Emphasize - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri S.K. Katyal

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2009)221CTR(Del)310; [2009]308ITR168(Delhi); [2009]177TAXMAN380(Delhi)

on the date of search were found to be intact emphasis supplied 5 on the same day 03 01 2001 the

M/S. Poulose and Mathen Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC965; 1997(90)ELT264(SC); JT1997(2)SC213; 1997(1)SCALE661; (1997)3SCC50

6 1982 there shall be no order as to costs emphasis supplied 8 in further appeal filed by the revenue the

United Electrical Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2002)178CTR(Del)192

rule is made absolute with no order as to costs emphasis here italicised in print supplied sd sugan chand mittal income

Mitradhar Barkakati and ors. Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

of a copy of this judgment and order no cost emphasis supplied 5 it would appear from the above office memorandum

Om Prakash Dwivedi Vs. the State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1996CriLJ603

to the observations made above this bail application is rejected emphasis supplied 6 it is apparent from these observations that what

Babu Ram Gupta Vs. Sudhir BhasIn and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC1528; 1979CriLJ952; (1980)3SCC47; [1979]3SCR685

this licence accordance with the above direction of this court emphasis ours 3 a perusal of the order extracted above clearly

Subordinate Services Selection Board Vs. Bir Singh and Another

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC1472; JT1997(10)SC574; 1995(2)SCALE834; 1995Supp(2)SCC651; 1995(2)LC189(SC)

this entitlement would be available to one dependent child only emphasis supplied 5 a reading of these conditions would clearly indicate

State of Bihar and Others, Etc. Etc. Vs. Bihar Distillery Ltd., Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IXAD(SC)153; AIR1997SC1511; 1997(1)BLJR551; JT1996(10)SC854; 1996(8)SCALE768; (1997)2SCC453; [1996]Supp9SCR479

the respondents in the high court are dismissed no costs emphasis supplied 12 the portions underlined by us clearly bring about

Guru Bux Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2008CriLJ2671; RLW2008(3)Raj2399

years of remission in order to be eligible for consideration emphasis supplied 4 the state of rajasthan although in its wisdom

In Re: Rt. Rev. Casmir Gnanadickam Archbishop of Madras

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1989)2MLJ418

petition by the petitioner is not maintainable and so dismissed emphasis is mine so unless there is some other statute enacting