Court : Allahabad
V.K. Dixit, J.1. By this appeal, the appellant Amar Singh seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 25.11.1997 passed by the learned Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Aligarh in Sessions Trial No. 388 of 1995 holding him guilty of the charge under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Smt. Son Devi (hereafter referred to as 'deceased') and the order sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for life.2. Thumbnail sketch of the facts of the case is as mentioned herein below:The complainant Kishan Lal resident of village Piwari Police Station Bharhara District Etah,father of the deceased lodged an FIR at Police Station Sikandra Rao District Aligarh on 07.04.1994 at 18.10 hrs. to the effect that deceased was married to Sri Pal Singh resident of village Chhonkara Police Station Sikandrarao District Aligarh about eleven years back. The deceased had two daughters. His daughter's fatherinlaw appellant Amar Singh who was widower, had an evil eye upon her and since his daughter did not succumb to th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1969
Rakesh Tiwari, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.2. The petitioner is a tenant of the property in dispute which is in the nature of a shop. The sole respondent Sri Prem Chand Goyal is the landlord of the aforesaid shop.3. After giving notice of termination of tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act read with Section 20 of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972) the landlord filed an application under Section 21(1)(a) of the aforesaid Act No. XIII of 1972 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the ground of bona fide need for his eldest son who is said to be unemployed. It was averred in the application that not only his son would be settled in life, the income of the family would also augment.4. The petitioner-tenant filed his written statement before the court below stating, inter alia, that the eldest son of the landlord is not unemployed. It was further averred by him...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : 1987(12)ECC310
K.C. Agrawal, J.1. The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed by Dabur (Dr. S.K. Burman) Private Limited, Sahibabad, district Ghaziabad and Jagat Singh Bisht, who was the wholesale dealer of Dabur products, carrying on his business in Almora. The reliefs sought for by this petition is for quashing of the notifications, the details of which would be given at appropriate places in this judgment, and for mandamus directing the State of U.P. and the Excise Commissioner as also its officers from interfering with the business of the petitioners in Ayurvedic medicines, including Mrit Sanjiwani Sura, in pursuance of the impugned notifications and the Rules published by respondents 1 and 2 on 14th September, 1978.2. For discussing the points urged, since it is necessary to make a brief reference of the relevant provisions of the U.P. Excise Act, we hereby do so. Amongst the various objects of the aforesaid Act enumerated in its Preamble, one of them is to carry into ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1981All292
Satish Chandra, C.J.1. Two principal questions of law require consideration by this Full Bench. The first is whether the restriction imposed by the Excise Commissioner that all excise shops shall, with effect from December 20, 1980, remain closed on Friday also, will apply to the pre-existing licensees of excise shops. The second question is whether the variation of the strength of liquor is valid.2. We shall take up the question of Friday closure first. The wholesale and retail sale of liquor and other excisable articles is generally permitted by auctioning shops of various places to the highest bidder. This is an auction system of sale of excise shops.3. Previously, according to paragraphs 351 and 352 of the U. P. Excise Manual, the excise shops could ,be kept open till 10 P. M. On September 18, 1977, notifications were issued amending these rules and directing that the licensees of excise shops shall keep their shops open till 8 P. M. only. Thus, the business hours were reduced by t...
Tag this Judgment!