Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1970 chapter i preliminary Court: madhya pradesh Page 12 of about 113 results (0.067 seconds)

Shailja Timoti and anr. Vs. Sabhan Khan and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2008ACJ2221

..... . submission of mrs. janhavi pandit is that by removal of the spleen the claimant-appellant has suffered immensely. in harrison's principles of internal medicine, vol. 1, chapter 54, while dealing with the enlargement of lymph nodes and spleen at page 348, the learned author has observed as under:the most serious consequence of splenectomy is the ..... the changes in the value of money.11. their lordships also referred to the decision rendered in the case of c.k. subramonia iyer v. t. kunhi kuttan nair 1970 acj 110 (sc), wherein it has been held as under:(13) .. .in assessing damages, the court must exclude all considerations of matter which rest in speculation or fancy ..... sections 279, 337 and 338 of the indian penal code. because of the injuries caused by shailja initiated an action under section 166 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (for brevity 'the act') before the motor accidents claims tribunal, chhindwara which formed the subject-matter on m.v.c. no. 80 of 2000 wherein she claimed a sum of .....

Gannon Dunkerley and Co. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(5)MPHT258

..... to its members, officers and other employees and for meeting the other administrative expenses exceeding five per cent of its total expenses during that financial year.chapter ix makes special provisions regarding responsibility of employers (section 44); responsibility for payment of wages and compensation (section 45); and the notice of commencement of ..... 1996, rules of 1998, and the construction workers act, 1996. it is contended that, the reference to factories act, 1948 is a misconception because the nature of construction being undertaken are not those undertaken for achieving the object delineated under chapters iii and iv under the heading health and safety. commenting upon the ..... the nature of taxing statute, i.e., an act making compulsory imposition of cess.15. about the beneficial legislation it has been observed by their lordships of the supreme court in works manager, central railway workshop jhansi v. vishwanath and ors. : air 1970 sc 488, paragraph 11:it is probably true that .....

M/S. Maihar Cement Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... of distance. the limitation starts running from the date of discovery of mistake and, therefore stands excluded by operation of s.17(1)(c) of the limitation act, 1963 act 21 of 1963 and that s.78b has no application to the facts in this case. in consequence, the high court and the tribunal have committed error of ..... to create new disability or obligations or impose new duties in respect of transactions which were complete at the time the amending act came into force. (see nani gopal mitra v. state of bihar, [(1969) 2 scr 411] = (air 1970 sc 1636). 26. in chairman, railway board and others v. c.r. rangadhamaiah and others (air 1997 sc 3828), ..... to entertain any time barred claim in absence of any provision in this regard in the railways act itself. 9. as such, board's letters referred to above are hereby withdrawn with immediate effect. 10. this issues with the concurrence of the finance of ministry of railways. 11. please acknowledge receipt of this letter.(s.r. sett)director traffic .....