Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 section 2 income tax Sorted by: recent Court: punjab and haryana Page 7 of about 11,420 results (0.208 seconds)

Jul 15 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Jatinder Singla Advocate Vs. Avtar Singh ...Petitioner

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... cpc has been omitted and secondly there is a delay in filing the application. it is submitted that though order 18 rule 17a cpc has been deleted but by applying section 151 cpc, opportunity is being granted by this court and in this regard, he has relied upon a judgment of this court in the case of phuman singh and ..... of this document chandigarh cr no.6231 of 2012 [4].***** cannot be allowed to regulate the proceedings of the court at their whims and fancies. in order to appreciate the act and conduct of the petitioner, the application filed by him for the purpose of additional evidence has to be examined. in this application, all that has been said is ..... .in phuman singh's case (supra).this court has held that though order 18 rule 17-a cpc has been deleted but invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under section 151 cpc, the additional evidence can be allowed. similar view has been expressed in shahabad coop. sugar mills's case (supra).there is no difficulty insofar as invoking of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2014 (HC)

Shahid Khan Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... subhash godara, addl. advocate general, haryana for the respondent-state. **** inderjit singh, j. petitioner shahid khan has filed this petition against state of haryana respondent under section 401 cr.p.c.challenging the judgment dated 25.01.2014 passed by learned sessions judge, faridabad. it is mainly stated in the petition that the impugned judgment of ..... vineet gulati201408.06 09:28 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crr no.610 of 2014 -2- had left for going to city finance, sarai khawaja on his motorcycle. his cousin brother deepak was the pillion rider. at about 11.00 a.m., when they reached sohna road, a truck bearing ..... injury. it is further stated in the petition that chander sain is an interested witness. it is stated that learned appellate court bypassed the probation of offenders act while passing the sentence and did not consider the plea of petitioner for release on probation. at the time of preliminary hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 2014 (HC)

Commissioner of Central Excise Chandigarh-i Vs. M/S Sawan Mal Shibu Ma ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... provided for by virtue of section 132 of the finance act, 2001) shall be applicable in respect of obligation and liabilities incurred under rules ..... payment of duty?. iii. whether provisions of section 11a of the central excise act, 1944 regarding limitation shall apply to the compounded levy scheme, being a comprehensive scheme in itself with general provisions of central excise act and rules excluded?. iv. whether the provisions of section 38a of the central excise act, 1944 inserted by section 131 of the finance act, 2001 (validation of action taken has been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Manish JaIn Advocate Vs. the Authorized Officer, Uco Bank ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... liability within 60 days from the date of notice, failing which, the secured creditor would be entitled to exercise all or any of his right under section 13(4) of the sarfaesi act. under section 13(3), the notice had to contain the details of the amount payable by the borrower and the secured assets intended to be enforced by the ..... of the sale price in full and handed over the delivery and possession of the items listed below. description of the movable property plant & machinery along with medical equipments financed by the bank(in term of valuation report dated 19.03.2012) .39. the valuation report has not been placed on record to show the items which were sold ..... /s. iaa hospital pvt. ltd.- petitioner no.1 set up a hospital in ludhiana namely ludhiana mediciti (hereinafter referred to as 'the principal borrower'). in order to finance the project, the respondent-bank was approached for the purpose of the grant of sailesh ranjan 2014.07.23 18:02 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. J.S. Brar Advocate Vs. Superintending Canal Officer Sirhi ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... i have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that there is a clear cut violation of section 30-a of the act. no scheme was published nor the draft site plan was prepared. earlier arrangement had been going on for many years and those orders have become final. ..... cwp no.3583 of 2011 5 found that it would be for better irrigation. it was also submitted that warabandi has already been fixed and sanctioned under section 68 of the act regarding these outlets. respondent nos.3 to 28 in their written statement took the plea that the petitioner is only person aggrieved against the impugned orders. ..... finality. the area of the petitioner and his family members was being irrigated from outlet no.3190-r kotli minor, but due to political vendetta of the then finance minister, punjab, respondent nos.3 to 28 along with their family members moved an application for shifting the head of outlet no.3190-r kotli minor to 1625 ft .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2014 (HC)

Union of India and Others Vs. All India Postal Ed Employees Union (Pun ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... 10.10.2008 itself states that it is being issued consequent upon recent amendments to section 2 (13) and section 12 of the said act enhancing the calculation ceiling effective from 1.4.2006. we, thus, call upon the department of expenditure, ministry of finance, to clarify the aforesaid aspect arising from the office memorandum dated 10.10.2008 ..... or on the basis of production or productivity and for matters connected therewith. insofar as the aspect of ceiling limit is concerned, it is useful to reproduce section 12 of the act, which reads as under:- 12. calculation of bonus with respect to certain employees.- where the salary or wage of an employee exceeds three thousand and ..... and interpretation of the office memorandum dated 10.10.2008 of the ministry of finance which appears to be a consequence of the amendments carried out to the said act while increasing the civil writ petition no.13491 of 2009 10 ceiling under section 12 of that act from ` 2,500/- to ` 3,500/- per mensem. this is in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2014 (HC)

Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Anuradha Bhatnagar and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... or the designate judge has jurisdiction to consider the application made by the appellant for the appointment of an arbitrator under section 11. having regard to section 11(12)(b) and section 2(e) of the 1996 act read with section 20(c) of the code, there remains no doubt that the chief justice or the designate judge of the ..... effect and sought payment of the sums due and payable under the agreement within grace period of seven days thereof. respondent no.1 filed application under section 9 of the 1996 act before the court at chandigarh wherein the trial court passed an ex parte interim order restraining the appellant- company from appointing successor distributor for chandigarh and ..... forbidden by law nor it is against the public policy. it does not offend section 28 of the contract act in any manner.32. the above view finds support from the decisions of this court in hakam singh, a.b.c. laminart1, r.s.d.v. finance, angile insulations, shriram city, hanil era textiles and balaji coke.33. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2014 (HC)

“that the Applicant Is a Resident of Village Nalvi Ps Shahbad Markan ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... bail, in a case registered against him along with his other co-accused, vide fir no.325 dated 4.10.2013, on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 406, 498-a and 506 ipc by the police of police station shahabad, district kurukshetra.2. notice of the petition was issued to the respondents.3. after hearing the learned ..... in the shop and threatened that they have no relation with her you leave the chandigarh and go to your parents. the applicant told to her parents about the illegal act of accused persons where upon the family members of the applicant had gone to make the accused persons understand but they did not listen to the family members of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. P.K.Mutneja Advocate Vs. Rama Nand and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... such a motor accident and which proposition could not be controverted on behalf of the respondents. even as per the definition of owner laid down in section 20(30) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 goes to show that it means a person whose name a motor vehicle stands registered and, thus, a financier cannot be termed so, though ..... mr.s.k.yadav, advocate for respondents no.2 to 4. **** fateh deep singh, j. the short point which has led to this appeal by the appellant-financer of truck make tata407no.dl-1l/b2918(in short 'the offending truck') owned by sajjan singh and being driven by manjit singh which on fateful day of 22.06. ..... the registration certificate as the vehicle is under hire- purchase agreement cannot absolve them of such consequences. appreciating these submission, the hon'ble apex court in godavari finance company versus degala satyanarayanamma and others.(2008) 5 scc107has clearly settled the law that in case of a motor vehicle which is subjected to a hire-purchase agreement, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2014 (HC)

as Such Without Expressing Any Opinion on the Merits of the Vs. State ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... .p.c praying for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case f.i.r.no.318 dated 28.4.2012 under sections 148, 149, 302, 34 i.p.c and sections 25, 54, 59 of arms act, registered at police station, model town, panipat, district panipat. learned counsel for the parties have been heard. f.i.r in question was ..... f.i.r, wherein complainant zile singh had alleged that some unknown persons had murdered his son by firing shots on account of some money transactions with regard to the finance business of his son sardara singh. the petitioner has been implicated in the present case on the basis of an alleged extra judicial confession made by the petitioner himself before ..... singh, who was shot at by jasvir, sandeep @ kala son of lehna as also sandeep @ leela son of mahender. the issue with regard to an offence under section 302 i.p.c read with section 34 i.p.c having been made out against the present petitioner, would be a moot point to be considered during the cours.of trial. even the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //