Court : Gujarat
..... to the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the following conditions that he shall:(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;(c) maintain law and order;(d) not leave the state of gujarat without prior permission of the sessions judge concerned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
ORAL ORDER1. Rule. Mr. RC Kodekar, learned APP, waives service of notice of Rule for the respondent State of Gujarat.2. At the time of hearing of this application, Mr. MH Barejia, learned advocate for the applicant does not press this application and seeks leave to withdraw the same.3. Mr. RC Kodekar, learned APP has no objection if leave as prayed for is granted.4. Hence, leave to withdraw the application is granted. The application stands disposed of as it is withdrawn. Rule is discharged. (A.M.KAPADIA, J.)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... to the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the following conditions that he shall:(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;(c) maintain law and order;(d) not leave the state of gujarat without prior permission of the sessions judge concerned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... to the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the following conditions that he shall:(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;(c) maintain law and order;(d) not leave the state of gujarat without prior permission of the sessions judge concerned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... to the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the following conditions that he shall:(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;(c) maintain law and order;(d) not leave the state of gujarat without prior permission of the sessions judge concerned .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
..... .i-49 of 2010 registered before kawant police station, dist. vadodara.2. learned counsel for the applicant submitted that initially case registered against the applicant was under section 325 of the indian penal code for which he was also granted bail. however, subsequently, due to some medical complications, the injured person died, due to which ..... the satisfaction of the lower court and subject to the following conditions that he shall:(a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;(c) maintain law and order;(d) not leave the state of gujarat without prior permission of the sessions ..... section 302 of the indian penal code was also added. she drew my attention to the dying declaration of the deceased recorded by executive magistrate to contend that in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
ORAL ORDER1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Pahwa for the petitioner. Learned advocate invited attention of the Court to order dated 15.2.2010 passed by this Court (Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.S. Jhaveri) in Special Civil Application No.11143 of 2009 and other matters. Learned advocate states that after aforesaid order dated 15.2.2010, the petitioner filed an application dated 28.2.2010. He further states that upto 30.11.2010, the Corporation accepted rent from the petitioner, but in the month of December 2010, they refused to accept rent/licence fee.1.1. The learned advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in receipt of a caveat application filed by the respondent Corporation in the Court of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Gondal which discloses that the Corporation proposes to take possession of the stalls, including that of the petitioner. The learned advocate invited attention of the Court to para 1 of the caveat application, wherein it is stated that, 'pursu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
ORAL ORDERRule. Learned APP, Shri KP Raval, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.Petitioner-convict has prayed for parole to attend his mother sickness. His jail record suggests that he has already been undergone sentence of more than 10 years and 1 month, during which period, he has been released on several occasions and he has returned on time on each occasions.Under the circumstances, petitioner is ordered to be released on furlough leave for a period of 14 days on depositing a sum of Rs.10,000/-. Upon completion of the period, he shall surrender before the jail authorities.This order shall be communicated to the petitioner in jail. Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
ORAL ORDERRule. Learned APP, Mr.K.P.Raval, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent-State.Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that allegations in the compliant is totally false. Other accused have been granted bail. He invited my attention to order dated 30th December, 2010 passed by cognate bench in Criminal Misc. Application No.15775 of 2010.Insofar as petitioner No.1 is concerned, he stands on parity with the order passed by this Court on 30th December, 2010. In his case, therefore, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail.With respect to petitioner Nos. 2 and 3, however, I find that as per the complaint, they were allegedly carrying fire arms. They had also fired at the time of the incident. This being a case of anticipatory bail, I am of the opinion that their request should not be considered.Counsel for the petitioner, however, submitted that petitioner No.1 has the license to carry fire arm. The petitioner Nos.2 and 3 were with petitioner No.1 and therefore, thei...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Gujarat
ORAL ORDER1. RULE. Learned A.P.P. waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State.2. Petitioner-convict has sought parole to help his family, who is in financial distress. His jail record suggests that he has served sentence of more than 12 years, including period of set of, during which time he has enjoyed temporary relief on several occasions and reported on time.3. Under the circumstances, the petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a period of 14 days on his depositing a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand) before the jail authority. Upon completion of parole, the applicant surrender himself before the jail authority.4. Rule made absolute to the aforesaid extent.5. This order be communicated to the petitioner by the registry....
Tag this Judgment!