Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 section 28 amendment of section 280zb Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 764 results (0.093 seconds)

Jan 14 2000 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Bengal-i, Calcutta Vs. M/S. M.N. Dastur and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2000)2CALLT394(HC)

..... 1.4.72 and also amended by finance act 1974 but made effective from 1.4.1972. by ..... notice, specially after insertion of section 80ab in the act.24. for deduction of tax on royalties, etc., received from certain foreign companies were initially allowed under section 85c of the act. the provision of that section was substituted by section 80-o in the year 1968 and that section 80-ois further amendment by finance act 1971 w.e.f. ..... earn the income?'4. since basic common issue does arise in both the reference applications, whether the assessee is entitled for deduction, under section 80-o of the act on gross amount of convertible foreign exchange brought into india, without taking into account the expenses direct or indirect incurred in india.5. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2004 (TRI)

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Poddar Projects Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2005)92ITD468(Kol.)

..... 's income under the head "income from house property". the assessee's this claim was rejected by the a.o. in view of the amended provisions of section 32(2) amended by the finance act, 1996 by observing and saying that the unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to the assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97 cannot be set off against income under any head ..... . the new sub-section (2) of section 32 as substituted by the finance act, 2001 w.e.f. 1.4.2002 has restored the sub-section (2) of section 32 as it stood in the assessment year 1996-97, in other words, the restrictions imposed by the ..... (2(iii) as substituted w.e.f. 1.4.97. in this context, it may be observed that amended section 32(2) as substituted by the finance (no. 2) act, 1996 (w.e.f. 1.4.1997) has been substituted by the finance act, 2001, w.e.f. 1.4.2002 and status quo ante has been restored with effect from a.y. 2002-2003 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1985 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Calcutta Steel Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1985)48CTR(Cal)146,[1985]153ITR488(Cal)

..... may be that there being no export and profits in respect of import entitlements, the assessee was not entitled to deduction of tax as contemplated under section 2(5)(a)(i) of the finance act, 1965. in this case also, two views are conceivable as regards the interpretation of the expression 'sale proceeds' or 'turnover'. one view is ..... to 'referable to exports.'.10. the gujarat high court in the case of ahmedabad . v. cit : [1982]137itr616(guj) , construed the provisions of section 2(5)(a) of the finance act, 1964, regarding the profits derived from exports and held that cash subsidy or allowance given on export of goods is directly connected with the export of goods ..... v. wheel and rim company of india ltd. : [1977]107itr168(mad) , the question before the madras high court was whether under the provisions of section 2(5)(a) of the finance act, 1966, the cash subsidy and the income derived from the sale of import entitlements would form part of the profits and gains derived from the export .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1988 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Indian Molasses Co. (P.) Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1989)77CTR(Cal)112,[1989]176ITR473(Cal)

..... clause (c). by the said finance act, section 40(a)(v) was inserted with effect from 1st april, 1969. section 40(a)(v), as introduced by the finance act of 1968, is as follows :'(a) in the case of any assessee ... (v) any expenditure which results directly or ..... salaries' is seven thousand five hundred rupees or less.'10. minor changes were also introduced in the first proviso to section 40(c)(iii) which are not relevant.11. by the finance act of 1968, sub-clause (iii) of section 40(c) and explanation 2 thereof stood omitted with effect from april 1, 1969, and explanation 1 remains attached to ..... the contentions of the parties, it is necessary for us to set outthe legislative history of section 40(c), section 40(a)(v) and section 40a(5).6. section 40(c)(iii) was introduced by section 6 of the finance act,1963, with effect from april 1, 1963. section 40(c) as it stood after the insertion of clause (iii) is as follows .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1980 (HC)

Ramanlal Madanlal Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1980]46STC35(Cal)

..... the purpose of assessment or reassessment of sales tax for the period in question. it is further contended that declarations made under the provisions of section 68 of the finance act, 1965, and the proceedings thereunder are confidential and no public servant including the commissioner of income-tax before whom the declaration might be made would ..... income so disclosed related to a period prior to 1961. the disclosures were duly accepted by the commissioner of income-tax and a certificate under section 68(7) of the finance act, 1965, has been given to the partners and taxes on such disclosures have been paid.14. the petitioner contends that the said notice dated ..... on 31st may, 1965, the partners of the petitioner made voluntary disclosure of their undisclosed income which they had earned in their individual capacity under section 68 of the finance act, 1965. the petitioner's case is that the particulars of the amounts disclosed were not available and that the said amounts had been earned .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 1967 (HC)

Shri Anil Kumar Dutta and ors. Vs. Additional Member, Board of Revenue

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1967]20STC528(Cal)

..... and vital defects in the declaration in form xxiv furnished to justify disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941, in respect of sales of rs. 11,937-2-0 made to messrs rabindra & company ;(ix) whether there are admissible ..... and vital defects in the declaration in form xxiv furnished to justify disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941, in respect of sales of rs. 11,195-3-0 made to messrs lakhi stores;(viii) whether there are admissible evidence ..... vi) whether there are admissible evidence and vital defects in the declaration in form xxiv furnished to justify disallowance of the deduction claimed under section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941, in respect of sales of rs. 6,391-12-0 made to messrs biswanath choudhury;(vii) whether there are admissible evidence .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 1969 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Deoria Sugar Mills Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1971]80ITR408(Cal)

..... is chargeable to tax independent of the passing of the finance act but until the finance act is passed no tax can be actually levied.'15. the close connection between the income-tax act and finance act is further evident from the provisions of section 294 of the income-tax act of 1961 corresponding to section 67b of the act of 1922. section 294 runs thus :'if on the 1st day of ..... same view in commissioner of wealth-tax v. jhagrakhand collieries (private) ltd., [1968] 67 i.t.r. 572 (cal.) 12. we have now to discuss the appellate tribunal's powers to question the vires of the annual finance act. dealing with the position of the finance acts in relation to the income-tax act, the privy council in maharajah of pilhapuram v. commissioner of income-tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2004 (TRI)

Jagatdal Jute and Industries Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in : (2004)1SOT210(Kol.)

..... paid before due date for furnishing the return of income for the year, is unsustainable in law particularly in view of amendments, introduced by finance act, 2003 in section 43b of income tax act, 1961, which are to be treated as having retrospective effect covering the year under consideration in view of principles laid down by honble supreme ..... decisions of the aforesaid coordinate benches, we are, therefore, of the considered opinion that the amendment brought by the finance act, 2003 in the 1st proviso to section 43b of the act and consequential omission of 2nd proviso to section 43b is to be treated as retrospective in operation, and consequently, any sum payable by the assessee as an ..... incurred and evidence of such payment is furnished by the assessee along with such return. on reading the 1st proviso to section 43b of the act, as it stood prior to the amendment made by the finance act, 2003, with effect from 1-4-2004, it is clear that this proviso was applicable only to the sums .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 24 1957 (HC)

inland Revenue Commissioners Vs. Pollock and Peel Ltd. (In Liquidation ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1958]34ITR379(Cal)

..... look upon the distribution of the pollock & peel no. 2 shares as being distributions at all for any relevant purpose.so much for the finance act, 1947; and i will now pass to section 31 of the finance act, 1951. again i must read a substantial part of the first and second subsections, and also make a reference to the definitions. [his ..... not, as i apprehend it, one of fact for the special commissioners, but one of law to be determined on the meaning of paragraph (c) of section 31(i) of the finance act, 1947.for the reasons which i have tried to state, i think this appeal fails, and should be dismissed.morris l. j. the question which arises ..... company constituted a distribution which was a 'gross relevant distribution within the meaning of section 35(1) of the finance act, 1947, while having regard to the provisions of section 31 of the finance act, 1951.it is said by the crown that the effect of section 31 of the finance act, 1951, as applied to the facts of this case is that an amount equal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1980 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Vs. Hindusthan Motors Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1981]127ITR210(Cal)

..... assessee should not be deprived of the same as we have mentioned in para. f of part i of the first schedule of the finance act, 1965, and similar is the position under section 80e of the i.t. act, 1961. column a provides the type of company. it does not require that the company must be exclusively or wholly or mainly involved in ..... , provides for deduction in the computation of the total income whereas para. f of the first schedule to the finance act, 1965, provided for rebate of tax at a certain percentage. the relief under section 80e of the i.t. act, 1961, was to be given in respect of the profits and gains of a priority industry, i.e., one engaged in the ..... rebate of tax at the higher rate of 35% under para. f of the first schedule to the finance act, 1965, for the assessment year 1965-66 and its claim for deduction in the computation of its total income under section 80e of the i.t. act. 1961, for the assessment year 1966-67, were dealt with by the tribunal. after setting out the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //