioner seeks quashment of detention order no. 04 of 2008 dated 17,05,2008 passed by district magistrate, rajouri under section 8 of the j&k; public safety act, 1978.2. the grounds of detention reveal that the petitioner remained associated with the local terrorists of hm outfit known with code name jannisar and ..... public at large in j&k; state and in india. the petitioner being an overground worker of hm terrorist, was found involved in aiding and abetting terrorism by financing and providing food and shelter to the militants. the detention order reveals that in the month of july and september, 2007 terrorist of hm outfit code name jannisar visited ..... the transaction of hawala money to boost the militancy related activities.3. the detention order also reveals that the petitioner was arrested in case fir no. 17/2008 under sections 121/122/120-b/212/216 rpc and 3/eao of police station, kandi and pair of action shoe, no. 7,10 hand phones (nokia), one shirt, .....

Hari Om Singh Vs. Dr. Karan Singh

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR1980J& K57

..... be an emphatic 'no'. a returned candidate may delay the filing of the written statement and no premium can be put on such delay for the purpose of section 86(4) of the act. thus, the application is beyond the presecribed period and not maintainable.10. the reliance placed by mr. l. k. sharma on air 1958 raj 307 in support ..... the facts stated in my application are true to my knowledge'. 4. mr. l. k. sharma learned counsel for the petitioner-applicant submits that under section 86 sub-section (4) of the representation of the people act, 1951, the applicant, who is a defeated candidate has the statutory right to be joined as a respondent. it is argued that subject to the ..... dass thakur, the defeated candidate, who has been the judge of this hon'ble court and who has also held a portfolio of justice since 1975 and continued to hold finance now is not only pulling the chain behind the scene, but is the real stage manager and only wants to keep his identity concealed.' 3. the affidavit which has .....

Krishan Lal Sudan Vs. Rajesh Kohli

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : AIR2007J& K68,2008(3)JKJ46

..... denying his status as his landlord, submits the plaintiff. it is urged by him that use of word 'shall' in section 12(4) of the jammu and kashmir houses and shops rent control act indicates the provision to be mandatory. respondent-plaintiff additionally submits that the revision petitions had been filed by the petitioner-defendant to ..... controller, jammu. this material, according to the respondent was sufficient enough for the trial court to pass an order under section 12(4) of the jammu and kashmir houses and shops rent control act.5. after having executed rent deed in his favour, the petitioner-tenant was estopped from leading any parole evidence to disprove ..... filed by respondent rajesh kohli against the petitioner-tenant, learned sub-ordinate judge, jammu, the trial court passed an order under section 12(4) of the jammu and kashmir houses and shops rent control act, 1966 directing the petitioner-defendant to deposit the arrears of rent of the shop from january, 2007 onwards as also the .....