Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 Court: orissa Page 20 of about 4,913 results (0.118 seconds)

Bishnu Mohan Jena Vs. Regional Transport Authority and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1996(II)OLR569

..... of change of registration and collection of dues et cetera in respect of the vehicles seized by the corporation under section 29 of the state financial corporation act and subsequently sold to others. the relevant paragraphs of the aforesaid instruction are as follows :'(i) communication of property list by osfc : the osf will ..... state financial corporation (hereinafter called the 'corporation' on 19-1-1996. the vehicle was seized by the corporation under section 29 of 'the state financial corporation act from sunil kumar behera (hereinafter referred to as the 'original owner'). the purchaser in his writ application has prayed for a direction to the regional transport authority ..... on its seizure from previous owner under the provisions of the section 29 of the sfc act, 1951. (iv) transfer of ownership : in spite of the fact that arrear pertaining to the previous periods in respect of vehicle financed by osfc is pending, transfer of ownership should be effected in the name of the subsequent .....

Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [2003]116CompCas557(Orissa); [2003]262ITR553(Orissa)

..... 1, 1979. in the chapter dealing with aggregation of income and set-off or carry forward of loss in the income-tax act, section 72a was introduced by the finance (no. 2) act, 1977, with effect from april 1, 1978. that provided for carrying forward and setting off of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation ..... the specified authority praying that the scheme of amalgamation be recommended to the central government so that the grant of benefit under section 72a(1) of the act could be considered by the central government. the authority concerned rejected the application. the amalgamated company, the petitioner, had made a further submission and had ..... company court on december 11, 1981, the petitioner, the amalgamated company, on january 15, 1982, made a formal application under section 72a(1) of the act. that application was not recommended by the specified authority. by communication dated may 6, 1983, the concerned authority informed the petitioner that the amalgamation of kalinga tubes .....

Sajeeda Begum and ors. Vs. Divisional Railway Manager (Safety), S.E. R ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : II(2005)ACC615; 2006ACJ1494; 98(2004)CLT762

..... had already occurred at the same level crossing earlier, the railway administration never bothered to put gates, bars, chains as provided under section 18 of the act. the allegations have been refuted in a general way in the counter affidavit. the allegation of previous accidents at the same level crossing has not been specifically ..... same view that jurisdiction under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution can be invoked and direction for payment of compensation can be given if there was deliberate act of negligence on the part of the statutory authorities, namely, the railway administration.8. the concept is, therefore, clear that the writ court is not ..... .6. as against this, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that a writ court is not debarred from awarding reasonable compensation, if there is deliberate act of negligence on the part of the statutory authorities and that in appropriate cases, compensation has been awarded by the apex court and this court in the .....

Banka Das, Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1993CriLJ442; 1992(II)OLR395

..... matters it is of utmost importance that the court should not make any obiter observations on points not directly raised before it for its decision. in air 1968 sc 647 (state of orissa v. sudbansu sekhar misra) it was held that a decision is only an authority for what it actually decides and ..... objects and intention, the drastic provisions made to tackle the menace and the safeguards provided by the very statute against unmerited or mala fide prosecutions:'the act is comparatively a recent statute enacted with the object of meeting the unprecedented challenge of illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. drug abuses have ..... attentively to what legislature does not. say. when construing statutes enacted in the national interest, we nave necessarily to take broad factual situations contemplated by the act and interpret its provision so as to advance and not to thwart the particular national interest whose advancement is proposed by the legislation. (see life insurance .....

Benudhar Padhan Vs. Madan Dharua and Another

Court : Orissa

..... overturned on the deceased resulting in his instantaneous death.9. further placing reliance upon the judgment of the hon ble supreme court in the case of m/s. godavari finance co. vs. degala satyanarayanama & ors., (2008) 5 scc 107.mr. mishra submitted that 6 the owner in actual possession of the vehicle is the person liable ..... the vehicle despite the fact that the same was requisitioned by the district magistrate in exercise of the power conferred upon him under the representation of the people act. a vehicle is requisitioned by a statutory authority, pursuant to the provisions contained in a statute. the owner of the vehicle cannot refuse to abide by the ..... person can be prosecuted against.15. the hon ble supreme court in the case of godavari finance co (supra), held as under: 15. an application for payment of compensation is filed before the tribunal constituted under section 165 of the act for adjudicating upon the claim for compensation in respect of accident involving the death of, or .....

Gudialabandha Grama Sasan Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1981Ori40

..... 3. in the counter filed by opposite party no. 2 it is maintained that the cattle market at balijoda came into being for the first time in the year 1968 and that the cattle market at dukura has been functioning on each saturday for the last many years. it is also contended that the collector did not adjudicate the dispute ..... opportunity was given, no such affidavit was filed.5. it is common ground that there was a dispute touching the finance of the petitioner and opposite party no, 2 as contemplated under section 146 (1) (a) (ii) of the act and an appeal against the decision of the collector lies to the revenue divisional commissioner under section 146 (2) of ..... in nature. the distinction between a quasi judicial and a pure administrative decision lies in the mode or manner in which the opinion on the basis of which the act is done by the authority in exercise of its discretion is formed. the decision would be quasi-judicial of in reaching that decision the authority is required first to .....

Orissa Stores Vs. Assistant Sales Tax Officer and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1973]31STC516(Orissa)

..... the situation from time to time and, therefore, vests power in the registering authority to make demands from time to time.6. a demand for security under the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941, came up for consideration in the case of durga prosad khaitan v. commercial tax officer and ors. [1957] 8 s.t.c. 105. before the calcutta high ..... security. the commissioner while rejecting the revision application of the petitioner, gave the following reasons :(a) a proceeding under section 12(8) of the act has been taken against the dealer for the years 1967-68 and 1968-69.(b) the assistant sales tax officer, while visiting the shop on 5th december, 1969, demanded inspection of the books of account, but was ..... every dealer is to pay reasonable security as required under section 9(3a) of the o.s.t. act, read with rule 7(l)(a) of the same act. the dealer's admitted tax has gone up to rs. 3,112.89 during 1968-69 and the same would be rs. 3,500 for 1969-70 approximately as revealed from the returns .....

Shyam Sunder Rout Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1595

..... wrong provision having been mentioned while taking cognizance. there is much force in the contention since except from mentioning sections 27 and 37 of the orissa forest act in the order taking cognizance, there was never any allegation against the petitioner under those sections. the only allegation against him was of the raid party having ..... admitted by the learned additional government advocate that as per the allegations in the prosecution report, no offence under sections 27 and 37 of the orissa forest act was committed. it is his submission however that the petitioner was all throughout aware of the allegations against him which were contained in the prosecution report copy ..... by the range officer, aska, detailing the allegations against the petitioner and mentioning that he had committed offences under sections 27 and 37 of the orissa forest act as also under the orissa timber and other forest produce transit rules, 1980. the learned magistrate recorded an order on 22-6-1981/20-6-1981 .....

Debendranath Sarangi Vs. Kulamani Sarangi and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1974Ori166; 39(1973)CLT1005

..... a part of their own plot, so that the plaintiffs against whom time was running ought, if they exercised due vigilance, to be aware of what was happening. the act of opening a window affecting the alleged privacy of the plaintiffs amounts to daily intimation that the defendants are possessing the suit land and using the same in their own ..... limitation act would apply. thus, in order to succeed, the onus is on the plaintiffs to prove that they were in possession within 12 years prior to the institution of the ..... as contended by the defendants. i am of opinion that the petition was rightly rejected. 8. the present suit was filed on 13-10-1960. therefore, old limitation act of 1908 applies. it being the plaintiff's case that while they were in possession they were dispossessed by the defendants about 1959 or 1960, article 142 of the old .....

Surajmal Kashiprasad (by Kashiprasad Jhunjhunwala) Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 28(1962)CLT195; (1962)IILLJ575Ori

..... of the statutory provisions have been complied with or not. merely because there will be practical difficulties in enforcing the provisions of section 4(1) of the act, in view of the limitations imposed by that, contravention of that section, would amount to a continuing offence.17. for these reasons the revision petition is allowed ..... contention, if in the petition of complaint it was further alleged that the petitioner had committed an offence under sub-section (2) of section 4 of the act. that sub-section (already quoted) says that the establishment shall be registered on receipt of the statement and the prescribed fee and further that the registration ..... also issue a registration certificate to the employer. the employer is further directed to display prominently the certificate at his establishment.6. it is admitted that the act came into force in the municipal town of cutback on 15 august 1958. the petitioner's establishment was in existence in the said municipality prior to the .....