Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.795 of 2013 12-03-2014 Devendar Gupta and another..appellants National Investigation Agency, rep. by Mr.Mahesh Chandra Ladha, Superintendent of Police, Hyderabad..Respondent Counsel for the appellants: Sr.N. Ramachander Rao, Sr.Counsel Counsel for the Respondent: Sr.P. Vishnuvardhan Reddy, Special P.P. GIST: HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred 1) AIR1958SC792) 2011(3) GLT6153) 2001 SCC (Crl.) 472 THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.795 of 2013 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) On 18-05-2007, which is a Friday, prayers were being offered as usual, in Mecca Masjid, near Charminar, at Hyderabad. A blast took place around 1:25 p.m.Five persons died and many received injuries. Initially, the Station House Officer, Hussaini Alam Police Station registered Crime No.100/2007, alleging offences punishable under Sec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1062 of 2013 20-02-2014 Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari @ Abdul Salem....Appellant/Accused No.1 State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Special P.P.for CBI,High Court of A.P, Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for Appellant: Sr.Pradeep Kumar. S and Sr.S. Pasbola. Counsel for Respondent: Sr.P. Kesava Rao, Special Standing Counsel for CBI : ?.Cases referred: 1) 2005 SCC (Crl) 1715 2) 1995 SCC (Crl) 215 3) 1999 SCC (Crl) 127 4) 2001 SCC (Crl) 160 5) (2009) 3 SCC (Crl) 66 6) 1997 SCC (Cri) 1004 7) (2001) 4 SCC5168) (1988) 3 SCC6099) (2011) 1 SCC28410) AIR1961SC176211) (1996) 4 SCC65912) (1987) 2 SCC17= AIR1987SC77313) 2013 (3) ALT (Cri) 385 14) (2011) 11 SC214=(2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 125 THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1062 of 2013 Judgment: This Criminal Appeal is preferred by accused No.1-Abu Salem Qayoom Ansari @ Abu Salem against the judgment dated 18-11-2013 in C.C.No.3 of 2006 passed by III Additional Spec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO W.P.No.23079 OF200510-02-2014 Smt.T.Subhadra and two others....petitioners Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, rep.by its Commissioner and another.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioners : Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana Counsel for the Respondents: Smt.A.Deepthi, Standing Counsel for GHMC. : : ?. Cases referred:1. AIR2001A.P. 345 2. AIR1995A.P.208 3. 2004(5) ALD6604. (2005) 2 SCC1265. AIR1995A.P. 230 6. 2001(3) ALT2007. 2011(6) ALD2838. 2001 (2) ALD182(DB) THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO W.P.NO.23079 OF2005ORDER:- Around 2000 B.C., King of Heracleopolis wrote to his son, ".Do justice, that you may live long upon earth. Calm the weeper, do not oppress the widow, do not oust the man from his father's property, do not degrade magnates from their seats. Beware of punishing wrongly; do not kill, for it will not profit you.". These wise words apart, we have a written law which was breached in this case. 02. A widow, aged abo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.1688 of 2013 21-01-2014 Boya Kothi Lakshmanna (A-13) and another...Petitioners The State of A.P. rep. byP.P. High Court of A.P.,Hyderabad and another ....Respondents Counsel for petitioners: Sri H.Prahlad Reddy Counsel for respondent No.1 : Public Prosecutor ^Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri K.V.Raghuveer HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.1688 of 2013 Date:21-01-2014 ORDER: This criminal revision case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the order passed by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Adoni in Crl.M.P.No.55 of 2013 in S.C.No.63 of 2009, dated 25.07.2013 and to direct the Presiding Officer to visit the scene of offence for the purpose of better appreciation of evidence in this case.2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State.3. The petitioners ar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Incharge President 1. The complainant filed the complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, complaining deficiency in service against the opposite parties seeking direction to the opposite parties to carry out repairs to the damaged vehicle at the cost and consequences of the opposite parties no.3 and 4, pay an amount of Rs.30 lakhs together with costs of the complaint. 2. The averments of the complainant are that on 10.11.2010 the complainant purchased Mercedes Benz Mode No.350 Couple BSIV from the show room of the opposite party no.2 the authorized dealer of the opposite party no.1 for on road price of Rs.71,15,701/- which includes the insurance amount of Rs.2,37,634/-. The vehicle was insured with the opposite parties no.3 and 4 vide policy No.1801702311003916 valid for the period from 01.11.2010 to 31.10.2011. On 20.8.2011 the vehicle was logged with rain water and was shifted to the workshop of the opposite party no.2 for repairs. The opposit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The appellant is the wife of Narsimha Chary who during his train journey on 12.7.2004 at about 11.40 hours died as a result of blast in the train. A case was registered in Cr.No.110/2004 by the Railway Police, Wadi. The appellant made a claim to the respondent on 1.3.2005 for payment of the claim amount and the respondent repudiated the claim on 9.9.2005 on the ground that the appellant did not make claim intimation within the stipulated period 30 days and the claim submission with supporting documents within period of 90 days. The appellant being illiterate had no knowledge about the insurance policy issued covering the risk due to accident on her deceased husband till her relatives handed over the policy paper to the appellant. The appellant filed writ petition in High Court of Andhra Pradesh in W.P.No.24448 of 2005 wherein the High Court directed the respondent to pay the claim amount to ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.13568 OF2010Dated:11. 07-2013 1.V.Ramesh Babu S/o. Ranga Rao, aged 48 years, occupation: Business,r/o. PlotNo.526 MIG-2, Road No.1, KPHB Colony, Hyderabad-500 085. 2.S.Ram Mohan S/o. S.V.Purnachander Rao,aged 47 years, occupation: Finance Manager in VR Equipments & Consumables Pvt. Ltd., r/o. Balajinagar, Kukatpally,Ranga Reddy District. ..... PETITIONERS/ A-1 & A-2 1.State of A.P. rep.by P.P. High Court, Hyderabad...... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT2 M/s. Goutham Printers rep.by its Sole Proprietor A.Manikyala Rao S/o. Venkat Swamy, aged about:38. years, Occ: Business, Having their office at H.No.1-73/1, BJP office road,Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District. .... RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT Counsel for Petitioners:Sri P.Prabhakar Reddy & G.Mallesham. Counsel for Respondent : Public Prosecutor GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?.Cases referred :2012. (2) ALD (Crl.) 211 (AP) (2007)12 SCC page 1 (2005)10 Supreme Court Cases 228 (2010)10 S...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The respondent filed complaint claiming insured sum of Rs.14,92,500/- with interest , compensation and costs. The respondent is the owner of the Link Belt HT450Mobile Crane bearing No.MH43 1808 which was insured with the appellant vide policy bearing No.550213/31/08/630001112 for a sum of Rs.36,00,000/-. The policy covers the risk including Accidental loss or damage occurring during the period of insurance and validfor the period from 8.11.2008 to 7.11.2009. On 26-1-2009, on receipt of phone call from one person regarding accident, the respondent sent mobile crane to the accident spot on the same day at 4.30 PM and the crane started lifting the fly ash tanker and during the process, the fly ash weight in lorry has shifted from one end to another end resulting in tare of crane into two parts. 2. The police conducted spot panchanama and in the mean while the respondent reached the spot and has intimated...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Crl.A.No.1197 o18. 04.2013 National Investigation Agency, NIA, Hyderabad. Devendra Gupta and another HEAD NOTE: !Spl. Public Prosecutor for NIA::Sri P.Vishnuvardhan Reddy, Senior Counsel for the respondents 1 & 2 : Sri N.Ramachander Rao, representing Sri M.Vijaya Kanth and Sri Venugopal Julakanti. Cases referred:1. (2009) 3 SCC (Cri) 1480=2009 11 SCC 54.2 (2004) SCC (Cri) 829= (2004) 3 SCC 44.3 (2004) 9 SCC 58.4 (2004) 7 SCC 52.5 (2002) 3 SCC 59.6 (2008) 16 SCC 75.7 (2008) 13 SCC 58.8 (2001) 6 SCC 33.9 (1996) 2 SCC 61.10 (2005) 3 SCC 14.11 (2012) 9 SCC 44.12 Crl.A.No.29 of 2011, dt.July 27, 2011 (unreported1990. 1 SCC 39.14 (1988) 2 SCC 27.15 Unreported Judgment in Crl.A.No.824 of 2012, dt.21.12.2012. 16 AIR 197.SC 8.17 AIR 199.SC 198.18 AIR 201.SC 83.JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao) This is an appeal filed u/S.21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 by the National I...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO.74 OF 201.25.03.2013 Vadde Veeresh and another The State of A.P. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy Counsel for respondents 3, 5 to 7, 9 to 11,13 to 16, 18, 19, 37, 39 and 41: Sri V.L.Surendra, Counsel for the respondents 8, 20, 22, 26, 29, 35, 36, 38, 43 & 44: Sri O.Kailasnath Reddy Counsel for the respondents 12, 17, 2427. 28, 30 to 34, 40 and 42: Sri H.Prahalad Reddy, Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Public Prosecutor representing the State HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred:1. 2002)5 SCC 73.ORDER: This criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the Accused Nos.23 and 41 in Sessions Case No.63 of 2009 on the file of the II Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool at Adoni to direct the learned Additional Sessions Judge to proceed with the trial without conducting de nova trial and dispose of the case.2. I have heard Sri T.Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the p...
Tag this Judgment!