Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 section 9 amendment of section 80k Court: delhi Page 2 of about 3,509 results (0.880 seconds)

Jan 05 2006 (TRI)

Commr. of C. Ex. Vs. Daya Engineering Works (Sleeper)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)(111)ECC227

..... availed the services of goods transport operators and were liable to pay the service tax), one more chance to file st-3 return. it was also argued that section 117 of finance act gives retrospective effect to the said sub-clause of service tax rules so as to re validate the levy and collection of service tax on the services rendered by ..... the goods transport operator from the users of such services.3. i find that section 117 of the finance act, 2000 validated the action taken by the department against the receiver of the services from the goods transport operator. however, demand for value of taxable service escaping ..... not yet attained the finality as they have filed appeal before the hon'ble supreme court against the said decision of the tribunal. it is also argued that section 117 of the finance act revalidates the provisions of sub-clause (xvii) of clause (d) of sub-rule (1) of rule 2 of service tax rules, 1994 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2003 (TRI)

Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2003)(158)ELT734TriDel

..... interest as demanded in the impugned orders.5. the issue to be decided falls under a narrow compass. we have perused the provisions of section 112 of the finance act, 2000, where sub-section (b) of section 112(2) categorically states as under :- "recovery shall be made of all the credit of duty, which have been taken or utilised ..... notice is issued and the same is adjudicated to quantify the amount of credit of duty, the recovery proceedings cannot commence under the said sub-section (2) (b) of section 112 of the finance act, 2000. it is pleaded that, recovery refers to collection only. no collection can be possible unless there is an assessment and the assessment ..... them and recovery of appropriate interest was also ordered. the said recovery was ordered in terms of provisions contained in section 112(2) of the finance act, 2000. the said section 112(2) was incorporated in the finance act to validate the denial of credit of duty paid on high speed diesel oil and also to disallow such credit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2014 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Heartland Delhi Transcription Services ...

Court : Delhi

..... april, 2003, the aforesaid prohibition or bar was no longer applicable and ceased to operate. when we examine sub-section (9a), which was inserted by the finance act, 2002 and omitted after one year by the finance act, 2003 with effect from 1st april, 2004, it would indicate that the legislature had noticed the ill effect of ..... clarified that cases of change in shareholding pattern in the case of public limited companies will also not affect the deduction. 19.9 the finance act, 2002 has introduced sub-section (9a) to provide that in case of genuine reorganization of business whereby a proprietary concern or a partnership is succeeded by a company, the ..... undertaking. 25. however, as noted above, in the very next year substantial changes were made by finance act 2003, sub-sections (9) and 9a of section 10b were both deleted. similar changes were also made in section 10a of the act. noticing the different views and interpretations being taken, cbdt has issued circular no.01/2013 dated 17th .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 1993 (TRI)

Jindal Strips Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (1993)47ITD349(Delhi)

..... will have to be excluded from the amount of income-tax payable by the company in respect of its total income). the annual finance act concerned here is the finance act, 1984. this finance act did not levy any tax on the distribution of dividends. therefore, the question of any income-tax payable on the distribution of dividends ..... by it. the explanation says that the expression "the relevant amount of distributions of dividends" means the meaning assigned to it in the finance act of the relevant year. now in the finance act of 1984, the expression 'relevant amount of distributions of dividends' has not come up for any particular consideration. that apart what is ..... vii) of rule 1 included in the total income; (b) the amount of income-tax, if any, payable by the company under the provisions of the annual finance act, with reference to the relevant amount of distributions of dividends by it. explanation: in this sub-clause, the expression 'the relevant amount of distributions of dividends' has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Samtech Industries and Others Vs. C.C.E. Kanpur and and Others

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... have been incurred by the service provider as pure agents of the service recipient. however, this rule has been struck down as ultra vires the provisions of section 66 and section 67 of the finance act, 1994 by honble delhi court in the case of intercontinental consultants and technocrafts pvt. vs. union of india and others ltd. reported in 2012 tiol-966- ..... str-608 pleaded that the contracts of the appellant with their customers were for repair of transformers, that when repair and maintenance service is taxable and in term of section 67 of the finance act, 1994, service tax is chargeable on the gross amount charged, value of the goods used for providing service would have to be included in the assessable value of ..... m/s.paramax electronics pvt. ltd. 16/comm./noida/2012-13, dt. 27.7.12, passed by cce, noida 1,32,62,762/- along with interest u/s 75 of finance act, 1994 1,32,62,762/ u/s 78 ibid. 3. m/s. mahendra engineering ltd. 23/comm./lko/st/2011-12,dt. 28.11.11, passed by cce, lucknow .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2002 (TRI)

Markfed Oil and Allied Industries Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2002)(84)ECC860

..... notice. as such the learned advocate has rightly submitted that there was no proposal for payment of service tax, which was not paid by them. section 84 of the finance act, 1994 empowers the commissioner to call for the record of the proceedings which has been taken by the assistant commissioner/deputy commissioner and makes such ..... payable will be known to the department only after the person responsible to pay the service tax files the quarterly returns as required under provisions of section 70 of the finance act, 1994; that unless and until the return is filed, there is nothing available with the department to verify the services rendered on which the ..... not arise.the learned advocate, therefore, contended that the commissioner cannot direct them to pay the service tax and interest thereto in exercise of powers under section 84 of the finance act, 1994.3. countering the arguments, shri atul dixit, learned sdr, submitted that a perusal of the show cause notice dated 12-5-99 would clearly .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2003 (TRI)

Shree Shyam Filaments Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2004)(176)ELT512TriDel

..... no force in the contention that the matters are pending in rajasthan high court supreme court as the appellants themselves have not challenged the validity of the said section of the finance act, 2000 in any high court of supreme court not there any appeal filed by them is pending in supreme court. they have also not brought on record ..... to 12.5.2000. similar view have been held by the tribunal in the case of cce v. mysore cement ltd. 2002 (147) elt 3522 (tri). section 112 of the finance act, 2000 clearly provides that notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment, decree or order of court, tribunal or other authority, no credit of any duty paid on high ..... their memorandum of appeal that they had taken the credit of duty paid on hsd oil under rule 57 b of the central excise rules, 1944; that section 112 of the finance act, 2000 provided that credit is not admissible in respect of hsd oil with retrospective effect; that the validity of the provisions of disallowing the modvat credit with .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2001 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Continental Device India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [2001]252ITR227(Delhi); [2001]118TAXMAN585(Delhi)

..... or more installments.' 6. a bare reading of the provisions makes it clear that the deposit in lieu of payment of surcharge on income-tax under sub-section (6) of section 2 of the finance act is to be made by a company or the assessed at any time before the last installment of advance tax is due in its case and under subsection ..... any time before the last installment of advance tax is due in its case.(2) a deposit in lieu of payment of surcharge on income-tax under sub-section (8) of section 2 of the finance act, 1976 (66 of 1976), may be made by a company at any time during the financial year commencing on the 1st day of april, 1976.(3) a ..... with the industrial development bank of india (in short 'the i.d.b.i.') in lieu of the surcharge on income-tax in terms of section 2(6) and (8) of the finance act, 1976 (in short 'the finance act') read with the companies deposits (surcharge on income-tax) scheme, 1976 (in short 'the scheme'), dated august 28, 1976. the assessed made the deposit on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2000 (HC)

Charak Pharmaceuticals (i) Ltd Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)363; 2000(52)DRJ544; 2000(67)ECC749

..... of provisional assessments, made prior to 31st march, 1998 and remained unpaid and was, thus, 'tax arrear' within the meaning of section 87(m)(ii) of the finance (no. 2) act, 1998 (for short `the finance act'). 7. the petitioner filed an appeal against the order, dated 17th september, 1998, which is stated to be pending. however, in ..... demand notice or show cause notice issued on or before 31st march, 1998 but remaining unpaid on the date of making declaration under the scheme. section 95(ii) of the finance act also places an embargo in respect of certain items of tax arrear and excludes the following type of cases from the scope of the scheme: ..... thereforee, of the considered view that the amount of differen- tial duty of rs.19,29,642/- was 'tax arrear' within the meaning of section 87(m)(ii)(b) of the finance act and the petitioner having fulfillled all other requisite conditions, the designated authority was not justified in directing the return of declaration on the aforestated ground. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2012 (TRI)

M/S South Eastern Coalfields Ltd Vs. Cce, Raipur

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... 2. subsequently a corrigendum to the notice was issued on 02-11-2004 pointing out the retrospective amendment made in finance act, 1994 by finance act 2003 and the prospective amendment in section 73 of finance act 1994 made by finance act 2004. finally the notice was adjudicated confirming demand of service tax amounting to rs. 1466.73 lakhs with interest and ..... . now the question arose whether this amendment was good enough to issue demands under section 73 of finance act, 1994 on persons who had not paid tax during the said period a per rule 2 (d) (xvii). the dispute raised was that during the ..... 5. to overcome the defect pointed out by the apex court in the case of laghu bharati udyog (supra), the parliament made retrospective amendment by section 117 of the finance act, 2000. this amendment validated the action taken under the said rule not withstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court, tribunal or any authority .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //