Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 section 9 amendment of section 80k Sorted by: old Court: gujarat Page 1 of about 824 results (0.161 seconds)

Oct 08 1985 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat-ii Vs. Ahmedabad Maskati Cloth Dea ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1986)50CTR(Guj)283; [1986]162ITR142(Guj)

..... -section(1) of section 80p provides that where, in the case of an assessee being a co-operative society ..... ), 81(iii) and 81(iv) of the act, section 81(iv) being a verbatim reproduction of section 14(5) with the whodunit (1) 'income of co-operative reproduction after the amendment brought about by the finance (no. 2) act, 1967, with effect from april 1, 1968, section 81(iv) was replaced by section 10(29) and section 81(i) was replaced by section 80p with which we are concerned. sub .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 28 1986 (HC)

Additional Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Chandravilas Hotel

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1987]165ITR300(Guj)

..... 1968-69, the explanation which was inserted by the finance act, 1964, is relevant for our purpose and it read as follows : 'explanation - where the total income returned by any person is less than eighty per cent. of the total income (hereinafter in this explanation referred to as the correct income) as assessed under section 143 or section 144 or section ..... the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particular of such income. it may be pointed out that, prior to its amendment by the finance act, 1964, section 271(1)(c) required that the assessee should have concealed the particulars of his income or deliberately furnished inaccurate particulars of such income, but the ..... terms but by resort to the deeming fiction contained in the explanation. the explanation which was not originally there when section 271(1)(c) was enacted but which was introduced by the finance act, 1964, provides that where the total income returned is less than eighty per cent. of the total income assessed, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1947 (PC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Gujarat I Vs. Rajkot Seeds, Oil and Bullio ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : [1975]101ITR748(Guj)

..... stock could not be regarded as representing 'borrowed money' under rule (2) of part iii of schedule iv of the finance act 2 of 1915. it was necessary for the calculation of tax under the said act to consider what was the capital utilised by the port authority for its business operations and any borrowed money was to be ..... court held that the interest claimed by the assessee-company as interest on borrowed capital for construction the house property in question was not allowable under section 9(1)(iv) of the act of 1922.at the stage when the matter was argued before the income-tax appellate tribunal for assessment years 1960-61 to 1963-64, which ..... for the purposes of any business, profession or vocation carried on by him the profits of which are assessable to tax, subject to the various allowances mentioned in the section, and the relevant portion of clause (vi) was'(iv) where the property has been acquired, constructed, repaired, renewed or reconstructed with borrowed capital, the amount of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 21 1954 (HC)

Kanbi Babu Vs. the State

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : 1955CriLJ1522

..... there and would produce them and since the discovery was made in consequence of the information received from the accused, the statement is admissible in evidence under section 27, evidence act, the production of the murkis and the omkar is proved by the fanch nauia jutha ex. 16, despite the tact that, the accused has denied having ..... does not open his mouth cannot be urged against him. one must remember also that very frequently the accused is an illiterate person, and makes a statement under section 342 criminal p. c, which is obviously untrue. very frequently he is not prepared to admit anything, whereas, if he was wise, he would admit facts ..... the dicta of the learned judge. in 'in re venkataswami : air1950mad309 , dealing with the presumption under section 114, of evidence act, it was observed that the explained possession of a jewel of a murdered person will be evidence under section 114 not only regarding theft but also regarding the murder itseii' if the possession could not rea- . .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 14 1960 (HC)

Madanlal Mathurdas Vs. Chunilal, Income-tax Officer, Ward 'C'

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1960Guj27; (1960)GLR38; [1962]44ITR325(Guj)

..... , madhya saurashtra circle. rajkot. the state of saurashtra became a part of the state of bombay after the constitution came into operation on 26-1-1950. the indian finance act, 1950 was enacted by the central parliament and received assent of the president on 31-3-1950. it is not now disputed before us that the present case is ..... this petition and the question relates to the interpretation of the provisions imposing time-limit for issuance of a notice under s. 34 of the income-tax act. a notice under that section was served on the petitioner on 2-4-1938 intimating that his income for assessment year 1949-50 had escaped assessment and the competence of the income ..... court relied on by mr. shah. it is also true that as far as possible the same expression should receive the same interpretation in the other parts of the same section. but the court in that case was considering the expression 'issue' as used in s. 34(3) and in a different context and different collocation and that decision, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 1960 (HC)

Kanbi Kurji Duba Vs. State

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1960Guj1; 1960CriLJ1200

..... in son facto, is exempted from criminal responsibility. such exemption isolated only where the insane person is incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong or contrary tallow. section 84 lays down the legal test of responsibility in cases of alleged unsoundness off mind, and it is by that test, as distinguished from ..... down by the house of lords in daniel mc naughton's case, (1943) 10 cl and fin 200. section 84 thus provides that a man who is, by reason his own conduct ..... the medical test, that the criminality of an act is to be determined. the provisions of s.84 are in substance theme as toes laid .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 1960 (HC)

Bhatt Shantilal Nathji and ors. Vs. Dave Gajanand Ranchhod and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1961Guj115; (1961)GLR467; (1961)0GLR471

..... so doing, he can more fully exercise and enjoy the1 object or carry out the purpose for which the easement was granted'. this seems to be consistent with section 21 of the indian easements act. 'i think that the right of way which was granted by the award was a general right of way, and cannot be fettered by implied restrictions, and ..... of the privy council in jadulal mullick v. gopalchandra mu-kerji, ilr 13 cal 136. in that case their lordships took into account that the bengal legislature had passed an act for the more efficient municipal government of calcutta and bye-laws were made to regulate the removal of refuse. it was provided that the servants of the municipality were to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1960 (HC)

State Vs. Sevamal Pevamal

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1961)2GLR242

..... on 8th july 1959 notwithstanding his conviction for the offence of setting up the same cannot be said to be barred by limitation under the proviso to section 200(1) of the act. mr. nanavati however relied upon a decision of the bombay high court reported in emperor v. bechardas xxxii bombay law reporter 768 where broomfield j ..... offence charged was that the respondent had continued the encroachment or projection on 8th july 1959 the period of six months prescribed under the proviso to section 200(1) of the act should be computed from the date of first conviction of the respondent for the offence of setting up the encroachment or projection and not from ..... continuing the wooden plank. the respondent also contended that in any event the complaint was barred by reason of the provision contained in the proviso to section 200(1) of the act.2. the prosecution led the evidence of the encroachment inspector and one clerk in the surat municipality called s.v. karve who had accompanied the encroachment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1961 (HC)

Hariprasad Jayantilal and Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, Ahmedabad

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1961)GLR487; [1962]45ITR294(Guj)

..... stood at all relevant time for the purpose of the present petition, were introduced in section 35 by the finance act, 1956. it is of some importance and cogency to note that it was by the same finance act of 1956 that the definition of 'dividend' in section 2(6a) with which we are concerned was substituted. the proviso to sub-clause ..... and which have bearing on the examination of the contention raised on behalf of the petitioner. prior to its amendment by the finance act, 1955, clause (6a) of section 2 was, in certain respect, differently worded. to sub-clause (c) relating to distribution made to shareholders of a company on the liquidation to the ..... changes and modifications which were made in respect of section 35(10) with which we are concerned. sub-section (10) was substituted by the finance act of 1956 with effect from april 1, 1956. incidentally, it may be mentioned that sub-section (10) was deleted by clause (2) of section 30 of the finance act of 1959. in the course of the argument .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1961 (HC)

The State Vs. Jethalal Ghelabhai Patel

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1962Guj208; [1962(4)FLR498]; (1961)GLR705; (1964)0GLR470; (1962)IILLJ342Guj

..... against their own folly or carelessness. the absolute nature of such an obligation on the occupier or the manager of a factory is also found in a corresponding section, section 14, of the english factories act. in davies v. thomas owen and co. ltd., (1919) 2 k. b. 39, this aspect of the obligation was emphasised by holding that ..... in halsbury's laws of england, third edition, vol. 17, page 74, where the propositions laid down in some of the leading cases on the corresponding section in the english factories act have been succinctly summarised. it is there stated that every dangerous part of a machinery in a factory, other than prime movers or transmission machinery, must ..... since it was in motion when the workman went there to grease it and the accident occurred, the employer was liable unless he took resort to section 101 of the act. as we have observed, under section 101 the employer has to prove, (a) that he was duly diligent; (b) that a particular person committed the mischief; and (c) .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //