Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2002CriLJ770
Ramesh Madhav Bapat, J.1. Appellants herein were accused Nos. 2 to 21 in sessions case No. 459/1996 on the file of the IV Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool. A1 was not produced from the Central Prison, Cuddapah, as he was involved in another case in which he was convicted for life and hence the case against him was separated and numbered as S.C. No. 424 of 1999. The case against him, therefore, was separated and trial proceeded against the remaining accused only. Accused-appellants were tried for eighteen different charges. First charge against A1 to A21 was under Section 148 I.P.C. Second charge against them was under Section 307 I.P.C. Third charge against A1, A2, A12, A13, A15, A16, A19 and A20 was under Section 302 I.P.C. Fourth charge against A3 to A11, A14, A17, A18 and A21 was under Section 302 read with 149 I.P.C. Fifth charge against A2, A12, A13, A16, A19 and A20 was under Section 302 I.P.C. Sixth charge against A1, A3 to A11, A14, A17, A18 and A21 was under Section 302 read...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(1)ALD628; 2007(1)ALT398
ORDERP.S. Narayana, J.1. Vijaya Oil Company, Guntur is the writ petitioner in both these Writ Petitions. 2. W.P. No. 34076/97 is filed praying for issuance of an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent in Rc. No. E1/381/97 dated 20-11-1997 and the consequential proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Roc. No. 6847/97/G1 dated 28-11 -1997 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, mala fide, opposed to principles of hatural justice and null and void and to pass such other suitable orders.3. Vijayawada, Guntur, Tenali Urban Development Authority, Vijayawada, Municipal Corporation, Guntur and M/s. Hindustan Petrolium Corporation Limited, Secunderabad, were originally shown as respondents. G.Saraswathi, a neighbour, filed an application to implead herself as a party in WPMP. No. 3173/98 and by order dated 1 -7-98 she was impleaded as 4th respondent.4. R-2 and R.3 filed counter aff...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(2)ALT346; 2007CriLJ2031
J. Chelameswar, J.1. This writ petition is filed by five petitioners with the prayer as follows:For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus or any other writ, order or direction more in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the petitioners before this Hon'ble Court and set them at liberty and pass such other order or orders which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and necessary in the circumstances of the case.2. There are fifteen respondents who are officers of the State of Andhra Pradesh in the Police Department. The 1st petitioner claims to be the General Secretary of a political party known as CPI (ML) Janashakti party. The others are the followers of the 1st petitioner. The 2nd and 3rd petitioners are the natives of Andhra Pradesh, 4th and 5th petitioners are claimed to be the residents of Mumbai and Ranipur in Uttar Pradesh respectively. Admittedly all the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2004(1)ALD(Cri)894; 2004(3)ALT723
Devinder Gupta, C.J.1. The petitioner who claims to be a public-spirited person, swayed by News item that only 46 prisoners were released out of more than 500 such eligible persons aftercompletion of ten years of sentenceincluding remission, filed this petition as PIL,after furnishing details of prisonersundergoing sentence in various jails in theState, the offences for which they have beenconvicted and the sentences imposed in therelevant crime cases and the period ofsentence undergone. He submits that notless than five hundred prisoners all over theState are eligible to bet released by virtue ofthe policy decision taken by the Governmentof Andhra Pradesh to release prisoners oncompletion of ten years of imprisonmentincluding remission i.e., seven years actualimprisonment and three years remissionperiod. Petitioner states that instead ofreleasing all the eligible prisoners, theGovernment have released only 46prisoners. He, therefore, has sought adirection to declare Para 5 of G.O.Ms.N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.450 of 2010 24-04-2014 K.Venkata Rami Reddy and otheRs.appellants. The State of A.P...Respondent Counsel for appellants:Sr.T.Bali Reddy Counsel for Respondent : Additional Public Prosecutor. HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE Sr.JUSTICE M.S.K.JAISWAL Criminal Appeal No.450 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per the Honble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) A.1 to A.5 were put to trial in S.C.No.350 of 2008 on the file of the III Additional Sessions Judge, Kurnool, alleging that they caused the death of Vanipenta Brahma Rudra Reddy, in the afternoon of 27.12.2006 in the limits of Bandarlapalli Village of Kurnool District. Complaint with reference to the offence was submitted by the brother of the deceased PW.1, at 6.30 P.M., before the P.S.Kolimigundla. He stated that A.1, by name, Katasani Venkata Rami Reddy, was the native of Tadipatri and ever since he was mar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1062 of 2013 20-02-2014 Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari @ Abdul Salem....Appellant/Accused No.1 State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Special P.P.for CBI,High Court of A.P, Hyderabad ...Respondent Counsel for Appellant: Sr.Pradeep Kumar. S and Sr.S. Pasbola. Counsel for Respondent: Sr.P. Kesava Rao, Special Standing Counsel for CBI : ?.Cases referred: 1) 2005 SCC (Crl) 1715 2) 1995 SCC (Crl) 215 3) 1999 SCC (Crl) 127 4) 2001 SCC (Crl) 160 5) (2009) 3 SCC (Crl) 66 6) 1997 SCC (Cri) 1004 7) (2001) 4 SCC5168) (1988) 3 SCC6099) (2011) 1 SCC28410) AIR1961SC176211) (1996) 4 SCC65912) (1987) 2 SCC17= AIR1987SC77313) 2013 (3) ALT (Cri) 385 14) (2011) 11 SC214=(2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 125 THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1062 of 2013 Judgment: This Criminal Appeal is preferred by accused No.1-Abu Salem Qayoom Ansari @ Abu Salem against the judgment dated 18-11-2013 in C.C.No.3 of 2006 passed by III Additional Spec...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1998(5)ALD536
ORDERN.Y. Hanumanthappa, J. 1. ThisWrit Petition is filed by Smt. Tasneem Fatima, w/o Mohd. Naseentddin, resident of Jeevanyarjung Colony, Sayeedabad, Hyderabad, alleging that her husband Mohd. Naseentddin s/o Mohd Haneefuddin, has been illegally detained by the 2nd respondent on 4-7-1998 at his residence when he was leaving for hospital for treatment of his disease (slip-disc). Earlier to this also the detenu washospitalised for treatment of the said disease in Princess Durru Shahwar Hospital, Purani Haveli, Hyderabad. According to her the detention of her husband is bad and illegal. It is also stated in the petition that the detenu is a peace loving and law abiding citizen and is a member of a non-political party Jamaat-e-Islami, an organisation dedicated to social service to all people irrespective of their caste and religion. According to her the party has a glorious record of over 50 years in the promotion of peace, education and welfare of the people. According to her immediately...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2003(1)ALD(Cri)808
Crl. R.C. No. 1329 of 1999R.M. Bapat, J.1. This Criminal revision case is filed by the de facto complainant in S.C. No. 331 of 1996 against the order of acquittal dated 27.7.1999 recorded by II Additional Sessions Judge, Cuddapah. Since, Criminal Appeal No. 174 of 2000 is also filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh against the same order, in our considered opinion, the Criminal R.C. No. 1329 of 1999 does not survive. Accordingly, it is dismissed. Criminal Appeal No. 174 of 2000 R.M. Bapat, J.2. This appeal is filed by the State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Public Prosecutor aggrieved by the order of acquittal recorded by the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Cuddapah in Sessions Case No. 331 of 1996 acquitting the accused 1 to 7 of all the charges.3. The prosecution has framed, in all, 7 charges against the accused-respondents herein. The first charge was under Section 148 IPC against A-1 to A7. The Second Charge was under Section 302 IPC against A-1 to A-7. The third charg...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1998(1)ALD304; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)932; 1997(6)ALT625; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)439
ORDERP. Ramakrishnam Raju, J.1. This writ petition is field seeking for a direction to provide a gunman to the petitioner, as the Superintendent of Police, Kurnool failed to provide, in spite of several representations.2. The petitioner states that he is a staunch supporter of Congress - (I) parry since a long time, and had been a follower of late Madduru Subba Reddy, Ex.-Member of Parliament (MP) from Nandyal Constituency. One Sri Byreddy Rajasekhar Reddy, 16lh Respondent, a sitting Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) from Nandikotkur Constituency was opposed to late Madduru Subba Reddy. In the last Assembly elections, the 16th respondent contested on Telugu Desam Party (TDP) ticket; while Congress (I) fielded one Gidda Reddy. While the petitioner was extending support to Gidda Reddy, the 16th respondent attacked him and also one Gouru Venkat Reddy at Kollabapuram village while they were canvassing for Congress - (I) candidate. After the said attack, gunman was provided to him. The f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
ORDER: This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., is filed to quash the proceedings in Sessions Case No.36 of 2006 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Sompeta, Srikakulam District, in which the petitioner is arrayed as A1 for the offence punishable under Section 5 read with Section 6 of the Explosives Substances Act, 1908 (for short, "the Act"). Facts, which give rise to filing of this petition, are that the petitioner is one of the directors of a Granite leasing company viz., M/s.Gallop Granites Private Limited. The said company was granted lease in the year 1997 in respect of the land to an extent of 15 hectares in survey No.1 of Addukonda Village, Tekkali Mandal, Srikakulam District, for the purpose of mining operations. When the Inspector of Police, Vigilance and Enforcement, and his staff visited M/s.Gallop Granites Ltd., Melisathiwadsa on 17.11.2000, he found no records at the site except one person K.V.Ramaiah and that A2 was coming with a plastic bag containing explosive sub...
Tag this Judgment!