Essential Commodities Special Provisions Act 1981 Section 7 - Judgment Search Results

Smt Venkatamma, and Smt Narayanamma and ors. Vs. Principal Secretary t ...

Court : Karnataka

for the housing co operative societies inter alia prescribing the essential requirements of housing scheme and also prescribing the procedure for 93s to the said agent and rs 35 lakhs to special land acquisition officer the conclusion in respect of the appellant such the state government has to accord sanction under the provisions of chapter 7 and 8 of the act without there 4 1 of the land acquisition act for short the act dated 25 9 1986 awards dated 28 1 1989 and the nature of certiorari to quash the preliminary notification under section 4 1 of the land acquisition act for short the government has to accord sanction under the provisions of chapter 7 and 8 of the act without there being a sanction

Sri P. Siddappa S/O Late Papa Reddy and Vs. State of Karnataka Represe ...

Court : Karnataka

n k patil and h s kempanna jj motor vehicles act 1988 section 166 accident claim judgment and award claim for patil and h s kempanna jj motor vehicles act 1988 section 166 accident claim judgment and award claim for enhancement assessment 0007 awarded by tribunal compensation is enhanced to rs 9 78 000 as against rs 4 14 000 paras 5 6

Mr.Soofi S/O Late Mohammad Aged About 42 Years. Vs. the State of Kamat ...

Court : Karnataka

registered for violation of sections 3 and 7 of the essential commodities act he submitted that o initiate criminal proceedings for for the offence punishable under section 7 of the essential commodities act it should be by a person not less than sub inspector of police he further submitted that under the provisions of the petrol act storing of petroleum product of class violation of sections 3 and 7 of the essential commodities act he submitted that o initiate criminal proceedings for the offence subhash b adi j this criminal petition is filed under section 482 crpc praying that this hon ble court may be 3 2010 for the offence punishable under sections 3 and 7 of the essential commodities act 2 learned counsel for the

Jayasheela Stores and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2010KAR4154

the state assumed the monopoly to trade in a given commodity has to be judged by the test whether the entire published in the name of the governor and consequently the provisions of article 166 of the constitution of india are not the demand drafts directly from the schools based on the actual strength of the students 8 as aforementioned the text books 1958 sc 731 mohd hanif vs state of bihar air 1981 sc 873 l aksnmi khandsari vs state of u p as such taken by respondents 4 and 5 that under section 7 of the karnataka education act it is open for l g and 21 and article 166 discussed paras 5 7 8 9 writ petitions are dismissed

Antrix Corporation Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2010)29VST308(Karn)

the question whether there is such transfer or not is essentially a question of fact which has to be determined with goods defined in article 366 12 has included all materials commodities and articles it is an inclusive definition and therefore not the satellite to perform certain actions the satellite and the specialised ground station used for its monitoring are owned controlled and by the appellant company should not be taxed under the provisions of the kvat act as constituting a transfer of the dealer within the meaning expression of the karnataka sales tax act 1957 and he filed a petition for quashing the notice the present case is outside the scope of provisions of section 6 of the act so long as the sale is by a person who is not registered under this act 7 time of sale of goods 1 notwithstanding anything contained in

Pushpalatha N.V. W/O Nemraj Vs. V. Padma Widow of Vasantha Kumar D.N.,

Court : Karnataka

and worship the existence of joint estate is not an essential requisite to constitute joint family and family which does not and to justify its necessity proviso is used to remove special cases from the general enactment and provide for them specially partition effected by a decree of a court these two provisions are repugnant to sub section d of section 6 a on and from the commencement of the hindu succession amendment act 2005 the daughter of a coparcener in a joint family day of december 2004 explanation for the purposes of this section partition means any partition made by execution of a deed respect of several items of properties allotted to them respectively 72 the institution of suit for partition by a member of

Smt. Parvathamma W/O Late Byrappa and ors Vs. Smt. Uma W/O Late Munira ...

Court : Karnataka

revenue appellate tribunal the tribunal affirmed the order of the special deputy commissioner that was challenged in a writ petition before the fragments themselves this court opined that there are no provisions under the act prohibiting the alienation of such fragments and hence be d class lands for the purposes of the act it cannot also be disputed that each measures less than 424 b nataraj studios p limited vs navrang studios air 1981 sc 537 c nutrfn kmnar and others vs ii additional anand byrareddy j this regular second appeal is filed under section ioo of the code of civil procedure 1900 against the zaheer and others v c v siddveerappa ilr 2010 kar 765 i e s rajan v r mohan ilr 1995 kar

Surendra Babu S/O Sri Ramaih Aged About 40 Years. Vs. State of Karnata ...

Court : Karnataka

section 3 of the karnataka open places prevention of disfigurement act 1981 2 heard both sides 3 learned counsel for the 3 of the karnataka open places prevention of disfigurement act 1981 2 heard both sides 3 learned counsel for the petitioner adi j criminal petition no 132 2010 is filed under section 482 cr p c praying to quash the proceedings in 16 2009 of sadashivanagar police station and in crime no 77 2009 of high grounds police station for the offence under

Dr.Shama Rao D, S/O Late Doraiswammy S, Vs. Dr (Mrs) Anupama

Court : Karnataka

of diat the definition of three heads of cruelty is essential for the case on hand they are 1 legal cruelty respondent herein to secure a decree of divorce under the provisions of section 13 i ia of the family court act contemplated under section 13 l ia of the hindu marriage act hence the court below has rightly allowed the petition filed and mentally which definitely amounts to cruelty as contemplated under section 13 l ia of the hindu marriage act hence the court failed to exercise jurisdiction vested in ir under section 7 of the family courts act 1984 10 that the judgment

Smt.S.K.Bhavana, Vs. M/S. United India Insurance Company Limited,

Court : Karnataka

accident the policy was in force in view of the provisions contained under section 157 of m v act contention of j this mfa filed u s 173 1 of mv act against the judgment and award dated 6 3 2008 passed was in force in view of the provisions contained under section 157 of m v act contention of the insurance company awarding a compensation of rs 1 02 000 with interest 7 5 pa from the date of petition till deposit