Court : Kolkata
..... case the tribunal was justified in law to allow the claim of deduction made under section 80-1a of the said act without considering the explanation to sub-section 13 of section 80-1a of the said act as substituted by finance (2) act, 2009. iii) whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the tribunal was justified in law to ..... set aside the order passed by the c.i.t.under section 263 of the said act on the ground that the order of the assessing ..... 09.09.2011 for the impugned assessment year i.e.2009-2010 did not satisfy the twin conditions required for invoking the revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the said act, in so far as its claim for deduction under section 801a was concerned. let requisite number of paper books be prepared containing all relevant papers within six weeks from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
..... , the assessee company is not eligible for deduction under section 80ia(4) of the said act ?. (b) whether the learned tribunal failed to appreciate that in terms of the explanation appended to section 80ia (13).as introduced by the finance act, 2007, and amended by finance act, 2009, clarifies that a person who enters into a contract with another person for executing ..... a works contract will not be eligible to claim deduction under section 80ia of the said act and exemption will be denied to him ?. let requisite number of ..... stand dismissed. let the appeal appear in the monthly list of january, 2015. g.a.no.1983 of 2014 is thus disposed of. all parties concerned are to act on a signed photocopy of this order on the usual undertakings. (soumitra pal, j.) (arindam sinha, j.) km ar(cr)
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
..... order sheet in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction original side ap no.658 of 2014 l & t finance ltd.versus simplex projects ltd.ap no.726 of 2014 l & t finance ltd.versus sinplex projects ltd.before: the hon'ble justice biswanath somadder date : 6th august, 2014. mr.p.sinha, adv. for the petitioner mr.deepak agarwal, adv. for ..... the respondent the court : both these applications, being a.p.658 of 2014 and a.p.726 of 2014, are under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
..... order sheet ga no.2181 of 2014 apot no.347 of 2014 ap no.1347 of 2013 in the high court at calcutta civil appellate jurisdiction original side srei equipment finance limited versus sree metaliks limited & anr before: the hon'ble chief justice mrs.manjula chellur the hon'ble justice banerjee date : 6th august, 2014. appearance: mr.swatarup banerjee, ld. advocate ..... for the appellant. the court :- this appeal would relate to an order dated june 18, 2014. the learned judge discharged the receiver from further acting. hence, this appeal. mr.appearing swatarup banerjee, for the appellant would learned advocate inform this court, service was attempted but postal authority returned the undelivered packet with the remark gone .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
..... 2014 apot no.382 of 2014 ap no.212 of 2014 in the high court at calcutta civil appellate jurisdiction original side l & t finance ltd versus mandeep gupta and anr before: the hon'ble justice banerjee,acting chief justice the hon'ble justice sahidullah munshi date : 1st august, 2014. appearance: mr.partha banerjee, ld. advocate for the appellant. the court :- despite .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
..... matter had been adjourned previously since the respondent had submitted that the disputes would be resolved after a meeting with the chief 2 executive officer of the finance company. the finance company says that there is no attempt at settlement. since a substantial sum remains due under the agreed terms recorded in the order disposing of the ..... should be given to it in view of its financial constraints. the petitioner says that this is the second petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, the firs.having been disposed of on the basis of the terms agreed to by the parties. the petitioner says that the respondent is in breach ..... previous petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, it is necessary that the respondent be put on terms.the petitioner says that the agreement .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
..... case, it appears that interest of justice will be served if the concerned responded authorities take appropriate steps on the basis of the proposal of the joint secretary, finance department, west bengal dated 30th september 2013, relevant portion whereof has been referred to hereinabove, particularly in a fact situation when the concerned respondent was directed by an ..... stopped since 8th april, 2000.d.during pendency of the instant writ petition the said institute was taken over by the state of west bengal under the said act of 2002 whereupon the petitioner exercised option to carry on her duty as a teaching staff of the institute. on an application in the pending writ petition, ..... to submit joint the secretary responded by contending inter alia as follows: a. section 4(2)(i) to section 4(2)(i)(iv)(a) of the said act of 2002 construe that the writ petitioner as a research assistant, was holding a non teaching post ranking between superintendent and senior assistant.b.the post of the reader .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
order sheet ga23212014 apot3842014 ap4602014 in the high court at calcutta civil appellate jurisdiction original side l & t finance limited versus goutam singh & anr. before: the hon'ble mr.justice banerjee, acting chief justice the hon'ble justice arijit banerjee date : 30th july, 2014. mr.s.chowdhury, advocate for the appellant. the court : despite service, none appears to oppose this application. hence, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
..... respondents show no interest in the matter and a substantial sum remains due, ap no.723 of 2014, which is a petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make an application before the appropriate authorities for recovery of the vehicle. the application will be considered by the appropriate ..... same and adjust the sale proceeds in protanto satisfaction of the petitioner s claim if an application in such regard is made before the arbitrator under section 17 of the act and due notice thereof is served on the respondents. the receiver stands discharged without being required to file any accounts. there will be no order as to costs. urgent ..... ap no.723 of 2014 in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction l & t finance limited versus pravin kumar & anr. before: the hon'ble justice sanjib banerjee date : 30th july, 2014. mr.paritosh sinha, adv.appears the court : the respondents are not represented despite .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
..... previous service. on a previous petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, in respect of the same arbitral reference, an order was made on april 22, 2014 recording that the receiver had been promised by the firs.respondent that all dues ..... ap no.997 of 2014 in the high court at calcutta ordinary original civil jurisdiction original side srei equipment finance limited versus rakesh kaluram mhatre & anr. before: the hon'ble justice sanjib banerjee date : 28th july, 2014. appearance: mr.s.banerjee, adv.the court : the respondents are not represented despite .....
Tag this Judgment!