Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 section 38 amendment of act 1 of 1944 Court: uk supreme court Page 10 of about 1,901 results (0.231 seconds)

Nov 03 2010 (FN)

Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Company (Appellant) Vs. the Min ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... which tantamounts to a repudiation of the whole agreement which repudiation is hereby accepted. moreover, the effectiveness of the agreement was conditional upon your arranging the requisite financing facility amounting to u.s. $100,000,000.00 within thirty (30) days of the execution of the agreement and your failure to do so ..... to be given to the company by the government and egoth, and the claimants were to be responsible for engineering, construction and architectural services, as well as financing. subsequently, egoth and the claimants entered into a "supplemental agreement" which defined the project and their obligations and contained an icc arbitration clause. underneath their ..... j's phrase in in the estate of fuld, decd (no 3) [1968] p 675, 698), for example where it is discriminatory or arbitrary. the application of public policy in the new york convention (article v(2)(b)) and the 1996 act (section 103(3)) is limited to the non-recognition or enforcement of foreign awards. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2014 (FN)

R Vs. Mackle

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... a) of any duty chargeable on the goods; he shall be guilty of an offence under this section and may be detained." 28. excise duty on tobacco is payable by virtue of section 2(1) of the tobacco products duty act 1979 (as amended by finance act 1981, sch 19, pt iii) which provides that tobacco products imported into or manufactured in the ..... at an "excise duty point". section 1(1) of the finance (no 2) act ..... united kingdom are subject to a duty of excise at the rates shown in a table in schedule 1 to the act. such duty becomes payable .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 12 2010 (FN)

Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd, R (on the application of) Vs. Wolverhamp ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... not the land in respect of which the application for permission related, but they could properly be regarded (for the purposes of the town and country planning act 1947, section 14) as "expedient in connection with" the permitted development. lord denning said (at 574): "it would be very different if the minister sought to ..... financial dependency of part of a composite development on another part may be a relevant consideration, in the sense that the fact that the proposed development will finance other relevant planning benefits may be material. fourth, off-site benefits which are related to or are connected with the development will be material. these ..... development plan. the planning authority granted permission for the whole proposed development on the basis that the desirable improvements to the opera house could not be financed unless the offices were permitted. the applicants sought judicial review of that decision on the ground, inter alia, that the fact that a desirable part .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 06 2011 (FN)

Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another (R ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... " includes under section 34(2)(a) "keeping what one has"). however, if a planning authority were to discover an unauthorised ..... within the literal language of the sections. it is true that the council would then be able to show that a criminal offence had been committed (in the case of a bribe under the public bodies corrupt practices act 1889, section 1 and in the case of menaces probably under the theft act 1968, section 21, since the purpose of "gain ..... of his deceit he omitted to register any member of the household for the payment of council tax for the period 2002-2006, contrary to section 6 of the local government finance act 1992, and he failed to comply with a number of the requirements of the building regulations (si 2000/2531) with regard to the construction of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2013 (FN)

Daejan Investments Limited Vs. Benson and Others

Court : UK Supreme Court

..... for consultation runs counter to the above suggestion. what i have described as the basic jurisdiction, now exercised under sections 19 and 27a of the 1985 act, originated in section 124(1) of the housing act 1974 through its insertion of section 91a into the housing finance act 1972. the jurisdiction was then conferred only on the high court or the county court; it applied only to ..... flats and to certain types of tenancy; but otherwise it was described in terminology quite similar to the present (section 91a(3)). it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 1909 (FN)

Reavis Vs. Fianza

Court : US Supreme Court

..... that his father showed to him. it is said that the claim is larger than is allowed by 22. but the limitation of that section applies only to claims "located after the passage of this act." it is to be assumed, then, that the appellees and their ancestors page 215 u. s. 24 had held possession and had worked ..... fifty years, and probably for many more, fianza and his ancestors have held possession of these mines. he now claims title under the philippine act of july 1, 1902, c. 1369, 45, 32 stat. 691. this section reads as follows: "that where such person or association, they and their grantors, have held and worked their claims for a period equal ..... must be maintained. otherwise, in view of the spanish and american law before july 1, 1902, no rights could be acquired, and the section would be empty words, whereas, as we have said before, another section of the act, 16, still further shows the intention of congress to respect native occupation of public lands. again, it is urged that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2003 (FN)

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court : US Supreme Court

..... who fund electioneering communications. bcra s use of this new term is not, however, limited to the disclosure context: a later section of the act (bcra 203, which amends feca 316(b)(2)) restricts corporations and labor unions funding of electioneering communications. plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality ..... justifies that burden. id., at 657. the latter question whether the state interest is compelling is easily answered by our prior decisions regarding campaign finance regulation, which represent respect for the legislative judgment that the special characteristics of the corporate structure require particularly careful regulation. beaumont , supra , at ..... feca s longstanding definition of coordination delineates its reach in words of common understanding. cameron v. johnson, 390 u. s. 611 , 616 (1968). not surprisingly, therefore, the relevant statutory language has survived without constitutional challenge for almost three decades. although that fact does not insulate the definition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 2004 (FN)

Department of Transportation Vs. Public Citizen

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the application rule. in december 2001, congress enacted the department of transportation and related agencies appropriations act, 2002, 115 stat. 833. section 350 of this act, id., at 864, provided that no funds appropriated under the act could be obligated or expended to review or to process any application by a mexican motor carrier ..... by fmcsa in the application and safety monitoring rules. congress extended the 350 conditions to appropriations for fiscal years 2003 and 2004. in january 2002, acting pursuant to nepa s mandates, fmcsa issued a programmatic ea for the proposed application and safety monitoring rules. fmcsa s ea evaluated the environmental impact ..... , over these emissions. as discussed above, fmcsa does not have the ability to countermand the president s decision to lift the moratorium, nor could it act categorically to prevent mexican carriers from being registered or mexican trucks from entering the united states. once the regulations are promulgated, fmcsa would have no .....

Tag this Judgment!

1846

Mackay Vs. Dillon

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the inhabitants of st. louis filed their notice of claim, plat, and evidences in 1806, asking to have the town common confirmed to them. by the first section of the act of 1812 (june 13th), congress confirmed the claim to commons adjoining and belonging to st. louis, with similar claims made by other towns. but no extent or ..... for louisiana (now missouri and arkansas) sat at st. louis, as at that place the recorder's office was established and is yet kept. by the fourth section of the act, all those asserting claims to land founded on concessions or other assumptions of right to obtain titles from the united states, and which claims originated with the french ..... town or village lots, outlots, common field lots, and commons in, adjoining, and belonging to the said towns or villages, confirmed to them respectively by the first section of the act of congress, entitled &c.;, passed on 13 june, 1812." in the course of the trial, a transcript of a record and deed were offered in evidence on .....

Tag this Judgment!

1876

Eyster Vs. Centennial Board of Finance

Court : US Supreme Court

..... in the distribution of any moneys that may remain in the treasury of the centennial board of finance after the payment of its debts, as provided for by the tenth section of the act of congress approved june 1, 1872, incorporating the centennial board of finance, the appropriation hereinbefore made shall be paid in full into the treasury of the united states ..... of the united states for the eastern district of pennsylvania syllabus in the distribution of the moneys remaining in the treasury of the centennial board of finance at the close of that corporation, as provided for in sec. 10 of the act of congress of june 1, 1872, 17 stat. 203, the appropriation of $1,500,000, made by the ..... the distribution of the moneys remaining in the treasury of the centennial board of finance at the close of the affairs of that corporation, as provided for in sec. 10 of the act of june 1, 1872, the appropriation of $1,500,000 made by congress in the act of feb. 16, 1876, must be paid into the treasury of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //