Court : Karnataka
..... being one year; going by these contemporary standards of several states and of the central government, it cannot be gainsaid that the fine amount prescribed by sec. 6 of the impugned act, ranging between rs. 15 lakh & rs. 30 lakh is arbitrary, unreasonable or disproportionate; the problem of acute shortage of medical service to the rural ..... or parents of the students and it runs counter to section 14 of the parent act, which empowers the rule making authority to make rules to regulate educational institutions charging exorbitant capitation fee and to provide adequate seats for students of ..... that 2006 rules including the amended rule 11 are illegal, as they are beyond the legislative competence of the state government under sub-section (1) of section 14 of the capitation fee act, 1984. he would contend that rule 11 of the 2006 rules is erroneous, as it contemplates imposition of penalty on the students .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... being one year; going by these contemporary standards of several states and of the central government, it cannot be gainsaid that the fine amount prescribed by sec. 6 of the impugned act, ranging between rs. 15 lakh & rs. 30 lakh is arbitrary, unreasonable or disproportionate; the problem of acute shortage of medical service to the rural ..... or parents of the students and it runs counter to section 14 of the parent act, which empowers the rule making authority to make rules to regulate educational institutions charging exorbitant capitation fee and to provide adequate seats for students of ..... that 2006 rules including the amended rule 11 are illegal, as they are beyond the legislative competence of the state government under sub-section (1) of section 14 of the capitation fee act, 1984. he would contend that rule 11 of the 2006 rules is erroneous, as it contemplates imposition of penalty on the students .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... being one year; going by these contemporary standards of several states and of the central government, it cannot be gainsaid that the fine amount prescribed by sec. 6 of the impugned act, ranging between rs. 15 lakh & rs. 30 lakh is arbitrary, unreasonable or disproportionate; the problem of acute shortage of medical service to the rural ..... or parents of the students and it runs counter to section 14 of the parent act, which empowers the rule making authority to make rules to regulate educational institutions charging exorbitant capitation fee and to provide adequate seats for students of ..... that 2006 rules including the amended rule 11 are illegal, as they are beyond the legislative competence of the state government under sub-section (1) of section 14 of the capitation fee act, 1984. he would contend that rule 11 of the 2006 rules is erroneous, as it contemplates imposition of penalty on the students .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... being one year; going by these contemporary standards of several states and of the central government, it cannot be gainsaid that the fine amount prescribed by sec. 6 of the impugned act, ranging between rs. 15 lakh & rs. 30 lakh is arbitrary, unreasonable or disproportionate; the problem of acute shortage of medical service to the rural ..... or parents of the students and it runs counter to section 14 of the parent act, which empowers the rule making authority to make rules to regulate educational institutions charging exorbitant capitation fee and to provide adequate seats for students of ..... that 2006 rules including the amended rule 11 are illegal, as they are beyond the legislative competence of the state government under sub-section (1) of section 14 of the capitation fee act, 1984. he would contend that rule 11 of the 2006 rules is erroneous, as it contemplates imposition of penalty on the students .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... being one year; going by these contemporary standards of several states and of the central government, it cannot be gainsaid that the fine amount prescribed by sec. 6 of the impugned act, ranging between rs. 15 lakh & rs. 30 lakh is arbitrary, unreasonable or disproportionate; the problem of acute shortage of medical service to the rural ..... or parents of the students and it runs counter to section 14 of the parent act, which empowers the rule making authority to make rules to regulate educational institutions charging exorbitant capitation fee and to provide adequate seats for students of ..... that 2006 rules including the amended rule 11 are illegal, as they are beyond the legislative competence of the state government under sub-section (1) of section 14 of the capitation fee act, 1984. he would contend that rule 11 of the 2006 rules is erroneous, as it contemplates imposition of penalty on the students .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... being one year; going by these contemporary standards of several states and of the central government, it cannot be gainsaid that the fine amount prescribed by sec. 6 of the impugned act, ranging between rs. 15 lakh & rs. 30 lakh is arbitrary, unreasonable or disproportionate; the problem of acute shortage of medical service to the rural ..... or parents of the students and it runs counter to section 14 of the parent act, which empowers the rule making authority to make rules to regulate educational institutions charging exorbitant capitation fee and to provide adequate seats for students of ..... that 2006 rules including the amended rule 11 are illegal, as they are beyond the legislative competence of the state government under sub-section (1) of section 14 of the capitation fee act, 1984. he would contend that rule 11 of the 2006 rules is erroneous, as it contemplates imposition of penalty on the students .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... being one year; going by these contemporary standards of several states and of the central government, it cannot be gainsaid that the fine amount prescribed by sec. 6 of the impugned act, ranging between rs. 15 lakh & rs. 30 lakh is arbitrary, unreasonable or disproportionate; the problem of acute shortage of medical service to the rural ..... or parents of the students and it runs counter to section 14 of the parent act, which empowers the rule making authority to make rules to regulate educational institutions charging exorbitant capitation fee and to provide adequate seats for students of ..... that 2006 rules including the amended rule 11 are illegal, as they are beyond the legislative competence of the state government under sub-section (1) of section 14 of the capitation fee act, 1984. he would contend that rule 11 of the 2006 rules is erroneous, as it contemplates imposition of penalty on the students .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... being one year; going by these contemporary standards of several states and of the central government, it cannot be gainsaid that the fine amount prescribed by sec. 6 of the impugned act, ranging between rs. 15 lakh & rs. 30 lakh is arbitrary, unreasonable or disproportionate; the problem of acute shortage of medical service to the rural ..... or parents of the students and it runs counter to section 14 of the parent act, which empowers the rule making authority to make rules to regulate educational institutions charging exorbitant capitation fee and to provide adequate seats for students of ..... that 2006 rules including the amended rule 11 are illegal, as they are beyond the legislative competence of the state government under sub-section (1) of section 14 of the capitation fee act, 1984. he would contend that rule 11 of the 2006 rules is erroneous, as it contemplates imposition of penalty on the students .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... p4, p6 and p7 and taken note of the evidence given by the appellant in o.s.no.22/1993 42 and judicial notice was taken under section 56 of the indian evidence act and his admission is also extracted in paragraph 13 and taken note of the fact that the land has been converted as non-agricultural land in view ..... ancestors property within reasonable limits in favour of his daughter. the first appellate court also in paragraph 25 taken note of the legal position with regard to gift and section 226 of mulla s hindu law wherein it says that 34 the hindu father or other managing member has power to make gift, within reasonable limits of ancestral immovable ..... to the arguments, the counsel for the appellant filed further submission in addition to and in continuation of written submission of 18.03.2024 contending that the court can invoke section 103 (a) and (b) of cpc and relied upon the judgment of the apex court reported in air2021sc2438in the case of narayan sitaramji badwaik (dead) through lrs vs .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... p4, p6 and p7 and taken note of the evidence given by the appellant in o.s.no.22/1993 42 and judicial notice was taken under section 56 of the indian evidence act and his admission is also extracted in paragraph 13 and taken note of the fact that the land has been converted as non-agricultural land in view ..... ancestors property within reasonable limits in favour of his daughter. the first appellate court also in paragraph 25 taken note of the legal position with regard to gift and section 226 of mulla s hindu law wherein it says that 34 the hindu father or other managing member has power to make gift, within reasonable limits of ancestral immovable ..... to the arguments, the counsel for the appellant filed further submission in addition to and in continuation of written submission of 18.03.2024 contending that the court can invoke section 103 (a) and (b) of cpc and relied upon the judgment of the apex court reported in air2021sc2438in the case of narayan sitaramji badwaik (dead) through lrs vs .....
Tag this Judgment!