Court : Delhi
$~ * + K. RETHINAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8114/2017 ...Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikram Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Abdul Saleem, Mr.S.Elambharathi, Mr.Harshit Sethi and Mr.Rishi Sehgal, Advocates versus + UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr.Kunal Dutt, Mr.Abhishek Ghai and Ms.Anumita Chandra, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER1101.2018 % In view of the judgment passed today by this Court in W.P.(C) 5320/2017 and the connected petitions including the present one, a copy of which judgement is placed below, prayer (a) (i) in this petition is dismissed. The petition be listed before the learned Single Judge on 6th February 2018 for the remaining prayers. S. MURALIDHAR, J.I.S. MEHTA, J.JANUARY11 2018 Rm $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 06, 2017 Pronounced on: January 11, 2018 + J SEKAR W.P. (C) 5320/2017 ........ Petitioner Throug...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * + K. RETHINAM IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8115/2017 ...Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikram Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Abdul Saleem, Mr.S.Elambharathi, Mr.Harshit Sethi and Mr.Rishi Sehgal, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr.Kunal Dutt, Mr.Abhishek Ghai and Ms.Anumita Chandra, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER1101.2018 % In view of the judgment passed today by this Court in W.P.(C) 5320/2017 and the connected petitions including the present one, a copy of which judgement is placed below, prayer (a) (i) in this petition is dismissed. The petition be listed before the learned Single Judge on 6th February 2018 for the remaining prayers. S. MURALIDHAR, J.I.S. MEHTA, J.JANUARY11 2018 Rm $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 06, 2017 Pronounced on: January 11, 2018 + J SEKAR W.P. (C) 5320/2017 ........ Petitioner Throug...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN AND ORS. W.P.(C) 8521/2017 ...Petitioners Through: Mr.Vikram Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Harshit Sethi, Ms.Aakriti Mathur, Mr.Faraz Khan and Mr.Rishi Sehgal, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms.Mohita Srivastava, Advocate for UOI CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER1101.2018 % In view of the judgment passed today by this Court in W.P.(C) 5320/2017 and the connected petitions including the present one, a copy of which judgement is placed below, prayer (a) (i) in this petition is dismissed. The petition be listed before the learned Single Judge on 6th February 2018 for the remaining prayers. S. MURALIDHAR, J.I.S. MEHTA, J.JANUARY11 2018 Rm $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 06, 2017 Pronounced on: January 11, 2018 + J SEKAR W.P. (C) 5320/2017 ........ Petitioner Through:Mr.Vikram Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + DHAWAN CREATIVE PRINTS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. W.P.(C) 9808/2017 & CM APPL.39897/2017 ...Petitioners Through: Mr.Vikram Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Harshit Sethi, Mr.Sangram S Saron and Mr.Rishi Sehgal, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr.Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr.Sanjay Pal and Mr. Akshaya Agarwal, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA ORDER1101.2018 % In view of the judgment passed today by this Court in W.P.(C) 5320/2017 and the connected petitions including the present one, a copy of which judgement is placed below, prayer (a) (i) in this petition is dismissed. The petition and pending application be listed before the learned Single Judge on 6th February 2018 for the remaining prayers. S. MURALIDHAR, J.I.S. MEHTA, J.JANUARY11 2018 Rm $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 06, 2017 Pronounced on: January 11, 2018 + J SEKAR W.P. (C) 5320/2017 ........ Petiti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR Writ Appeal No.1202/2012 Sunil Rathi..Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh and others..Respondents For the appellant : Shri Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate, with Shri Swapnil Sohgaura, Advocate. For the respondent: Shri Vivek Agrawal, Government Advocate. ****** Present: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE AJIT SINGH ****** ORDER ( 25.2.2013) This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 24.8.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby he has dismissed the appellants Writ Petition No.4788/2011.2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to this appeal are these. On 26.2.2002 a criminal case was registered against the appellant. During the pendency of this criminal case the appellant contested the election of the office of President, Nagar Panchayat, Ichhawar, district Sehore, and was declared elected on 17.12.2009. The appellant was, however, convicted for offences under section 9 of the Indian Explosives Act, 1884 and...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
This Writ Petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the proceedings of respondent No.3 in reference No.S.E/O/VJA/SAO/JAO-HT/R2.A3/D.No.616/12, dated 1-7-2012, whereby he has recategorised the electrical connection of the Unit of the petitioner at Vijayawada bearing Consumer Service No.VJA 557 from HT Category-I to HT Category-II, as illegal and arbitrary. Evolution of the petitioner company: The petitioner averred that the Government of India has taken over M/s. Esso Standard Eastern Inc., (a foreign company) under Esso (Acquisition of Undertakings in India) Act 1974, to cater to the needs of public in the country of petroleum products; that in September 1974 the name of the said company was changed to Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL); that thereafter some more oil companies, including M/s. Caltex Oil Refiding (India) Limited, were taken over and merged with HPCL by the Government of India; and that HPCL is a Government of India Company under Section 617 of the Companie...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R Reserved on :13. 08.2024 Pronounced on :31. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024C/W WRIT PETITION No.18539 OF2024(GM RES) IN CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024BETWEEN:1. . SRI VIKRAM BALLARI S/O UDAY KUMAR BALLARI AGED ABOUT33YEARS RESIDENT OF6H CROSS, MARATHA COLONY, DHARWAD, HUBBALLI- DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 2 . SRI KIRTIKUMAR BASAVARAJ KURAHATTI S/O BASAVARAJ T. KURAHATTI, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, RESIDENT OF ITIGATTI VILLAGE AND POST, DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 3 . SRI SANDEEP SAUDATTI S/O SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT36YEARS RESIDENT OF MARATHA COLONY, MALAPUR ROAD, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE, DHARWAD, HUBBALLI- DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 2 4 . SRI VINAYAK KATAGI S/O BASAVARAJ NINGAPPA KATAGI, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, RESIDENT OF BHUSAPPA CHOUK, KARUBAR ONI, HUBBALLI-DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 5 . SRI MAHABALESHWAR HONGAL @ MUDAKA S/O MALLAPA HONGAL AGED ABOUT38YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R Reserved on :13. 08.2024 Pronounced on :31. 08.2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024C/W WRIT PETITION No.18539 OF2024(GM RES) IN CRIMINAL PETITION No.7467 OF2024BETWEEN:1. . SRI VIKRAM BALLARI S/O UDAY KUMAR BALLARI AGED ABOUT33YEARS RESIDENT OF6H CROSS, MARATHA COLONY, DHARWAD, HUBBALLI- DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 2 . SRI KIRTIKUMAR BASAVARAJ KURAHATTI S/O BASAVARAJ T. KURAHATTI, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, RESIDENT OF ITIGATTI VILLAGE AND POST, DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 3 . SRI SANDEEP SAUDATTI S/O SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT36YEARS RESIDENT OF MARATHA COLONY, MALAPUR ROAD, NEAR GANESH TEMPLE, DHARWAD, HUBBALLI- DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 2 4 . SRI VINAYAK KATAGI S/O BASAVARAJ NINGAPPA KATAGI, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, RESIDENT OF BHUSAPPA CHOUK, KARUBAR ONI, HUBBALLI-DHARWAD CITY 580 001. 5 . SRI MAHABALESHWAR HONGAL @ MUDAKA S/O MALLAPA HONGAL AGED ABOUT38YEARS, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE08H DAY OF JUNE, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1829 OF2022BETWEEN: ANANDA S/O JONAPPA AGED ABOUT30YEARS, R/AT TRUNASI VILLAGE MASTHI HOBLI, MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT 563 139. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI BASAVARAJU T.A., ADVOCATE) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY MASTHI POLICE STATION, KOLAR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PUBLIC PROSECUTORS OFFICE AT HIGH COURT BUILDING, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AMBEDKAR VEEDI AT BENGALURU 560 001.2. SUSHEELAMMA W/O LATE CHIKKATHIMMARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT46YEARS, R/AT TRUNASI VILLAGE MASTHI HOBLI2MALUR TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT 563 139. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K.S.ABHIJITH, HCGP FOR R1; R2 SERVED - UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED3112.2021 PASSED IN S.C.NO.227/2018 BY HONBLE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT KOLAR DISTRICT. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVIN...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR718; 2007(3)BomCR772; 2007(4)CTC257; 2007(4)MhLj517; 2007(5)AIRKarR180; AIR2007NOC2237(FB)(Bom)
F.I. Rebello, J.1. A learned Single Judge noticing apparent inconsistencies or conflicts in judgments of learned Single Judges and of the Division Benches, as to whether a suit based on a writing or a receipt or an acknowledgement of liability, or honoured cheque or a settled account is maintainable as a summary suit, referred the matter to the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, who has placed the matter for consideration before the Full Bench. The issues which arise for our consideration and as referred to us, arise under Order XXXVII, Rule 2 (Summary Suit), in cases where the suit is based : i) On a settled account duly confirmed by the Defendants;ii) On a settled account which is not confirmed by the Defendants;iii) On an acknowledgment of liability;iv) On honoured cheque; andv) On a mere writing or a receipt;2. Before we proceed to answer the reference, we may consider the legislative history of the relevant rule of Order XXXVII. Order XXXVII Rule 2, the relevant rule, as originally enacte...
Tag this Judgment!