Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1970 chapter i preliminary Court: allahabad Page 31 of about 304 results (0.939 seconds)

Dec 18 1981 (HC)

Alim and ors. Vs. Taufiq and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1264

ORDERN.N. Sharma, J.1. This revision is directed against order of Sri Chandra Prakash learned Sessions Judge Moradabad dated 30-3-1981 in Criminal Revision No. 198 of 1980 by which the order of discharge recorded by Sri S. K. Samadhya, Munsif Magistrate III Moradabad in case No. 1031/9 of 78 was quashed and the learned Magistrate was ordered to proceed in accordance with law in the light of observations made by learned Judge in his order.2. It appears that these proceedings were initiated on complaint by Smt. Taufiqa Khatoon against the revisionist on 1st Sept. 77 Under Section 396 IPC in the court of C. J. M. Moradabad. Briefly stated the-allegations were that the revisionists were colluding with local police at Police Station Moghalpura in Moradabad city; it was at their instance that on 6-8-'77 while male members of the family of complainant were in lock up all these revisionists variously armed intruded the house of complainant at the dead of night and resorted to indis-scriminate ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 1974 (HC)

Sardar Jas Karan Singh Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1974CriLJ728

ORDERYashoda Nandan, J.1. The applicant was prosecuted before the learned City Magistrate, Saharanpur for an offence punishable under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 - hereinafter referred to as the Act.2. A preliminary objection was raised to the prosecution on behalf of the accused. It was contended that Section 22 (sic) of the Act and Rule 51 of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules. 1945 - hereinafter referred to as the Rules - make it obligatory for an inspector to obtain sanction for prosecution from the Controlling Authority i. e. the Director of Public Health. It was urged that the prosecution of the applicant had been launched bv P. W. 1 Sri S. K. Bishnoi, Inspector of Drugs, not on the basis of a sanction obtained from the Controlling Authority, who happened to be the Director of Public Health tout on the basis of one accorded by the Assistant Controller of Drugs, U. P. vide his letter No. 4862 dated 28th September, 1967 which is on record.3. On a consideration of the relevant prov...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2010 (HC)

Megh Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

1. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- i) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the notification dated 9.8.2004 issued under the purported exercise of the powers conferred under sub-Section 1 of Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 pertaining to village Kisanpur, Pargana & Tahsil Koil, District Aligarh. ii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the notification dated 3.8.2005 issued under the purported exercise of the powers conferred Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, pertaining to village Kisanpur, Pargana & Tahsil Koil, District Aligarh. iii) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents concerned to free Khasra No. 360 & 361 admeasuring 0.0800 & 0.4260 hectares respectively situate at Village Kisanpur, Pargana & Tahsil Koil, District Aligarh from acquisition. 2. Encapsulated facts of the case are that the petitioner has been the bhum...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2011 (HC)

Har Karan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

1. We have heard Sri Pankaj Dubey for the petitioners. Sri M.C. Chaturvedi, learned Chief Standing Counsel assisted by Dr. Y.K. Saxena, standing counsel appears for the State respondents. Sri Ramendra Pratap Singh appears for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority. Sri Naveen Sinha assisted by Sri Rahul Agarwal appears for M/s Supertech Ltd – impleaded respondent in writ petition No. 27396 of 2010. 2. The petitioners are original tenure holders, purchasers, and a Society recorded as owners in revenue records of the land in village Patwari, Tehsil, Dadari, District Gautam Buddha Nagar. 3. By these eleven writ petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the notification dated 12.3.2008 under Section 4 (1), applying Section 17 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short, the Act) proposing to acquire a total area of about 589.188 hectares of land in the village Patwari, Pargana Dadri, District Gautam Budh Nagar, for public p...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //