Evacuee Property - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: evacuee property Page 1 of about 147 results (0.024 seconds)Custodian, Evacuee Property, Punjab Vs. Gujar Singh and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jun-23-1952
Reported in: AIR1953P& H161
property is or is not evacuee property or whether an evacuee has or has not any right or interest in any of 1949 continued the vesting in the Custodian of any property which had vested in the Custodian under the 1947 Act.
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Custodian, Evacuee Property, New Delhi and ors. Vs. Official Re ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-03-1964
Reported in: AIR1965SC951; [1965]1SCR220
have intended to permit private transfers of their properties by evacuees after they migrated from India, where these transfers were completed in section 40. The rest of the definition excludes certain properties from the purview of s. 2(f), but with those excluded
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCustodian General, Evacuee Property, New Delhi and ors. Vs. Shanti Sar ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-22-1961
Reported in: AIR1961P& H497
and to pass an order determining the interest of the evacuee and the claimant in the property. Section 8, Sub-section (3), to observe that the consequence of Section 8(2) was that property vested under the previous Ordinance, 27 of 1949, was deemed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCustodian Evacuee Property Rajasthan Vs. Dr. Mohd. Saeed
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-10-1957
Reported in: AIR1958Raj93
other things declared the proper-ty of Dr, Mohd. Saeed as evacuee property un-der 13. 22(b) of the Act as it then is that he subsequently spent some money in purchasing movable property or in doing repairs of immovable property, but it has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCustodian of Evacuee Property Punjab and ors. Vs. Jafran Begum
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-20-1967
Reported in: AIR1968SC169; (1968)70PLR1; [1967]3SCR736
has to decide whether certain property is or is not evacuee property and his jurisdiction does not depend upon any collateral to entertain or adjudicate upon the any question whether any property or any right to or interest in any property is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCustodian Evacuee Property Vs. Shrimati Bibijan
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Aug-31-1956
Reported in: AIR1957All249
XXXI of 1950). Section 2(f) of the aforesaid Act defines evacuee property. It runs as follows:-- ' 'Evacuee property' means any so long as the Custodian is in charge of the property because he is prima facie the best person to manage
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCustodian of Evacuees Property, Punjab and ors. Vs. Firm Bihari Lal Pa ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-1953
Reported in: AIR1953P& H221
action taken by the Custodian-General or the Custodian under the Evacuee Property Act challenged, nor was it a matter in respect the interest of the evacuee and the claimant in the property in question and the order shall contain all or any
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Custodian, Evacuee Property, Shahjahanpur Vs. Civil Judge, S ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-25-1958
Reported in: AIR1959All574
Brothers. Jumman Khan went to Pakistan. He was declared an evacuee. His property including one-half share in Nishat Talkies was declared that, the present casedoes involve a question relating to the property ofan evacuee. The case is, therefore, covered bySub-section (1) ofl
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCustodian, Evacuee Property, Punjab and ors. Vs. Parbhu Dayal Chhajan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-24-1959
Reported in: AIR1960P& H298
jurisdiction on the Custodian to decide whether certain property is evacuee property or not and whether certain persons are evacuees or on the Custodian under the Act to decide whether the property is under a mortgage or not or that the suit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCustodian, Evacuee Property, Jullundur and ors. Vs. Firm Dharam Paul A ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-14-1960
Reported in: AIR1960P& H354
to the interpretation of S. 17(2) of the Administration of Evacuee Property Ordinance (Ordinance No. XXVII of 1949) which is in not consistent with Ss. 13 and 30, Administration of Evacuee Property Act, for the two laws cannot operate at the same
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »