Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: enemy property act 1968 section 15 returns as to enemy property Page 3 of about 641 results (0.198 seconds)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2010(1)SC380; 2010(1)SCALE487; (2010)2SCC492; 2010(2)LC734(SC)

..... was issued to the custodian on 6.2.2008, and in his reply the said custodian replied that there was no provision in the enemy property act, 1968, to refund any amount received from enemy property. in response it was also indicated clearly that no amount was admissible to the applicant by way of refund.6. it is on account ..... be the sole legal heir and successor of the late raja of mahmudabad, he had succeeded to the properties belonging to the late raja which had been taken over by the custodian of enemy property under the provisions of the enemy property act, 1968. it has further been contended that it could not, therefore, be disputed that the applicant is ..... and profits collected prior to 5.4.2002, is clearly provided in section 18 of the enemy property act, 1968 which provides that the central government may by general or special order, direct that any enemy property vested in the custodian under this act and remaining with him shall be divested from him and be returned, in such manner as .....

Lucknow Nagar Nigam Vs. Kohli Brothers Colour Lab Pvt Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (c) no.17402 of 2017 page 1 of 143 adhiniyam, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as act of 1959 , for brevity sake). bird s eye view of the controversy:3. whether statutory vesting of property termed as enemy property under the provisions of the enemy property act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act for the sake of convenience) amounts to expropriation which leads to the change of its status ..... ) rules, 1962, and subrule 4 of rule 138 of defence of india rules, 1971 implying that the enemy property is only held and managed by the custodian for a specific purpose. we ought to appreciate that the statement of objects and reasons of the enemy property act, 1968 intend to continue the vesting and maintenance of civil appeal @ slp (c) no.17402 of 2017 page 28 .....

Swiss National Ins. Co., Ltd. Vs. Miller

Court : US Supreme Court

..... be settled by future direction of congress. id. 3. clause 1 of 9-b of the trading with the enemy act, as amended june 5, 1920, c. 241, 41 stat. 977, which provides for return of seized enemy property whose owner was and remains a "citizen or subject" of a nation other than germany, austria, hungary, or ..... reason of residence in germany or otherwise, were included in the term 'enemy.' we have taken over that property, and, under the present wording of the act, the custodian cannot release it, and the attorney general cannot upon application act favorably, because it was, technically, enemy property at the time. we have a number of cases of that kind, ..... former owners, where it cannot eventually yield aid or comfort to the enemy directly or indirectly. until the peace terms are finally signed and the ultimate disposition of enemy property determined by the act of congress, it shall be the firm purpose of the alien property custodian to carry out the will of the congress in respect thereto. .....

Conrad Vs. Waples

Court : US Supreme Court

..... return to their allegiance. it was the seizure and confiscation of "the estate, property, money, stocks, credits, and effects" of the persons thus specially designated that the act authorized, not the seizure and confiscation of property in enemies' territory, or of enemies generally. it was at the estate and interest which belonged to offending persons of ..... notice them in detail. what we have to say upon the confiscation act, the title which passed by a condemnation and sale under it, and the power of enemies to sell and convey to each other their interest in real property situated within the lines of the other belligerent, will sufficiently express our ..... it was dominated by the federal forces. such residents were deemed enemies by the mere fact of being inhabitants of that territory, without reference to any hostile disposition manifested or hostile acts committed by them. in numerous instances also, transfers of property were made in loyal states bordering on the line of actual .....

Planters' Bank Vs. Union Bank

Court : US Supreme Court

..... the mode of procedure for its condemnation in the courts. the system devised was necessarily exclusive. no authority was given to a military commandant, as such, to effect any confiscation. and under neither of the acts was the property of a banking institution made ..... manner provided by the acts of congress. those acts were passed on the 6th of august, 1861, and on the 17th of july, 1862. no others authorized the confiscation of private property, and they prescribed the manner in which alone confiscation could be made. they designated government agents for seizing enemies' property, and they directed ..... confiscable. both of them had in view the property of natural persons who were public enemies, of persons who gave aid and comfort to the rebellion, or who held office under .....

United States Vs. Dunnington

Court : US Supreme Court

..... be beyond question; but there are other facts which put the case in a somewhat different light. under the confiscation act of july 17, 1862, 12 stat. 589, c. 195, the lot had been seized as the property of a public enemy and sold to shepherd. by these proceedings, the estate of charles w. c. dunnington, the ancestor of the ..... dunnington, who was in rebellion against the united states. under these proceedings, the lot was duly condemned as enemy's property, and exposed to public sale at which a. r. shepherd became the purchaser and entered into possession. 3. under the act of may 8, 1872, 17 stat. 83, c. 140, 6, proceedings were commenced in the supreme court ..... the sale under the confiscation act passed the life estate subject to the charge. the subject was considered at length in the case of wallach v. van riswick, 92 u. s. 202 , which was a bill for the redemption of a deed of trust of property in washington, subsequently confiscated, given by wallach, a public enemy, to secure the payment .....

Mushtaq Ahmed and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 98(2002)DLT299

..... right to transfer the property in favor of any other person. it is thus clear that no ..... and having become its citizen was an 'enemy' within the meaning of the notification dated 10th september, 1965 issued by the government of india under the provisions of the enemy properties act and the property on the issue of the notification had thus automatically vested in the custody of 'enemy property'. on the property having thus vested in the custodian of 'enemy property' no person including the owner had any .....

Zafar Ahmed and ors. Vs. Tanwir Iqbal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1994)2CALLT156(HC)

..... the order dated 14.2.1984 passed by the assistant custodian. liberty was given to union of india to have the matter heard in accordance with section 6 of enemy property act, 1968 by a high ranking officer. the union of india filed an appeal against the said judgment being f.m.a.t. no. 22,73 of 1988. on 14 ..... filed 3rd writ petition being c.o. no. 5794(w) of 1989 .against this judgment. the writ petition was allowed and the order of the custodian of the enemy property was quashed on 18.6.1992. in this appeal, officer for the union of india alleged that the learned single judge committed an error in interfering that the order ..... was dismissed. against the said order, the respondent preferred a special appeal on the civil appellate jurisdiction side. the appeal was allowed and the assistant custodian of the enemy property was directed to dispose of the representation made by the respondent in answer to the show-cause notice. after giving them a reasonable opportunity of being heard, the custodian .....

Mumtaz Begum Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1991Cal241

..... the money decree the execution case was disposed of by noting that the same was disposed of on part satisfaction. the enemy property act was enacted in 1968 by replacing the enemy property orinance, 1968. the said enemy property act, 1968 was enacted for continuance of the vesting of enemy property under the custodian of enemy property under defence of indian rules, 1962 and for matters connected therewith. it appears that the possession of the ..... this connection has referred to the definition of enemy property as appearing in s. 2(c) of the enemy property act, 1968. 'enemy property' according to the said act means any property for the time being belonging to or held or managed on behalf of an enemy, an enemy subject or an enemy firm, mr. banerjee has contended that when in 1952 the said enemy or enemy subjects were declared as rank trespassers in respect .....

Shamim Akhtar Vs. Iqbal Ahmad and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2001(1)ALD(Cri)612; 2000(7)SCALE197; (2000)8SCC123

..... of the suit in the small causes court loses its relevance and consequently, the objections raised on the basis of the provisions of the evacuee property act, 1950 and the enemy property act, 1968 which were introduced subsequently by the respondent lose their significance for the purpose of disposal of the proceeding. our attention has not been drawn to ..... relationship of landlord and tenant between them. he raised the contention that the suit filed by the appellant was barred in view of section 8 of the enemy property act, 1968. subsequently, respondent no. 1 sought an amendment of the written statement to introduce paragraph 29-a in which a plea was raised that since the real ..... maintainability of the suit in the court in view of the provisions in the evacuee property act, 1950 and the enemy property act, 1968 as a preliminary issue. by the order dated 14.10.1982 the trial court held that under the u.p. rent act the denial of title of land lord by the tenant is itself a ground for .....