Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 section 2 income tax Court: karnataka Page 100 of about 16,996 results (0.157 seconds)

Sri B S Dalayath Vs. Bangalore Water Supply &

Court : Karnataka

..... management of the mine by the central government. thereafter, the coal mines nationalisation laws (amendment) ordinance and act, 1986 was issued. section 19(2) of the principal act as introduced by the amending act act and section 19 of the amending act act providing that the amount payable as compensation shall be deemed to include and deemed always to have included in ..... by the tribunal and respondents should have the benefit of the amended provision.24. in the case of capt. g.r. gopinath and another vs. syndicate bank, industrial finance branch, dickenson road, bangalore and others reported in 2019(1) kar. l.j.349 (db). relevant para nos.19 and 20 reads as under:19. alternatively, for ..... 11.2010 passed in w.p. no.20914/2010 and connected matters (para no.9) 4. capt. g.r. gopinath and another vs. syndicate bank , industrial finance branch and others reported in 2019(1) klj349(db) para nos.19 and20) 16. learned counsel for the respondents contend that petitioner was promoted to the post of .....

Karnataka Tipper Lorry Owners Association Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... state government:16. the learned senior counsel briefly replied to the submissions of the learned advocate general. he reiterated that the rule making power under section 15 of the said act of 1957 cannot be extended for regulating transportation of legally excavated minerals in other states. based on the decision of the apex court in the case ..... can be - 14 - exercised only to make a plenary law and not for exercising power of delegated legislation. he pointed out that neither section 15 nor section 23-c of the said act of 1957 permit the state government to levy the fees for recovering the expenses relating to setting up of infrastructure for checking illegal transportation.7. ..... in its statement of objections. he submitted that the impugned rule is not covered by the legislative power of the state either under section 15 or under section 23-c of the said act of 1957.6. the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the power of the state government to make a law .....

Sri Sai Keshava Enterprises Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... state government:16. the learned senior counsel briefly replied to the submissions of the learned advocate general. he reiterated that the rule making power under section 15 of the said act of 1957 cannot be extended for regulating transportation of legally excavated minerals in other states. based on the decision of the apex court in the case ..... can be - 14 - exercised only to make a plenary law and not for exercising power of delegated legislation. he pointed out that neither section 15 nor section 23-c of the said act of 1957 permit the state government to levy the fees for recovering the expenses relating to setting up of infrastructure for checking illegal transportation.7. ..... in its statement of objections. he submitted that the impugned rule is not covered by the legislative power of the state either under section 15 or under section 23-c of the said act of 1957.6. the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the power of the state government to make a law .....

Dr. Ishwarappa Shivaputrappa Katageri Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the departments of rural development & panchayat raj, co-operation, water resources, karnataka state seeds corporation, karnataka state seed certification agency, & karnataka agro- industries development corporation. (d) more importantly, section 67(1) of 2009 act creates the state co-ordination committee for agricultural - 22 - wa no.100030 of 2022 c/w wa no.100076 of2022education, research & extension, inter alia comprising of minister for ..... authorities of whom three are relevant viz, (i) board of management, (ii) academic council, & (iii) research council. these are statutory bodies. section 12(1) speaks of composition of bom: four principal secretaries each heading their respective departments, i.e., agriculture, finance, environment & forest and horticulture happen to be members; - 20 - wa no.100030 of 2022 c/w wa no.100076 of2022commissioner of .....

The University Of Agricultural Sciences Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... the departments of rural development & panchayat raj, co-operation, water resources, karnataka state seeds corporation, karnataka state seed certification agency, & karnataka agro- industries development corporation. (d) more importantly, section 67(1) of 2009 act creates the state co-ordination committee for agricultural - 22 - wa no.100030 of 2022 c/w wa no.100076 of2022education, research & extension, inter alia comprising of minister for ..... authorities of whom three are relevant viz, (i) board of management, (ii) academic council, & (iii) research council. these are statutory bodies. section 12(1) speaks of composition of bom: four principal secretaries each heading their respective departments, i.e., agriculture, finance, environment & forest and horticulture happen to be members; - 20 - wa no.100030 of 2022 c/w wa no.100076 of2022commissioner of .....

Sri Sa Ra Govindu Vs. The Government Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... order where he says that he had no jurisdiction to entertain the petition which is akin to election petition. therefore, it becomes necessary to notice section 25 of the act. section 25 of the act reads as follows: 25. enquiry by the registrar, etc.-. (1) the registrar may on his own motion and shall on the application ..... entertained the petition, at the outset, had passed an interim order that the executive committee constituted pursuant to the said elections shall not take major decisions involving finances or policies till the next date of hearing. the said interim order is in operation even as on date.5. the learned senior counsel for the petitioners ..... ; (iii) when an enquiry is made under this section, the registrar shall communicate the result of the enquiry to the society concerned.33. section 25 as extracted above clearly shows that, the registrar can hold an enquiry in the matter of constitution, working and the finance. this power the registrar can exercise either suo motu or .....

Mr. Himayath Ali Khan Vs. Ministry Of Home Affairs

Court : Karnataka

..... , liable to be apprehended or detained in custody in india; or (h) who, being a released convict, commits a breach of any rule made under sub-section (5) of section 356; or (i) for whose arrest any requisition, whether written or oral, has been received from another police officer, provided that the requisition specifies the person to ..... 1st respondent.6. the learned senior counsel sri k.shashikiran shetty, appearing for the petitioner would contend with vehemence that the petitioner is noway concerned with the finance that is borrowed by the company from the 2nd respondent/bank. the petitioner is only a non-functional director. he would take this court through the documents ..... or against whom a reasonable complaint has been made, or credible information has been received, or a reasonable suspicion exists, of his having been concerned in, any act committed at any place out of india which, if committed in india, would have been punishable as an offence, and for which he is, under any law .....

Mr. Abdul Azeem Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... rendered therein what would unmistakably emerge is, that no right of the petitioner is taken away. the petitioner is a nominee who is nominated under section 4 of the act. section 4 itself indicates that it is at the pleasure of the state. it is exercised and he is de- nominated. such de-nomination of a ..... at all times subject to the pleasure of the state?. 11. it is not in dispute that the petitioner was appointed in terms of section 4 of the act supra. sub-section (1) of section 4 clearly indicates that the chairman or other members shall hold office for a term of three years subject to pleasure of the government. ..... , was nominated as chairman of karnataka state minorities commission. the government of karnataka by virtue of the powers conferred under sec (3) sub sec (2) clause(1) and sec (4) of karnataka state minorities commission act-1994 (karnataka act 31 (1994), hereby cancels the nomination of shri khusro qureshi as chairman karnataka state minorities commission and in his place .....

A.R. Khandasari Sugar Works Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial T ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1981KAR1193; 1981(2)KarLJ109; [1982]49STC178(Kar)

..... the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the notification as under : 'finance secretariat notification no. fd110csl78, bangalore, dated the 1st august, 1978. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 8-a of the karnataka sales tax act, 1957 (karnataka act 25 of 1957), the government of karnataka hereby exempt the purchase tax payable ..... on sugarcane purchased by the sugar factories in the state during may and june, 1978. sd/- l. s. jagirdar, under secretary to government, finance department.' 3. the ..... appears to be some force in this contention. 5. the word 'sugar' is not defined in the act. 'sugar factory' is also not defined in the act. section 25-b of the act introduced in 1976 is the charging section. levy of purchase tax at the point of purchase of sugarcane itself makes only two distinctions. sugarcane .....

Cheekere Kariyappa Poovaiah Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR2959; 1994(4)KarLJ165

..... utilised by way of passage for approaching the bane land, that much portion of the land in possession of the neighbour could be acquired under the land acquisition act, section 47(2) cannot be read to mean that compensation is to be paid to the holder of unalienated bane land by acquiring the bane land as that situation ..... and the final decision in the civil suit shall be binding on the parties.' it becomes at once clear that section 67 of this act is almost parallel to section 42 of the coorg regulation. the next relevant section the section 70 which deals with 'right to mines and mineral products to vest in government'- it provides as under: 'save ..... from the government to acquire any land in the holding or enjoyment of others. then such land can be acquired under the provisions of land acquisition act, 1894. this sub-section 2 naturally contemplates acquisition of some other lands and not acquisition of bane lands itself as it continued to remain in the ownership of the government working .....