Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Feb-25-1999
Reported in : 1999CriLJ3626; 2000(1)WLC328
..... is only in grave situation that the police official is charged with the duty of maintenance of 'public order'. the duty to maintain law and order arises out of the chapters xi & xii of the code of criminal procedure, wherein the police is supposed to! prevent the commission of a cognizable offence, arrest the persons if the offence is committed, ..... and (d) disputes as to immoveable property. it is obvious that if a member of the police force is asked to discharge duties on any of the subject matters of chapter x, it will be said that he is charged with the duty of maintenance of 'public order'.--15. a police official is required to perform multifarious duties such as maintenance ..... 1661 : 1970 cri lj 1401 (supra) also it was pointed out that it would be open to the appellant (the 2nd respondent in this case) to place the material on record during the course of the trial for showing what his duty was and also that the acts complained of were so inter-related with his official duty so as to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Feb-15-1999
Reported in : 1999(3)WLC371; 1999(1)WLN276
..... accrued to a large number of persons during the intervening period. the constitution bench of the supreme court, in rabindra nath bose v. union of india : [1970]2scr697 , observed as under-it could not have been the intention that this court would go into stale demands after a lapse of years....13. the aforesaid judgment ..... in m.p. raghvan nair v. state insurance officer and ors. : (1971)illj196ker and it observed as under-the principle underlying statutory provisions like the limitation act...are applicable to petitions under article 226 of the constitution. these provisions are not to be regarded as embodying technical rules of procedure. they are based upon ..... .' while deciding this case, the court placed reliance upon the halsbury's law of england (vol. 24) 181, which is as under--the policy of limitation acts.--the courts have expressed at least three different reasons supporting the existence of statutes of limitation, namely, (1) that long dormant claims have more of cruelty than .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-30-1999
Reported in : AIR2000Raj59
..... of land was against the prohibitory orders of the state government and, therefore, not enforceable.18. the assistant land records officer vide his judgment dated 22-4-1970 has held that the disputed land khasra no. 13 occupied by the petitioner was part of khasra no. 14 belonging to the answering respondent. itshould be ..... case of the petitioner cannot be considered within the ambit of rule 20 of the rajasthan land revenue (allotment for agricultural purposes) rules of 1970 (referred to hereinafter as 'the rules of 1970'). the collector upheld the order of the tehsildar (revenue), abu road, vide its order dated 3-3-1980, produced with the petition as ..... of section 117 of the transfer of property act such act has no application unless notified by the state government. no notification of the application of chapter v of the transfer of property act has been issued by the state government. therefore, the provisions of the transfer of property act have no application and in this background the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Decided on : Sep-24-1999
Reported in : (2000)IIILLJ691Raj; 2000(2)WLC22
..... and the courts may, make it mandatory on the part of the individual, whose rights are in question, to furnish required information or to do any other act necessary for effective protection and enforcement of his rights. the preamble to the constitution of india, shows that the object behind constituting india into a sovereign socialist secular ..... ground that the petition for implementation of the award was not maintainable and the petitioner be relegated to the alternative remedy under section 33(c) of the industrial disputes act. the learned single judge upheld the preliminary objection and dismissed the writ petition by judgment dated january 22, 1992. against the said judgment, a special appeal was ..... facts of the case. the apex court in tilokchand motichand v. h.b. munshi air 1970 sc 898 has observed that there is no lower limit and there is no upper limit. a case may be brought within limitation act by reason of some article but writ court need not necessarily give the total time to the .....
Tag this Judgment!