Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 chapter i preliminary Court: orissa Page 5 of about 106 results (0.278 seconds)

Smt. Reena Padhi and Ors. Vs. Owners and parties, Interested, in the m ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1982Ori57

..... excluded is left for independent legislative determination.' the calcutta high court in national co. ltd. v. asia mariner. m. s. the owners ana parties interested ((1968) 72 cal wn 635) held:'the high court at calcutta as a courtof admiralty is, therefore, a court ofprescribed jurisdiction. its jurisdiction isprescribed bv clause 26 ..... of the charterof 1774 and by section 2(2) of thecolonial courts of admiralty act, 1890.the jurisdiction has not been extendedor modified by any statute. none of thesubsequent british, statutes by whichthe admiralty jurisdiction of the highcourt in england has ..... original or appellate, in that possession to be a colonial court of admiralty, and provide for the exercise by such court of its jurisdiction under this act. and limit territorially, or otherwise, the extent of such jurisdiction; and (b) confer upon any inferior or subordinate court in that possession such partial .....

Mayadhar Nayak Vs. Sub-divisional Officer, Jajpur and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1982Ori221; 54(1982)CLT265

..... as laid 2. is the petition barred by limitation? 3. does the application comply with the provisions of sections 81, 82, 100 and 117 of the act and rule 4 (iii) of chapter viii of the rules framed by the hon'ble high court 4. did respondent no. 3 satisfy the requirements as laid down under article 173(b) of ..... has been held (para 11):-- 'the entries in birth and death registers are public documents and are admissible under section 35 of the evidence act and it is not necessary to prove who made the entries and what was ..... court may presume that judicial and official acts have been regularly performed. he further argued that from the evidence of r. ws. 6 and 7 it is clear that they have reported the births of respondent no. 3 in cuttack municipality. mr. mohanty relied on a decision reported in air 1968 put 481 (biswanath gosain v. dulhin lalmuni) wherein it .....

Secondary Board of Education Vs. Income-tax Officer, Ward e

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 38(1972)CLT148

..... year by an auditor appointed by the state government. a copy of the audited accounts together with the auditor's report shall be published in the gazette.chapter viii of the regulations deals with the finances of the board. 17. it would thus be seen that by various statutory provisions the board fund is controlled and utilised for the purpose for which ..... ,99,694. annexure a is a print of the revised estimate for the year 1967-68 and budget estimate for the year 1968-69, annexure b is the notice under sections 139(2) and 133 of the income-tax act, 1961, issued by the income-tax officer, ward 'g', cuttack, to the petitioner asking it to file the return of income ..... for the assessment year 1968-69. in compliance to the said notice the petitioner filed a return in the prescribed form showing its total .....

Raghunath Mahanty and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1974Ori37

..... deals with either party -- landlord or raiyat -- applying for determination of fair and equitable rent. admittedly, 'rent' as defined in section 2 (27) of the act would cover both cash and kind rent. chapter ii of the act, deals with 'raivats' and 'tenants.' section 4, however, is exclusively confined to 'raivats' only. the scheme of the statute is that raiyats will pav rent ..... petitions of the type in question are civil proceedings is not open to dispute now. (see ramesh v. gendalal. air 1966 sc 1445 and arbind kumar v. nand kishore, air 1968 sc 1227). a special bench of the calcutta high court in the case of jay engineering works ltd. v. state of west bengal. air ..... 1968 cal 407 (sb) in our view has given cogent reasons as to why the civil procedure code should apply in the matter of such writ applications. in the case of bhagaban rath .....

Indian Aluminium Company Ltd. Vs. the Orissa State Electricity Board a ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1975Ori100

..... follow that the thermal scheme which was undertaken by the state government and transferred to the board some time in 1970 was not a scheme in terms of chapter v of the act and would not be a scheme as referred to in section 48 thereof.we have already indicated that the agreements stipulated supply of hydel power. there is ..... rejected by saving--'the plea of equitable estoppel need not occupy us long. we are pressed with the decision of the supreme court in anglo afghan agencies case, air 1968 sc 718 and in the century mills case, air 1971 sc 1021. the arguments based on these decisions covered familiar ground. on the pleadings, we are not satisfied, ..... paying subvention to the board with a view to meeting any loss on account of supply to the power intensive industries within the state at fixed low rates. in 1968, the state government installed the talcher thermal power station and the thermal project was inter-connected with the hydel system. in june, 1970, the thermal project was transferred .....

Prakash Chandra Sahu and ors. Vs. Managing Director, O.R.T. Co. and or ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1980Ori122

..... company was operating 300 routes with 260 vehicles, out of which a large number were worn out and old and that they did not comply with provisions of chapter v of the act and rules and that they did not obtain fitness certificates, and that while 85 buses were added to the fleet, 39 were deleted by sale or condemnation and ..... would in our opinion be futile for any objector to say that the central government, the state government or the authorities backed by it could not have equipment and finances to carry out the schemes. it seems to us that the very fact that a scheme is proposed suggests that the central government or a state government or the ..... genuine objections and bona fide representations to show that the scheme does not subserve the public interest. in the case of a. vishwanath rao v. state of mysore air 1968 mys 104, it was contended that the approved scheme was not in accordance with section 68-c since ft omitted to provide facilities for passengers travelling from places outside .....

Kishore Chandra Patel and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1993Ori259; 76(1993)CLT720

..... of the constitution.72. with the aforesaid in mind, let us examine the merit of the grievances of the petitioners relating to the provisions finding place in chapter iii of the act. we propose to do so separately qua each grievance.73. violation of natural justice.to decide about this complaint, we have to consider whether what has ..... authorised officer. another limb of shri rath's submission is that mere consultation would not meet the requirement of article 235 inasmuch as in sudhansu sekhar's case (air 1968 sc 647), the word used is 'consent'. the learned counsel in his written note has referred to some decisions bringing out the difference between the conception of ' ..... by shri rath, the learned advocate-general refers us to state of madhya pradesh v. azad bharat finance company, air 1967 sc 276, wherein while dealing with the word 'shall' as appearing in section ll(d) of the opium act, 1878 as applicable to madhya pradesh, it was held that this word does not always signify an .....

Mahendra Singh Jaggi Vs. Dataram Jagannath

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1986Ori110; 60(1985)CLT466

..... law on the subject.12. the powers of the registrar who is indisputably the taxing officer of this court have been enumerated in chapter v of the high court rules. the powers conferred upon him under this chapter are judicial in character, as will be patent from the rules, particularly rule 4, according to which, in the absence of the ..... the higher amount unless he pays court-fee therefor. in air 1979 sc 989, meenakshisundaram chettiar v. venkata chalam chettiar, analysing section 7(iv)(f) of the court-fees act, kailasam, j. speaking for the court held :--'reading this provision by itself the amount of court-fee payable in suits for accounts is according to the amount at which ..... is no longer res integra. a division bench of this court in the case of ganji veeraswami, (ilr 1968 orissa 326) (supra) held that suits for rendition of accounts are governed by section 7(iv)(f) of the court-fees act and court-fee is payable according to the amount at which the relief sought is valued in the plaint .....

Orient Paper and Industries Limited and anr. Vs. Superintendent, Centr ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1995(52)ECC1; 1996(82)ELT192(Ori); 1995(II)OLR299

..... changed in a subsequent year. 15. there is also reference to the decision reported in the self-same report at page 711 (union of india and ors. v. kamlakshi finance corporation ltd.). there the supreme court held the powers of assistant collector, central excise vis-a-vis matters disposed of by assistant collector by by-passing two appellate orders in ..... that despite remand it is still of the same view and the proper action for high court in such situation was pointed out.13. in the next case i.e. (1968) 3 scc 579 (m/s. jain exports (p) ltd. and anr. v. union of india and ors.) considering the concept of administrative law-guasi judicial decisions lower authorities bound ..... section 114 of the act or levy or raise demand of tax. the petitioners further state that up to 16-3-1976 duty on petitioner-company's products were specific, but after that, the duty became both specific and ad valorem as would be evident from columns 3 and 4 of the page in the said chapter which indicates in column .....

Ranedra Pratap SwaIn and anr. Vs. Ramesh Rout.

Court : Orissa

..... of biju janata dal. so, he must have verified form-a and form-b.10. mr. mishra further submitted that again as required under para-29.1 chapter-v of the hand book of returning officer and the instruction issued by the election commission of india, immediately after the last date and time fixed for filing ..... of patiala, that he was prejudiced in a departmental proceeding, since he was not supplied with copies of statements of witnesses and documents, as required under the regulation, 1968. even though, the regulation mandates that the delinquent shall be supplied with copies of statement of witnesses, if any, recorded earlier, not later than three days before ..... ) the question was whether passport of a person can be impounded without giving him/her an opportunity of being heard. there is no express provision in the passports act, 1967, which requires that the audi alteram partem rule should be followed before impounding a passport. but, still then, the apex court held that before impounding the .....