Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
..... shall retire on the age of 57 years. position in the cisf20 now we turn to the cisf. there is a cisf act of 1968 and the cisf rules of 2001. prior to 1988, the position in the cisf was governed by rule 65 of the cisf ..... was the expert body and the views of the majority of its members did deserve consideration at the hands of the ministry of finance. the view that there was no consensus between the members of the cpc on the issue and therefore status-quo had to ..... 57 years in other capfs and 60 years in cisf is commensurate with the different roles assigned to them. 43. the ministry of finance after perusing the report dated 19th november, 2015 of the 7th cpc in para 14 of a resolution dated 25th july, 2016 stated: ..... in subramanian swamy v. cbi (supra) where the supreme court examined whether section 6-a (1) of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 was constitutionally valid inasmuch as it required approval of the central government for conduct of an inquiry or investigation into an offence .....
Tag this Judgment!