Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1970 chapter i preliminary Court: rajasthan Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 7 results (0.083 seconds)

Aug 31 2006 (HC)

Roop Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-31-2006

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj3323

..... 'investigation of charges and trial by court-martial - power of commanding officer'. these are general provisions applicable in all cases including summary court-martial. section 2 of chapter v deals with general and district courts-martial, while section 3 deals with summary court-martial. we shall refer to the provisions relating to summary court-martial a little ..... stoppage of pay and allowances. under section 72 these punishments are to be inflicted in connection with the offences committed by the persons subject to the army act. offences are specified under chapter vi comprising of sections 34 to 70. while sections 34 to 68 are. offences special to the persons subjected to the army ..... of the punishment which was rejected on 2.11.1994.8. in writ petition no. 2272/1996, petitioner devendra singh was enrolled in the army on 16.10.1970. a court of inquiry was ordered to investigate into circumstances in which he allegedly entered the house of nk b.l. chouhan on 23.9.1987 and his possible .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2006 (HC)

Mahesh Chandra Tak Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-03-2006

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj838; 2006(2)WLC559

..... follows:pending consideration, the prayer made by the petitioner to get the matter investigated by the cbi, we consider it appropriate that the committee already constituted by the finance secretary to look into the allegations made in the instant petition and submit a preliminary report. the said committee shall be presided by shri m.d. vaishnav, ..... the residence of vice-chancellor and thereby she conferred financial gain on herself. in order to give rational look, it has been made effective from the year 1970, knowing well that no former vice-chancellor will be in position to raise such bills, or even if raised, it must be meagre in comparison to bills ..... the learned counsel for the respondents stands rejected. similarly, there is no substance 'in the contention raised that the petitioner has an alternate remedy available under the lokayukt act.16. coming to the merits of the case, it is submitted by mr. bhoot learned, counsel for the petitioner, that the vaishnav committee has found the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 05 2006 (HC)

Arvind Kumar Joshi Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-05-2006

Reported in : RLW2006(4)Raj3149

..... steps to safeguard the rights of the persons with disabilities is also envisaged.3. the bill seeks to achieve the above objects.13. chapter 6 of the act of 1995 deals with the reservation of posts in various services and seats in various educational institutions of the state. section 32 of the ..... (i) in relation to the central government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that government, or a cantonment board constituted under the cantonment act, 1924, the central government (ii) in relation to a state government or any establishment wholly or substantially financed by that government or any local authority, other than a cantonment board, the ..... state government. 'blindness' has also been defined in section 2(b) of the act of 1995 according to which blindness refers to a condition where a person suffers .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2006 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Dhariwal and Co. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-08-2006

Reported in : RLW2007(1)Raj123

..... and reliance has been placed on the judgment in umarani's case and haldiram bhujiawala's case.28. i have considered the submissions. so far the principle propounded in shreeram finance corporation's case is concerned, there is no dispute about the legal proposition. likewise learned counsel rightly relied upon division bench judgment of this court, in sohan lal bansant ..... is not liable. in that case hon'ble the supreme court referred to a decision of the house of lords, in henderson v. henry e. jenkins and sons reported in 1970 a.c.j. 198 (h.l. england), in which case, the lorry driver applied the brakes of the lorry on a steep hill, but they failed to operate, as ..... to firm or to partners in firms which have no place of business in the territories to which this act extends, or whose places of business in the said territories are situated in the areas to which, by notification under section 56, this chapter does not apply, or(b) to any suit or claim of set-off not exceeding one hundred rupees .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2006 (HC)

Bhuri Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-11-2006

Reported in : RLW2007(2)Raj997

..... possession was in violation of section 42. in the year 1973 the respondents 4 to 7 also filed a suit for declaring the decree dated july 20, 1970 as null and void. the petitioner raised objection regarding maintainability of suit in revenue court. the suit was dismissed vide judgment dated june 7,1976. the respondents ..... did not appear the sub divisional officer deeg proceeded exparte and decreed the suit vide judgment dated july 20, 1970. the respondents filed first appeal on june 23, 1973 along with the application under section 5 of limitation act, 1963. on receiving notices the petitioners raised preliminary objections. the appeal came to be dismissed vide judgment dated ..... savarna caste and the same is hit by section 42 of the act. on such application the reference was made vide order dated october 28, 1996. the board vide judgment dated september 8, 1997 accepted the reference and cancelled the decree dated july 20, 1970. the review filed by petitioner was dismissed vide order may 31, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2006 (HC)

Ashish Tea Company and anr. Vs. Miraj Products Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-09-2006

Reported in : 2007(34)PTC246(Raj)

..... case whatsoever in his favour as the defendant itself has withdrawn the objection. learned counsel for respondent in support of his submission has placed reliance on ruston v. engineering co. : [1970]2scr222 , banga watch co. v. n.v. phillips , bata india limited v. pyare lal & co. : air1985all242 and mahendra and mahendra paper mills ltd. v. mahindra ..... : ptc (suppl)(1) 622(bom), vishnu das trading v. vazir sultan tobacco : air1996sc2275 , hoffmann-la roche & co. ltd. v. geoffrey manner & co. pvt. ltd. : [1970]2scr213 and r.g. anand v. delux films : [1979]1scr218 .11. on the other hand, the learned counsels respondent-plaintiff submitted that it is a case where the trial court ..... of the trade marks act of 1940). no evidence has been led by the respondent company that the respondent-company had really intended or even now intends to manufacture any other product of tobacco other than cigarettes.20. in hoffmann-la roche & co. ltd. v. geoffrey manner & co. pvt. ltd. air 1970 sc 2262, the hon .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2006 (HC)

Santosh (Smt.) and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-20-2006

Reported in : RLW2007(1)Raj702

..... is viiith standard with auxiliary nurse midwifery training/female health worker course. determination of vacancies is made with reference to the post duly sanctioned by the finance department of the government in the cadre strength under the said rules.3. the chief medical and health officer, barmer published an advertisement on 17th may ..... requirement for public employment is respected, there cannot be much difficulty in coming to the conclusion that it is ordinarily not proper for the courts whether acting under article 226 of the constitution orunder article 32 of the constitution, to direct absorption in permanent employment of those who have been engaged without ..... according to him while procedure for urgent temporary appointment is contained in rule 27 which is contained in chapter vi of the rules, provisions for regular appointment are enumerated in rule 16 which falls under chapter iv of the rules. since the appointment of the petitioners was made specifically on contract basis on a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //