Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 section 28 amendment of section 280zb Sorted by: old Court: mumbai Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 18 results (2.049 seconds)

BenjamIn Doming Cardoza Vs. Mrs. Gladys BenjamIn Cardoza

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1997Bom175; 1997(3)BomCR553; (1997)2BOMLR94; II(1997)DMC460; 1997(1)MhLj536

..... we allow this petition and pass a decree of nullity of the marriage of the petitioner-husband with the respondent-wife solemnised on 3-4-1983 under section 19 of the indian divorce act, 1869. there shall be no order as to costs. office is directed to expedite the drawing of the decree. petitioner is also directed to provide ..... to the aforesaid marriage was obtained by suppression vari, he, the petitioner is entitled to get a decree of nullity of his marriage with the respondent under section 19 of the indian divorce act, 1869. 3. it appears that on the date on which the aforesaid petition was filed before the learned district judge, thane, the said petition was ..... , thane, for a declaration that the marriage solemnised between the petitioner-husband and the respondent, his wife on 3-4-1983, is a nullity under section 19 of the indian divorce act, 1869. it was stated in the said petition that the marriage of the petitioner and the respondent was solemnised as per the christian rites on 3- .....

Shri Anand Patwardhan Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998(1)ALLMR312; 1997(3)BomCR438

..... to set out not only their recommendations but also the reasons therefor in cases where there is difference of opinion amongst the members of the committee. section 5-a of the act provides that if after examining a film or having it examined in the prescribed manner, the board considers that the film is suitable for unrestricted public ..... by article 19(1)(a). it was observed that our constitution recognises the need to place reasonable restrictions on grounds specified by art. 19(2) and section 5-b of the act on the exercise of the right of speech and expression. it is for this reason that the need for prior restraint is recognised and our laws ..... to enforce the petitioner's fundamental right under articles 21 and 25 of the constitution and declaring the screening or televising of 'tamas' as violative of section 5-b of the cinematograph act, 1952. one javed ahmed siddique also filed a writ petition in this court praying for similar reliefs. the learned single judge of this court while .....

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. New Jack Printing Works Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)(93)ELT78Tri(Mum.)bai

..... is already covered with aluminium foil and should it be classified under sub-heading 4812.12 or 4818.13 or 4818.90 or 4901.90 of the central excise tariff act.7. the assistant commissioner in his order has mentioned about the product. we wish to extract the same for elucidation. "the wrapper manufactured by the party is meant ..... were classified by the assistant commissioner under subheading 4818.90 and some were classified under sub-heading 4901.90 of the central excise tariff act. the respondent filed on appeal before the commissioner of the central excise (appeals) bombay who by the impugned order had held that the item in question in the ..... collector by order 66/87, dated 10-8-1987 held that the product in question was on item coming under sub-heading 4818.90 of the central excise tariff act, and assessed to duty at the rate of 12% and not under sub-heading 4901.90. incidentally there were other products manufactured by the respondent some of which .....

Rafiq Abdul Karim Merchant Vs. Rajendra Singh, Secretary to Govt. of M ...

Court : Mumbai

..... lakhs through zainab khan. para 12 shows that the detenue used to regularly purchase tickets through max travels and this is borne out from the statement recorded under section 108 of the customs act of maqsood abdul wahid kudia, partner of the said firm. a perusal of the grounds of detention unequivocally shows that an organized, and well planned manner, by ..... of union of india. this ground has been replied to in two returns. the first sworn by mr. m. s. negi, under secretary to the government of india, ministry of finance, department of revenue, new delhi and the second by s. c. bhagure, jailor, group ii, nasik road central prison, nasik. in order to adjudicate upon the said ground ..... authority. (x) on 9-4-1997 comments were submitted by the sponsoring authority. (xi) on 17-4-1997 comments submitted on 9-4-1997 were received by ministry of finance. (xii) 18-4-1997, 19-4-1997 and 20-4-1997 were holidays. (xiii) on 22-4-1997 the comments were processed by the under secretary and submitted to .....

Suresh Vadilal Vyas Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR488

..... on 1st february, 1984 by shri k.s. dilipsinghji, additional secretary to the government of india, ministry of finance, in exercise of the powers conferred on him by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the cofeposa act. the representation was made by the detenu on february 29, 1984. papers were put up before another detaining authority ..... an officer of the state government specially empowered for that purpose. the argument is that shri verma was an officer specially empowered under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the cofeposa act and he was the detaining authority, who has passed the order of detention. the representation dated 4th march, 1996 was admittedly made to ..... in smt. santosh anand v. union of india and others, : (1981)2scc420 . it was held that under article 22(5), as also under section 11 of the cofeposa act the representation should be considered by the detaining authority, who on consideration thereof, can revoke the detention order. if the representation is rejected by the detaining .....

Gallotti Raoul Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)61ITD453(Mum.)

..... court decision in cit v. south arcoi district co-operative supply & marketing society ltd. [1981] 127 itr 467 and submitted that here also the co-operative societies act provided for contribution of a portion of the profits to the education fund and the court ruled that such contribution was nothing but application of income. mr. modi submitted ..... sakkare karkhane ltd. [1988] 174 itr 475 considered the contributions made by a co-operative society to an education fund under the provisions of karnataka co-operative societies act and had concluded that such contribution was diversion by overriding title. a similar view was taken by the madhya pradesh high court in keshkal co-operative marketing society ltd. ..... a prior charge by overriding title and it is only the net salary after such deduction that should be treated as gross salary within the meaning of section 16 of the i.t. act. we accordingly direct the assessing officer to assess the salary income on the basis of our directions as above. .....

Raghvendra Anantrai Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR213

..... officer of a tribunal or an appellate tribunal, shall be such as may be prescribed. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 13 read with clause (a) of sub-section (2) of section 36 of the act, the central government has framed the rules of 1993. they are notified in part ii of the gazette of india, extraordinary on ..... claimed h.o.r. facilities by writing letters to the concerned authorities. by letter dated 7th april, 1995 the under secretary to the government of india, ministry of finance, department of economic affairs (banking division) informed the under secretary (h.o.r.), ministry of railway in respect of the request of the petitioner about h.o.r ..... to be a judge of a high court or (b) ....(c) ....' initially appointment was upto the age of 62 but on amendment to the act, the retirement age is now raised to 65. section 13 provides that the salary and allowances payable to, and other terms and conditions of service (including pension, gratuity and other retirement benefits) of, .....

Maharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. Arvind Purushottam Joshi

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1997Bom160; 1997(3)BomCR413; (1997)2BOMLR40; 1997(2)MhLj59

..... first appellate court and submitted that 'commercial establishment' and or `general motive power' are not defined in the tariff issued under the electricity(supply) act, 1948. he would submit that if these expressions have not been defined in the tariff, by taking external help and relying on the definition of ..... however, relies upon the meaning assigned to the word 'industry' in the industrial disputes act, 1947 in spport of its case. the expression 'industry' is no doubt given a very wide definition in section 2(j) of the industrial disputes act, 1947. it reads thus:'29(j) 'industry' means any business, trade, undertaking, ..... manufacture or calling of employers and includes any calling, service, employment, handicraft, or industrial occupation avocation of workmen.the above definition is given in the context of the subject matter with which the industrial disputes act .....

Anand Swaroop Ram Kumar Gupta Vs. the Union of India Through the Secre ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1998BomCR(Cri)321

..... present case, the detenu was not deprived of the right of making representation to the detaining authority under article 22(5) of the constitution read with section 8(1) of the act. although the detenu had no right to simultaneously make a representation against the order of detention to the central government under article 22(5) and there was ..... 13-5-96 and submitted to minister of state (revenue & expenditure). minister of state (revenue & expenditure) was also on tour. the file was submitted directly to finance minister who finally rejected the representation on 14-5-96. a memo intimating the detenu about rejection of his representation was also issued on 17-5-96. thus both the ..... . the secretary, revenue cleared the file on 13th may 1996 and submitted to the minister of state who was on tour. it was then submitted to the finance minister who finally rejected the second representation on 14th may 1996 and the memo intimating the rejection was issued to the detenu on 17th may 1996. it is .....

Goodlass Nerolac Paints Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1998)(99)ELT248Tri(Mum.)bai

..... coercive action by the department therefore, it should be treated as protest and he cites the decision of the madras high court in the case of the secretary, ministry of finance v. m/s. prabhakar match industries - 1984 (15) e.l.t. 316 (mad.) wherein para 17 of the judgment of the ld.single judge madras high court held as follows ..... commissioner (appeals), mumbai-i.2. the appellants are a limited company engaged in the manufacture of paints & varnishes falling under chapter 32 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act, [1985]. they had taken modvat credit of rs. 24,336/- on the strength of endorsed certificate. by order dated 11-5-1988 the assistant collector rejected the said credit and .....