Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 chapter i preliminary Court: delhi Year: 1993 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.090 seconds)

Jul 02 1993 (HC)

JaIn Commission of Enquiry

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-02-1993

Reported in : 51(1993)DLT624

..... if possible. 'the commission had to collect information and gather material by recourse to powers exercisable under the commissions of inquiry act, 1952 with this end in view.' 7.4 it was also observed in chapter iii, paragraph 1.2 as follows :'1.2 it is understood that a special investigation team (sit) which is in charge ..... the cases : (j) saibal kumar gupta and ors. v. b.k. sen and anr., : 1961crilj749 ; (2) p.v. jagannathrao and ors. v. state of orissa and ors., : [1968]3scr789 ; (3) jang bahadur singh v. baijnath tiwari, : 1969crilj267 ; and (4) shambhu nath jha v. kedar prasad sinha and ors., : 1973crilj453 , decided by the supreme court made the ..... criminal court for decision are not made the subject matter of a reference of the commission of inquiry act.' this was perhaps the reason why in the terms of reference of the commission appointed under the ministry of finance order dated 11th dec., 1956 to go into the irregularities committed by certain companies controlled by shri rama .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 1993 (HC)

Faqir Chand (Through L.Rs.) Vs. Laila Ram (Through L.Rs.)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-15-1993

Reported in : 1993IIIAD(Delhi)168; AIR1994Delhi161; 51(1993)DLT505

..... about 32 months prior to the institution of the suit. the suit was instituted on december 12, 1970. the 32 months would take up back to about march-april, 1968.6. the respondent contested the suit pleading that in fact the said courtyard was kept for common use of both the parties and has been since used commonly and it ..... construction over a common wall was refused as the court had been approached by the plaintiff belatedly after 8 years of such construction.16. section 40 of the specific relief act, 1963, debars the court from granting any relief of damages in lieu of injunction unless and until the plaintiff has claimed such a relief in his plaint. an opportunity ..... said tin-shed as well as chhatta had been constructed more than three years prior to the filing of the suit and in view of art. 113 of the limitation act, 1963, the reliefs of mandatory injunction were barred by limitation. in the alternative he held that the lower court was not legally right in granting the alternative relief .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1993 (HC)

Ferruccio Sias and anr. Vs. Jai Manga Ram Mukhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-09-1993

Reported in : 1993IVAD(Delhi)713; 1994(28)DRJ143

..... within the limits of the power of attorney granted to them by the company. i) mr.n.s.mittal -.director ii) mr. y .l. madan : general manager (finance) iii) mr. m. dutta : general manager (customer focus facilitator) iv) mr. w. fossa : general manager (ptl construction) v) mr.s.k.bhattacharya -.general ..... other powers conferred by these articles, it is hereby expressly declared that the managing director and the joint managing director shall always subject to the provisions of act, have the following powers jointly and severally, that is to say; (17) to institute, prosecute, compound, defend, compromise, withdraw or abandon any legal ..... ltd., : air1991delhi25 has reviewed large number of cases bearing upon the question of signing and verification of plaints, postulated by order 29 civil procedure code ., the authority to act and authority to institutesuits,whenasuit is instituted by acorporation. in that judgment also, this court has reiterated what was stated in m/s. oberoi hotel (india) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 1993 (HC)

Akshay Finance and Trading Co. Vs. Income Tax Officer. (Also Arihant I ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-11-1993

Reported in : (1993)46TTJ(Del)630

..... high court dt. 12th aug., 1987 in the company petition nos. 21 to 26 of 1986 in the matter of d. k. oswal & ors. vs. m/s. akshay finance & trading co. & ors. (supra). since the assessed had moved application under r. 29 for admission of additional evidence, the arguments were heard on this preliminary ground. the learned ..... itr 454 which in turn followed the decision of the supreme court in the case of anglo-american direct tea trading co., ltd. vs . commr. of agrl. it : [1968]69itr667(sc) , it was submitted that additional evidence be admitted. the learned counsel for the assesseds at this stage admitted that the decision of the tribunal in the case of ..... could not declare higher dividend. the reply filed by the assessed did not find favor with the ito. thereforee, he imposed additional tax under s. 104 of the act observing that the assesseds are investment companies and borrowing funds and repaying it is a business activity. the companies may raise loan to pay off another or increase or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1993 (HC)

India Telecomp Limited Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-26-1993

Reported in : 50(1993)DLT117; 1993(25)DRJ605

..... as under :-the member for finance shall exercise powers of the government of india in financial matters concerning the department of telecommunications except in so far as such powers have been, or may in future be conferred on or delegated to the department.(19) section 3(vi) of the indian telegraph act, 1885, defines the ''telegraph ..... f) also recorded that mos (c) had desired that concept of revenue sharing should not be completely given up. m(f), thereforee, suggested two clause in chapter ii and chapter iv of the draft financial bid. he further added his note with reference to the selection committee report regarding factors such as inflation, exchange rate of variation ..... to be prejudiced, that is sufficient to quash the decision (see per lord denning, m.r. in metropolitan properties co. (f.g.c.) ltd. v. lannon (1968) 3 wlr 694 . we should not however, be understood to deny that the court might with greater propriety apply the 'reasonable suspicion' test in criminal or in the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //