Family Second Preference - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: family second preference Page 1 of about 40,088 results (0.141 seconds)Trustees of Gordhandas Govindram Family Charity Trust, Bombay Vs. Comm ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [1968]70ITR600(Bom)
to be given to the relations or members of the family of Sir Sassoon David Bart, in selecting the beneficiaries under category being those who belong to the Seksaira family, the second who belong to Navalgadh and the third those who belong mentioned in the wakf deed and the provision of giving preference to the members of the settlor's family and thereafter to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTrustees of Gordhandas Govindram Family Charity Trust Vs. Commissioner ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: [1952]21ITR231(Bom)
contended, a preference given to the members of the settlor's family. As I understand 'preference' it means that all other things for any charity or applied thereto. On that finding the second question which is raised on the second part of Section the learned Judge was to be considered as correct the preference that Kania, J., was thinking was not the preference which
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPadmavati Vs. Narsilal P. Dalal and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1956Bom81
to the conditions and directions that the members of the family of the, settlor were to be the first objects of Therefore it is argued that the preference indicated in the second part of the clause does not vitiate the gift made dispensaries, hospitals and sanitaria. Therefore it is argued that the preference indicated in the second part of the clause does not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTrustees of Gordhandas Govindram Family Charity Trust, Navalgadh Vs. t ...
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: AIR1952Bom346; (1952)54BOMLR178
public generally and incidentally or indirectly the members of the family of the settlor were also benefited, then a view may for any charity or applied thereto. On that finding the second question which is raised on the second part of Section poor, sick, aged and impotent should derive the benefit in preference to other poor persons similarly placed. This decision is relied
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Trustees of the Charity Fund Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Mumbai
Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR1452
the poor and indigent relations or the members of the family of Sir Sassoon David, Bart. cannot affect the public charitable Sassoon David, Bart., including therein distant and collateral relations. The second proviso, it is urged, makes it further clear that in provisions of 'the provisos, that is to say, by giving preference to the relations or members of the family of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Trustees of the Charity Fund, Esplanade Road, Fort, Bombay Vs. the ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1959SC1060; [1959]36ITR513(SC); [1959]Supp(2)SCR923
to the poor and indigent relations or members of the family of the said Sir Sassoon David, Bart., including therein the Sassoon David, Bart. including therein distant and collateral relations. The second proviso, it is urged, makes it further clear that in in applying the income as aforesaid the Trustees shall give preference to the poor and indigent relations or members of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLakshmi NaraIn Lath Trust Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Rajasthan
Reported in: [1969]73ITR402(Raj)
(vi) To render aid to any persons belonging to the family of Laths and to grant monthly and other periodical aids in trust wholly for religious or charitable purposes, and the second limb provides for such a property held in trust partly Ltd., it is open to the trustees to give him preference. Therefore, the trustees would not be guilty of committing any
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLaxmi NaraIn Lath Trust Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Rajasthan
Reported in: AIR1966Raj154
as it will be for the needy members of the family this provision will still fall in the ambit of dominant in trust wholly for religious or charitable purposes, and the second limb provides for such a property held in trust partly laid down that in selecting beneficiaries the trustees shall give preference to any employees of a particular company or members of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaju Vs. Nagar Nigam Jodhpur
Court: Rajasthan
Reported in: 2001(2)WLN634
and if there is more than one member in the family is in the employment then the preference would be given is already one member of the family is in employment, preference should be given to those persons from whose family no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMahabir Singh and anr. Vs. Matabadal Singh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: AIR1924All735; (1924)ILR46All549; 79Ind.Cas.327
mode of procedure, they may obtain a separation of their family share of the estate, and procure a separate patta, subject of preserving union among the different sections of large families, preferring occasional and individual claims to the courts of justice. The
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>