Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: employment exchanges compulsory notification of vacancies act 1959 Court: himachal pradesh Page 1 of about 2 results (0.059 seconds)

Mrs. Vidya Stokes Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1994CriLJ1833

..... scope of the employment exchanges (compulsory notification of vacancies) act, 1959 was considered in union of india v. n. ..... hargopal, : (1987)illj545sc , in which it was held that the act does not oblige any employer to employ those persons only who have been sponsored by the employment exchanges and that while the government is at perfect liberty to issue instructions to its own departments and its organisation a for filling up the vacancies by notifying the same in employment exchanges, but the instructions cannot bind other bodies which are created by the statutes and which function under the authority of the statutes. ..... in para 9, the court held:'it is clear that it is the desire of the government of india that all government departments, government organisation and statutory bodies should adhere to the rule that not merely vacancies should be notified to the employment exchanges, but the vacancies should also be filled by the candidates sponsored by the employment exchanges. ..... it is alleged that no requisition was sent to the employment exchanges and appointments were not made, as is required to be done by the rules framed by the himachal pradesh government. ..... 8/90 that petitioner misused her position in making recruitment and enrolment of 186 persons within the last 12 years without sending any requisition to the employment exchanges or without adhering to the policy of reservation. .....

Ramesh Kumar Vs. Himachal Pradesh State Forest Corporation and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... directed the respondent-corporation to make regularization/promotion to the post of timber/resign watchers without insisting that the workmen were not engaged at the time of their initial appointment as per the provisions of the employment exchange (compulsory notification of vacancies) act, 1959. ..... for promotion from amongst the cadre of daily rated resin watchers could not be rejected on the ground that their initial appointment has not been made in compliance with the provisions of the employment exchange (compulsory notification of vacancies) act, 1959. ..... the persons, who were appointed through employment exchanges, had filed this original application restraining the corporation-respondent from regularizing those persons whose names were not sponsored by the employment exchange at the time of their initial ..... contended that his client was recruited through employment exchange and was confirmed before the private respondents. ..... of the respondent-corporation before this court was that since the petitioners' name were not sponsored by the employment exchange; they could not be considered for promotion. ..... not been regularized only on the ground that their names were not sponsored by their respective employment exchanges. ..... evident from the records that initially, respondent-corporation had been regularizing only those timber/resin watchers whose names were sponsored by the employment exchanges. ..... daily rated wage timber/resin watchers in the employment of the respondent-corporation. .....

Bhagat Ram Vs. Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2005(104)FLR734]

..... the recruitment of attendants on regular basis was made in the year 1995 .it delhi alter following the procedure laid down in employment exchange (compulsory notification of vacancy) act to meet their requirement at the delhi office and the petitioner cannot claim regularization against the post of attendants/peons at the delhi office ..... were working as daily waged at delhi office, was regularized in accordance with the policy and recruitment procedure and petitioner cannot claim that simply because his name was sponsored by the employment exchange at shimla, his services ought to have been regularized against the vacancy available with the respondents at delhi office. ..... have stated that whenever vacancy/requirement arises at project site, petitioner will be considered alongwith those sponsored by the employment exchange in accordance with their ..... of the petitioner that pursuant to the requisition issued by the respondent on 19.12.1990, his name was sponsored by the employment exchange, shimla for appointment as daily wage paid attendant/peon. ..... his name was sponsored by the employment exchange in that capacity and not against ..... respondents in the month of april, 1993 for regularization of his services as his name from the role of employment exchange had already been struck off. ..... entitled to claim the benefit of regularization of the services from 1.1.1995 as the respondents had made recruitment of attendants on regular basis in the year 1995 at delhi from employment exchange, delhi.16. .....